Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:37843) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T1BNR-00050F-GU; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:32 -0700 Received: by wibhr14 with SMTP id hr14sf20876wib.16 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0Hrf4VsxGtBW8RKI7pq0LJdsWoJNOnk9CYcXstEPiY4=; b=RK1f471WRZEjPCQeuHqvGmEJ7fZfNGjfP7aDHHQ2y9TFFjZI8Lm2ZouNOFANa682J/ x9uDtgfnQ/Nikcwg7fwKztJsDqvQY+SP//uBT8xPLMK/s5SAKoQm7GHOpHkM2bHZXxJl ya+986NxTd33wMGuT9z1Q/+Ji75n+iuwptXGQ= Received: by 10.204.128.199 with SMTP id l7mr559384bks.0.1344928633645; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.129.214 with SMTP id p22ls72861bks.7.gmail; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr1694600bks.2.1344928632663; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.130.7 with SMTP id q7mr1694599bks.2.1344928632626; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4si413763bkj.3.2012.08.14.00.17.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.53; Received: by mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com with SMTP id c1so40829lah.26 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.42.164 with SMTP id p4mr7466350lbl.54.1344928632323; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.123.19 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:17:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1ea2d3bc-98ff-459a-9dfb-3e526c461d37@googlegroups.com> References: <201208100717.52329.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201208102342.13849.phma@phma.optus.nu> <8ccd89cb-defa-4d40-a77f-e0029180fc5f@googlegroups.com> <26a88634-94ee-4912-a307-0e200d75e81e@googlegroups.com> <9d898abb-f2c8-4c66-aaf3-fbc0af353d78@googlegroups.com> <958b4c89-a5cf-4525-adcd-d295ecc9f9e4@googlegroups.com> <1ea2d3bc-98ff-459a-9dfb-3e526c461d37@googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 01:17:12 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Direction of Rotation From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba18129660bd5104c7349992 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --90e6ba18129660bd5104c7349992 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:03:11 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Gleki Arxokuna = wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:55:04 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Jonathan Jones wro= te: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Gleki Arxokuna >>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:37:32 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Gleki Arxokuna < >>>>>>> gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So please have a look at my suggestion once again. >>>>>>>> aionys was right, it's not our old {carna}. It's something new. >>>>>>>> Robin asked "Yes, but what about objects that don't have clear >>>>>>>> . e.g. imagine a rotating rod". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In this case we must define a plane in the middle of the axis >>>>>>>> perpendicular to the axis. >>>>>>>> Then we have line-of-sight above the plane spreading to the plane. >>>>>>>> In the image attached we can see that according to what the eye >>>>>>>> (marked with "line of sight") sees >>>>>>>> the rod is rotating to the right. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So in such gismu we need a place for direction of rotation filled >>>>>>>> with "zunle/pritu". If this placed is not filled then the gismu wo= uld mean >>>>>>>> "rotating in general". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Incorrect. Under no circumstances do we need a place for direction >>>>>>> of rotation *if we define one of the two only possible directions >>>>>>> as the keyword*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For example, if we make the definition be "x1 is rotating >>>>>>> counter-clockwise viewed from orientation x2 about rotational axis/= axes >>>>>>> (set if multiple) x3", than the gismu (I'm going to use "gutni") ca= n mean >>>>>>> all of the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> gutni: counter-clockwise >>>>>>> to'e gutni / tolgutni : clockwise >>>>>>> no'e gutni : not rotating (neither clockwise nor counter-clockwise >>>>>>> rotation is occurring) >>>>>>> na'e gutni : not counter-clockwise (either clockwise or no rotation >>>>>>> is occurring.) >>>>>>> na'e tolgutni : not clockwise (either counter-clockwise or no >>>>>>> rotation is occurring.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All that is needed for the word is a default direction, which can b= e >>>>>>> changed to the other with to'e and for reasons of historical inerti= a should >>>>>>> be counter-clockwise, a place to identify the 'face' when it isn't = obvious >>>>>>> (x2 in the above), and the axis/axes about which the rotation happe= ns if it >>>>>>> isn't the typical axis. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> No. Your suggestion is not universal. Lojban usually allows ambiguou= s >>>>>> expression >>>>>> It's not possible to say "rotating" without specifying in what >>>>>> direction it rotates. