Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:41712) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T1K1f-0002eF-CT; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:39 -0700 Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3sf535884obb.16 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Oi0kLoBem2T71uZx9v+NOqrNlWnMt/23KEYYiXAmY8E=; b=OzEAoqtJBsNfKqk8SxHvsSZcbHEEPBtKr1YHbG14bEULt6lA3UKFcocBZAYmP5j7rl 7LTgKbXMtdV3hOoIKDfb7vwLe5+PaBvyBkZzVXo12xceyWSglYG4Pjeb0YnhfQ9TITe6 0b8Vf26SD3C/fVAKVqKTKJOJ6ip1j80XvESHw= Received: by 10.224.96.19 with SMTP id f19mr3670357qan.10.1344961881016; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:21 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.195.214 with SMTP id ed22ls983437qcb.7.gmail; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.200.194 with SMTP id z42mr10073040yhn.13.1344961880528; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.200.194 with SMTP id z42mr10073039yhn.13.1344961880510; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gh0-f177.google.com (mail-gh0-f177.google.com [209.85.160.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n2si298403anp.3.2012.08.14.09.31.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.177; Received: by mail-gh0-f177.google.com with SMTP id f20so845969ghb.22 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.94.135 with SMTP id dc7mr12795372igb.37.1344961880125; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:31:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.20.11 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:30:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: MorphemeAddict Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:30:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Are Natlang the best case for entropy in communication ? To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: lytlesw@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lytlesw@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lytlesw@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f234bd919f0be04c73c5734 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8f234bd919f0be04c73c5734 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Escape Landsome wrote: > Coi rodo, > > in a noisy verbal interaction, for instance, on a phone call (but this > applies to any case, indeed), it is good for communication that the > elements of signal can be easily distinguished, so as to avoid > reception errors. > > This is achieved by natlangs, by sparsing all the existing words (for > instance, adverbs) in such a "morphologic space" that has very few > collisions. For instance, the english words for "few", "many", "a > lot" and "none" are phonologically very different of each other, so > there is little chance you could confuse them by hearing them on a > deficient phone. > > But this is not the case of lojban words, for instance so'a, so'e, > so'i, so'o etc. are very near of each other, and, assuming you don't > hear well the last vowel, you could infer something very far from what > was intended by the other speaker. > > So, is not that something that is annoying ? > > Like French "dessous" ('underneath') vs. "dessus" ('over'). The only difference is [u] vs. [y]. Apparently the French have no problem with it (or do they?), but it seems like a big problem to me. stevo > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8f234bd919f0be04c73c5734 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Escape = Landsome <escaaape@gmail.com> wrote:
Coi rodo,

in a noisy verbal interaction, for instance, on a phone call (but this
applies to any case, indeed), it is good for communication that the
elements of signal can be easily distinguished, so as to avoid
reception errors.

This is achieved by natlangs, by sparsing all the existing words (for
instance, adverbs) in such a "morphologic space" that has very fe= w
collisions. =A0 For instance, the english words for "few", "= many", "a
lot" and "none" are phonologically very different of each ot= her, so
there is little chance you could confuse them by hearing them on a
deficient phone.

But this is not the case of lojban words, for instance so'a, so'e,<= br> so'i, so'o etc. are very near of each other, and, assuming you don&= #39;t
hear well the last vowel, you could infer something very far from what
was intended by the other speaker.

So, is not that something that is annoying ?

Like French "dessous" ('underneath') vs. "de= ssus" ('over'). The only difference is [u] vs. [y]. Apparently= the French have no problem with it (or do they?), but it seems like a big = problem to me.=A0

stevo=A0
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8f234bd919f0be04c73c5734--