Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:52859) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T2LZP-0005xU-M7; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:22:53 -0700 Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21sf3948040yho.16 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:22:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=pWefEO9OOVNwozFfRCfXaLrlXVTZOiwbMPb35rcQp7g=; b=1j+mSZceiPGPZKdmwgk5DqfKtyNGBcydVM4zhKBMnC7arjYpNFh3ybSuk6X9qiK3IA GO8qcBqcw+kUK9X0KytROTwPIsArOoeYDBr8cwc2S+NIMC+FkmMxbFdD3RIOuq0XJHIr OTVSy3afiD+aJLkzKiAPxnpblcLxLG4PPhATw= Received: by 10.236.185.130 with SMTP id u2mr1399822yhm.0.1345206144286; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:22:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.170.229 with SMTP id p65ls8376713yhl.5.gmail; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.180.41 with SMTP id i29mr1396144yhm.4.1345206143653; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:22:21 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <9444b1d5-1981-4001-84a0-bd9cbe459f2b@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <23861931-0238-4ac4-a76e-60a8ea1b4d75@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] {ko}, {xa'e}, {.e'u}, {e'o} MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1509_30811142.1345206141711" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_1509_30811142.1345206141711 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Friday, August 17, 2012 3:47:13 PM UTC+4, kamisori wrote: > > but {xa'e} is a rafsi of {xance}, how would you use it to say such things > as "let's go"? > Lojban has many cmavo that are identical to rafsi. They never conflict. {xa'e mi'o klama} - "let's go!" {xa'emi'o} can't be a lujvo. Back to the main point, I *don't* like {xa'e}. Another UI-cmavo would do but I'm comfortable even without it now. > > 2012/8/17 la gleki > > >> {xa'e} was invented to say such things as "Let's go!" but I prefer using >> {.e'u mi'o klama}. >> So may be if someone has Not-Enough-Gismu syndrome it's better to create >> a cmavo in UI selmaho? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/CI7usJJMmGsJ. >> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+un...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/pzkybeHObh4J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_1509_30811142.1345206141711 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday, August 17, 2012 3:47:13 PM UTC+4, kamisori wrote:but {xa'e} is a rafsi of {xance}, how= would you use it to say such things as "let's go"?
Lo= jban has many cmavo that are identical to rafsi. They never conflict.
=
{xa'e mi'o klama} - "let's go!"
{xa'emi'o} can't be a lujvo.=

Back to the main point, I *don't* like {xa'e}. An= other UI-cmavo would do but I'm comfortable even without it now.

2012= /8/17 la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com>
{xa'e} was invented to say such things as "L= et's go!" but I prefer using {.e'u mi'o klama}.
So may be if someone has Not-Enough-Gismu syndrome it's better to create a = cmavo in UI selmaho?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/CI7usJJMmGsJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googl= egroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/= lojban?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/pz= kybeHObh4J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_1509_30811142.1345206141711--