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Which is why you put the default direction in the keyword. Unless of >>>>> course, you mean it IS possible. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> You need one more case: >>>>>> "rotates either clockwise or counterclockwise" >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> {ti gutni jonai to'e gutni} >>>>> "This is rotating either clockwise or counter-clockwise." >>>>> >>>> >>>> Or even: >>>> {ti carna} >>>> "This is turning." >>>> >>> Exactly. But Robin suggested making {carna} obsolete. Therefore, I'm >>> suggesting a new gismu that would cover all those meanings including {t= i >>> carna}. >>> >> >> No, Robin suggested making Lojban have one word for "turn", and one for >> "rotate". This would mean making carna mean one of the two, and making a >> new word for the other. >> >> In other words, going from: >> >> carna : x1 turns/rotates/revolves around axis x2 in direction x3. >> >> To: >> carna : x1 turns from x2 to x3 >> gutni : x1 is rotating counter-clockwise viewed from orientation x2 abou= t >> rotational axis/axes (set if multiple) x3 >> > > Not bad. Although xalbo and la gleki voted for two words. > Aren't YOU la gleki? > yesterday chat. > 21:13:40 - rlpowell: xalbo: Well, you've convinced me, so there. :D > 21:13:46 - rlpowell: gismu space is big.... > 21:13:52 - rlpowell: It's only two words. > The above quote makes no sense without more context. What was the argument that convinced Robin, what was the counter-argument, and what was the debate topic? > This is what was discussed in the chat. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, August 11, 2012 12:45:34 PM UTC+4, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> May be I missed something in this conversation but (lindar will >>>>>>>>> confirm) I didn't want to join this discussion yesterday until I = could >>>>>>>>> figure out everything myself. I even said in chat "Think 100 time= s before >>>>>>>>> suggesting any new gismu". >>>>>>>>> Still la lindar posted eir message to the list and I had to reply >>>>>>>>> to it. >>>>>>>>> So let's get back to business. >>>>>>>>> The scrutiny shows that {carna} has everything that we need. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here is my solution. >>>>>>>>> 1. Take a clock from the wall. >>>>>>>>> 2. Put it on the floor. >>>>>>>>> 3. Sit on top of the clock. Just in the middle of the clock! Be >>>>>>>>> careful not to break something in the mechanism. >>>>>>>>> 4. Look at the hands (pointers) of the clock. >>>>>>>>> 5. See? They are moving to the right of your point in space! Ever= y >>>>>>>>> atom of the hand of the clock is moving to the right. >>>>>>>>> 6. Now stand up and put the clock to the wall. >>>>>>>>> 7. Wow! The hand is no longer moving to the right. It's moving >>>>>>>>> clockwise! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So {carna fi lo pritu} means "rotate clockwise". >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now what is {se carna}? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here we have a minor problem. >>>>>>>>> When you were sitting on the clock you were the upper part of the >>>>>>>>> axis, namely the part sticking out of the front of the clock. >>>>>>>>> By the word "front" I mean that part that has digits painted on i= t >>>>>>>>> and hands moving. >>>>>>>>> What is "front"? What is "face"? >>>>>>>>> These are two-dimensional but one-side objects (like M=F6bius ban= d >>>>>>>>> or something). >>>>>>>>> You can't look at my *face* from the other side. You will simply >>>>>>>>> see the back of my head. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is what we need. >>>>>>>>> {carna lo crane lo pritu}. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> May be the definition of {carna} is really not an ideal one but I >>>>>>>>> no longer support any new gismu for "clockwise". >>>>>>>>> It's better to clarify {carna} definition, may be change it to >>>>>>>>> *x1 turns or rotates around from the viewpoint (reference frame) >>>>>>>>> of x2 in direction x3* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *This has also to do with the concept of the "line of sight".* >>>>>>>>> Humans have it and this is what "reference frame" usually refers >>>>>>>>> to. >>>>>>>>> We look forward and see the hands of the clock moving. >>>>>>>>> Even if we are blind we have such body orientation (including >>>>>>>>> mouth, nose, limbs etc) so that we are still oriented forward. >>>>>>>>> *What if we had eyes on our backs:* {pritu} has also "frame of >>>>>>>>> reference" place. Therefore, two ref-frames annihilate (sumti/sum= ti=3D1) and >>>>>>>>> we are culturally neutral again. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You might argue: what if spiders that have eyes on their limbs >>>>>>>>> learnt Lojban? Would that be culturaly neutral? >>>>>>>>> We must think about them too! >>>>>>>>> The answer is pretty clear. >>>>>>>>> If you have an eye on your leg please use reference frame and >>>>>>>>> specify which of your multiple eyes is looking at the clock. