Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:49896) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T1MCl-00042E-64; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:51:14 -0700 Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3sf219356wey.16 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XZF4tBPSYhTNEvXr9jlYXxnljJ29QeIwKVEfNVo4laQ=; b=dAAhkqJVxXS7USG23U/AMFdophSIO5XPtUOUrXdCmqTVhynS4x7i5ouCXtn/5572MQ qV2fIiG2nkhHCuRj7+03WykvvzovpF/uF+xD2niSUw+e3emh4rBo45p4Gzpo0rYefzoe zIjWj540uwRxqY/KtXk+7hmAuAgbWN1O+2h7I= Received: by 10.180.92.103 with SMTP id cl7mr1110945wib.4.1344970255805; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.224.130 with SMTP id x2ls276976eep.7.gmail; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.209.196 with SMTP id s44mr13645765eeo.1.1344970255197; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.209.196 with SMTP id s44mr13645763eeo.1.1344970255187; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ey0-f170.google.com (mail-ey0-f170.google.com [209.85.215.170]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 46si4345327eed.1.2012.08.14.11.50.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.170; Received: by eaao11 with SMTP id o11so260585eaa.15 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.5.67 with SMTP id 43mr20680919eek.15.1344970255083; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.77] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 45sm8959670eeb.8.2012.08.14.11.50.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <502A9E0D.3050909@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:50:53 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Revising mu'ei and CAhA once again. Possible worlds. References: In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Jorge Llamb=EDas, On 05/08/2012 18:38: > On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Gleki Arxokuna > wrote: >> >> bi'ai is described as naka'ena which in my scheme is equal to {ca'a}. > > I can't see your scheme without registering to Facebook, but "ca'a" > ("actually") is not the same as ""bi'ai"=3D"naka'ena" ("necessarily"). > > If something is necessarily the case, then it must be actually the > case, but not the other way around. You may hold a philosophical > position that says that everything that is the case is necessarily so > (i.e. it could not have been any different), but linguistically it > doesn't work, because we can and do talk about how things could have > been different. If everything necessarily had to be the way it is, > nothing could have been different. "If p is the case then q is necessarily the case" doesn't entail that q is = the case; only when p is the case does it entail that q is the case. As the blessed Jim McCawley once pointed out to me on the one occasion I ha= d the good fortune to meet him: (Today is Tuesday) "If today is Thursday then tomorrow is Friday" true if interpreted as a conditional true if interpreted as so-called 'logical-if' (=3D either tomorrow is F= riday or today is not Thursday) "If today is Thursday then tomorrow is Wednesday" false if interpreted as a conditional true if interpreted as 'logical-if' "If today is Tuesday then tomorrow is Wednesday" true if interpreted as a conditional true if interpreted as 'logical-if' "If today is Thursday then tomorrow is wednesday" false if interpreted as a conditional true if interpreted as 'logical-if' It was McCawley who explained to me the logic of conditionals. --And. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.