Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f61.google.com ([209.85.215.61]:59404) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T2VAs-0003xn-0P; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:38:01 -0700 Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12sf1389715lag.16 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:37:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=duS6U43MtP7Jlkk/Du4Uuws3kZaZomKR62OrqCJefng=; b=OMB2KQXJqNTsgYeb3LrpZoKmzaDT1GDqKufGyWBfUQ7EZDIoL6JL55i5p+5DYw+3Ws pA5sm/3QfKx5BWVLLFQL4BWHI6wU/TG5ANKlXHKY6uOoAE5KPJhkaS0nKML7jruPB3C9 xtO9auMhLAxYcWbHAgVk36FiCvVqTsDxP3jWg= Received: by 10.180.109.136 with SMTP id hs8mr441417wib.4.1345243061582; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:37:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.181.12.12 with SMTP id em12ls2684117wid.2.gmail; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.95.2 with SMTP id dg2mr664660wib.2.1345243060837; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.95.2 with SMTP id dg2mr664659wib.2.1345243060824; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.23]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id e5si1441693wiw.0.2012.08.17.15.37.40; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2012 22:37:40 -0000 Received: from p57A08E95.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.142.149] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 18 Aug 2012 00:37:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+jWcxfI4qjNTmd60WwWcvCu9Dd0HdB0X4Z5eMS7X eKCITazKHZ1FeP Message-ID: <502EC7B1.4080908@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:37:37 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] modals inside description sumti (za'e "internal-modals") question References: <773eccc7-0054-44a8-b571-928115835460@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <773eccc7-0054-44a8-b571-928115835460@googlegroups.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Am 17.08.2012 23:21, schrieb sunderland: > Forgive me if this question is super obvious or misguided: Any question is worth being asked. > FAhA as a tense goes into {lo} as part of the selbri (I think): {lo > zu'a zarci}, "store to the left". But what about FAhA as a modal, > i.e., "store to the left of the school"? Any TAG (TAG is the pseudo-selma'o for all sumtcita, like tenses and BAI and FAhA) can be between the lo and the sumti. You can use FAhA as modal tags too: lo zarci be zu'a lo ckule "the store to the left of the school" > - You could use a relative clause with the full gismu (but not all > FAhA get a gismu). > {lo zarci poi zunle lo ckule} All FAhA (and all other sumtcita) can be expressed using fi'o + some selbri. {lo zarci poi zunle lo ckule} is fine. > - You could do a couple of awful conversions (can {jai} can even take > FAhA instead of BAI?). > {lo sejaizu'ase zarci be lo ckule} jai works on any TAG. But I agree that that's an awful construct. I don't think that's a good idea. > ==> Is there a straightforward way to put a modal phrase into a > description sumti? (How do you do za'e "internal-modals"?) There is: lo pe TAG SUMTI SELBRI lo pe bai ko'a broda (<-- in a more lojbanic form) > > Somewhat relatedly, I was also wondering, are the following grammatical? > 1. {zu'a lo ckule [ku] cu zarci} Yes, that's grammatical. > 2. {lo mu'i tavla} That too, but only as long as the modal is empty. Otherwise use the construct I showed above. > In other words, can {cu} separate the selbri from a modal phrase > (something other than leading sumti)? 1. is technically an observative > (I think) after all. Secondly, is BAI considered part of the selbri > when it's used like a tense? As long as there is a term before the cu, it's fine. A term is any of the following: {SUMTI, TAG SUMTI, TAG ku, NA ku}. So yes, you can do that. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.