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Still we have "line of sight" left. I think that every human or >>>>>>>>> probably every animal has such feature. I can't imagine any creat= ure >>>>>>>>> without "lines-of-sensory-input". All sensory organs work that wa= y. >>>>>>>>> Therefore, I state that it's culturally neutral.* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I haven't read all the conversation. So may be somebody has >>>>>>>>> already understood this. >>>>>>>>> Thanks for your attention anyway. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, August 11, 2012 10:29:28 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jonathan Jones >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Pierre Abbat < >>>>>>>>>>> ph...@phma.optus.nu> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday 10 August 2012 16:02:46 Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Pierre Abbat < >>>>>>>>>>>> ph...@phma.optus.nu> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > > On Friday 10 August 2012 03:32:53 la .lindar. wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > What sort of thing would you put in the x3 of carna that >>>>>>>>>>>> would seem >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > valid. >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > lo terdi cu carna lo jendu lo berti .i lo junla cu carna l= o >>>>>>>>>>>> jendu lo >>>>>>>>>>>> > > bitmu .i >>>>>>>>>>>> > > lo xislu be lo karce cu carna lo jendu lo zunle be lo karc= e >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > mu'omi'e .pier. >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > Those examples don't work, because in each of them you give = a >>>>>>>>>>>> reference >>>>>>>>>>>> > point for the x3, and in none of them do you give a >>>>>>>>>>>> direction. (That said, >>>>>>>>>>>> > if carna's definition was the one I talked ab out last night= , >>>>>>>>>>>> all of them >>>>>>>>>>>> > would be perfect examples.) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The direction is from the clock, along its axis, into the wall= , >>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>> corresponds to a direction of rotation by the convention of >>>>>>>>>>>> holding the right >>>>>>>>>>>> hand so that its thumb is along the axis and the other fingers >>>>>>>>>>>> curl in the >>>>>>>>>>>> direction of rotation. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, that's not what I mean. You don't specify which direction >>>>>>>>>>> the objects are rotating. The "direction" you're talking about = is the >>>>>>>>>>> reference point. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Okay, wait, I missed the "...corresponds to a direction of >>>>>>>>>> rotation...." the first time I read it. Still, your x3's only wo= rk if you >>>>>>>>>> follow that convention, which requires you to /know/ it in the f= irst place. >>>>>>>>>> I don't know how known it is, but I'd certainly not heard of it = before you >>>>>>>>>> mentioned it, which leads me to believe "very well" is not the a= nswer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is a neat way to shove the reference point and direction of >>>>>>>>>> rotation together, even though it always means "counterclockwise= ". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do >>>>>>>>>> zo'o >>>>>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/**ms****g/lojban/-/mcZMDxumuPUJ >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@** >>>>>>>> googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>>>>>>> group****/lojban?hl=3Den >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'= o >>>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "lojban" group. >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d= / >>>>>> **ms**g/lojban/-/IB91wZqhqawJ >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@** >>>>>> googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>>>>> group**/lojban?hl=3Den . >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>>> >>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >>>> >>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "lojban" group. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/** >>> msg/lojban/-/ciQNItsaKo0J >>> . >>> >>> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@** >>> googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>> group/lojban?hl=3Den . >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> mu'o mi'e .aionys. >> >> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o >> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/1GuNz6g9ND8J. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=3Den. > --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --90e6ba18129660bd5104c7349992 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Gleki Arxokuna = <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:03:11 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
= On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <g= leki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:55:04 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at= 12:53 AM, Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com>= wrote:

