Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:51158)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCKOXn8wTEOTZo4EFGgSW8-l5@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1T0tMD-0000IM-Si; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:03:01 -0700
Received: by qadz32 with SMTP id z32sf4805103qad.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=rgQNKdcj/zNYSbg9YwPd14OMQkClvi2rCG2Cu2ECwVg=;
        b=mInNzEubxCohwA6mHfcBU0YvUbDIIsH89oq4UYFFVBHT8qt0txkQYFM1LSRCjXIbjZ
         B4eP2/CFDrNkFEfPLwIW8gqwcSJhL6+Va5d+MJITOyjX5+zIwXCHymRHAJSaDlP3sS3V
         2WV0SdoVb1uA+ZrGWlx12XFDX2mBRNQzrxM9E=
Received: by 10.52.21.235 with SMTP id y11mr1022297vde.4.1344859364097;
        Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.93.40 with SMTP id cr8ls4442187vdb.8.gmail; Mon, 13 Aug
 2012 05:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.67.71 with SMTP id l7mr1322896vdt.12.1344859363321;
        Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <e296606d-07ce-46f3-936a-a5efaf25ae69@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <d6ea367a-0be9-4a75-be7e-754bbbeb6158@googlegroups.com>
References: <f36b517b-87d9-4aac-bfd7-b33d226bf46a@googlegroups.com> <50255C09.10805@lojban.org> <b7275ac9-1e1c-42e0-bed1-dfcb026849e8@googlegroups.com>
 <5027F722.2000607@lojban.org>
 <a6b529ff-6bf8-49a0-bd44-0011de33bc4b@googlegroups.com>
 <d6ea367a-0be9-4a75-be7e-754bbbeb6158@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] {.au}/{djica}={.ai}/{?}. No gismu for intention
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_219_1931013.1344859362793"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_219_1931013.1344859362793
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1



On Monday, August 13, 2012 2:52:19 PM UTC+4, iesk wrote:
>
> "I was gonna ..."
>
> A good part of the native English usage probably escapes me, but why can't 
> ZAhO Do the job?
>
> {mi pu pu'o} or {mi pu co'a}?
>
> Or is it a problem that, in English, you could continue "... but then I 
> didn't"?
>
I wanted to express the meaning "I intended to..." 
But Robin said that {zu'edji} is fine for expressing "intention".

(I know doi la gleki arxokuna do'u you didn't ask me.)
>
> -iesk
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/ILHqIJMOdo0J.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_219_1931013.1344859362793
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br>On Monday, August 13, 2012 2:52:19 PM UTC+4, iesk wrote:<blockquote=
 class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">"I was gonna ..."<p>A good part of the na=
tive English usage probably escapes me, but why can't ZAhO Do the job?</p><=
p>{mi pu pu'o} or {mi pu co'a}?</p><p>Or is it a problem that, in English, =
you could continue "... but then I didn't"?</p></blockquote><div>I wanted t=
o express the meaning "I intended to..."&nbsp;</div><div>But Robin said tha=
t {zu'edji} is fine for expressing "intention".</div><div><br></div><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-lef=
t: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;"><p>(I know doi la gleki arxokuna do'u=
 you didn't ask me.)</p><p>-iesk</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p></blockquot=
e>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/ILHqIJMOdo0J">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/IL=
HqIJMOdo0J</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_219_1931013.1344859362793--