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Gleki Arx= okuna <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:37:32 AM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 20= 12 at 12:10 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is...@gmail.c= om> wrote:
So please have a look at my suggestion =A0once again.
aionys was right,= it's not our old {carna}. It's something new.
Robin aske= d "Yes, but what about objects that don't have clear <face>.= e.g. imagine a rotating rod".

In this case we must define a plane in the middle of th= e axis perpendicular to the axis.
Then we have line-of-sight abov= e the plane spreading to the plane.
In the image attached we can = see that according to what the eye (marked with "line of sight") = sees
the rod is rotating to the right.

So in such = gismu we need a place for direction of rotation filled with "zunle/pri= tu". If this placed is not filled then the gismu would mean "rota= ting in general".

Incorrect. Under no circumstances do we need a place = for direction of rotation if we define one of the two only possible dire= ctions as the keyword.

For example, if we make the definition be= "x1 is rotating counter-clockwise viewed from orientation x2 about ro= tational axis/axes (set if multiple) x3", than the gismu (I'm goin= g to use "gutni") can mean all of the following:

gutni: counter-clockwise
to'e gutni / tolgutni : clockwise
no= 'e gutni : not rotating (neither clockwise nor counter-clockwise rotati= on is occurring)
na'e gutni : not counter-clockwise (either clockwis= e or no rotation is occurring.)
na'e tolgutni : not clockwise (either counter-clockwise or no rotation = is occurring.)

All that is needed for the word is a default directio= n, which can be changed to the other with to'e and for reasons of histo= rical inertia should be counter-clockwise, a place to identify the 'fac= e' when it isn't obvious (x2 in the above), and the axis/axes about= which the rotation happens if it isn't the typical axis.
=A0
No. You= r suggestion is not universal. Lojban usually allows ambiguous expression= =A0
It's not possible to say "rotating" without spe= cifying in what direction it rotates.

Which is why you put the default direction in t= he keyword. Unless of course, you mean it IS possible.
=A0
You need one more case:
"rotates either clockwise o= r counterclockwise"

{ti gutni jonai t= o'e gutni}
"This is rotating either clockwise or counter-clockw= ise."

Or even:
{ti carna}
"This is t= urning."
Exactly. But Rob= in suggested making {carna} =A0obsolete. Therefore, I'm suggesting a ne= w gismu that would cover all those meanings including {ti carna}.

No, Robin suggested making Lojban have one word for &= quot;turn", and one for "rotate". This would mean making car= na mean one of the two, and making a new word for the other.

In othe= r words, going from:

carna : x1 turns/rotates/revolves around axis x2 in direction x3.
To:
carna : x1 turns from x2 to x3
gutni : x1 is rotating counter-c= lockwise viewed from orientation x2 about rotational axis/axes (set if mult= iple) x3
=A0
N= ot bad. Although xalbo and la gleki voted for two words.
=

Aren't YOU la gleki?
=A0
This is what was d= iscussed in the chat.=A0
=A0
On Saturday, August 11, 2012 12:45:34 PM UTC+4, Gleki Arxokuna wrot= e:
May be I missed something in this conversation but (lindar will confirm) I = didn't want to join this discussion yesterday until I could figure out = everything myself. I even said in chat "Think 100 times before suggest= ing any new gismu".
Still la lindar posted eir message to the list and I had to reply to it.
So let's get back to business.
The scrutiny shows tha= t {carna} has everything that we need.

Here is= my solution.
1. Take a clock from the wall.
2. Put it on the floor.
=
3. Sit on top of the clock. Just in the middle of the clock! Be carefu= l not to break something in the mechanism.
4. Look at the hands (= pointers) of the clock.
5. See? They are moving to the right of your=A0point in space! Every a= tom of the hand of the clock is moving to the right.
6. Now stand= up and put the clock to the wall.
7. Wow! The hand is no longer = moving to the right. It's moving clockwise!

So {carna fi lo pritu} means "rotate clockwise&quo= t;.

Now what is {se carna}?

Here we have a minor problem.
When you were sitting on the clo= ck you were the upper part of the axis, namely the part sticking out of the= front of the clock.
By the word "front" I mean that part that has digits painted= on it and hands moving.
What is "front"? What is "= ;face"?
These are two-dimensional but one-side objects (like= M=F6bius band or something).
You can't look at my face from the other side. You will sim= ply see the back of my head.

This is what we need.=
{carna lo crane lo pritu}.

May be the d= efinition of {carna} is really not an ideal one but I no longer support any= new gismu for "clockwise".
It's better to clarify {carna} definition, may be =A0change it to= =A0
x1 turns or rotates around from the viewpoint (reference frame) o= f x2 in direction x3

This has also to d= o with the concept of the "line of sight".
Humans have it and this is what "reference frame" usually re= fers to.
We look forward and see the hands of the clock moving.
Even if we are blind we have such body orientation (including mout= h, nose, limbs etc) so that we are still oriented forward.
What if we had eyes on our backs:=A0{pritu} has also "fram= e of reference" place. Therefore, two ref-frames annihilate (sumti/sum= ti=3D1) and we are culturally neutral again.

You m= ight argue: what if spiders that have eyes on their limbs learnt Lojban? Wo= uld that be culturaly neutral?
We must think about them too!
The answer is pretty clear.
If you have an eye on your leg please use reference frame and speci= fy which of your multiple eyes is looking at the clock.

Still we have "line of sight" left. I think that every hu= man or probably every animal has such feature. I can't imagine any crea= ture without "lines-of-sensory-input". All sensory organs work th= at way. Therefore, I state that it's culturally neutral.

I haven't read all the conversation. So may be some= body has already understood this.
Thanks for your attention anywa= y.

On Saturday, August 11, 2012 10:29:28 AM UTC+4, aionys wro= te:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Jonathan Jones = <eye...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Pierre Abb= at <ph...@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Friday 10 August 2012 16:02:46 Jonathan Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Pierre Abbat <ph...@phma.optus.= nu> wrote:
> > On Friday 10 August 2012 03:32:53 la .lindar. wrote:
> > > What sort of thing would you put in the x3 of carna that wou= ld seem
> >
> > valid.
> >
> > lo terdi cu carna lo jendu lo berti .i lo junla cu carna lo jendu= lo
> > bitmu .i
> > lo xislu be lo karce cu carna lo jendu lo zunle be lo karce
> >
> > mu'omi'e .pier.
>
> Those examples don't work, because in each of them you give a refe= rence
> point for the x3, and in none of them do you give a direction. (That s= aid,
> if carna's definition was the one I talked ab out last night, all = of them
> would be perfect examples.)

The direction is from the clock, along its axis, into the wall, which=
corresponds to a direction of rotation by the convention of holding the rig= ht
hand so that its thumb is along the axis and the other fingers curl in the<= br> direction of rotation.

No, that's not what I mean. You don't speci= fy which direction the objects are rotating. The "direction" you&= #39;re talking about is the reference point.

Okay, wait, I missed the "...corresponds to a direction of r= otation...." the first time I read it. Still, your x3's only work = if you follow that convention, which requires you to /know/ it in the first= place. I don't know how known it is, but I'd certainly not heard o= f it before you mentioned it, which leads me to believe "very well&quo= t; is not the answer.

It is a neat way to shove the reference point and direction of rotation= together, even though it always means "counterclockwise".

--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cm= ima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/mcZMDxumuPUJ.

=20 To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@google= groups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou= p/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
= mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa = bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am yo= ur father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/IB91wZqhqawJ.

=20 To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@google= groups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou= p/lojban?hl=3Den.


=
--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo piln= o be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )




--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/ciQNItsaKo0J.

=20 To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@google= groups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou= p/lojban?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/1GuNz6g9ND8J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--90e6ba18129660bd5104c7349992--