Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:36300) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T2WzS-0004ei-FB; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:34:22 -0700 Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf4526666ghb.16 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition; bh=rUESbWwUORaB6NysauxzEeeG99L/c6ZwFIEw6ocXCiE=; b=hvCntdo1EOPVyZd4VXLVodx3dcd0nYpwxFyHveyF1Mk9kO6Q2qE4X7vdDRbotYm9Py 10k0dO/ooXJ+AVQxc9p2TdfK1J1H/5vcCsvooMfWiE+cQ58Mo9cSm7iqGI5IovUCQgNO Df5fYT4dH/00PVf/dVTEiHizSRQLdLLqVXdiA= Received: by 10.236.173.202 with SMTP id v50mr2383870yhl.19.1345250043821; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:34:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.78.164 with SMTP id g24ls10437598yhe.6.gmail; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.190.104 with SMTP id d68mr4085254yhn.45.1345250043074; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.190.104 with SMTP id d68mr4085253yhn.45.1345250043061; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id u67si2467761yhi.7.2012.08.17.17.34.02; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5; Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5E82ABE4 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:34:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] modals inside description sumti (za'e "internal-modals") question Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:33:59 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <773eccc7-0054-44a8-b571-928115835460@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <773eccc7-0054-44a8-b571-928115835460@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201208172034.00455.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Friday 17 August 2012 17:21:21 sunderland wrote: > Forgive me if this question is super obvious or misguided: > > FAhA as a tense goes into {lo} as part of the selbri (I think): {lo zu'a > zarci}, "store to the left". But what about FAhA as a modal, i.e., "store > to the left of the school"? Selpa'i's answer, "lo zarci be zu'a lo ckule", is good; it's what I'd say. This term "modal" is at odds with its meaning in linguistics, which is words like "ka'e" and "nu'o". There are two kinds of prepositions in Lojban: those that are derived from brivla, are inherently prepositions, and can be converted with SE; and tense markers used as prepositions. The former are what the Book calls "modals". "zu'a" is a spatial tense marker. The dictionary may define it using "fi'o", but it's not an exact equivalent. > In other words, can {cu} separate the selbri from a modal phrase (something > other than leading sumti)? 1. is technically an observative (I think) after > all. Secondly, is BAI considered part of the selbri when it's used like a > tense? You can't use BAI as a tense. It's a proper preposition; if you put it just before the selbri, it adds a place to the predicate and leaves it unfilled. A string of tense markers just before a selbri is grammatical: pu be'a sanli But a string of prepositions including BAI is not: *ca gau farvi *gau ca farvi ca farvi gau gau ku ca farvi *bai ta'i zbasu bai zbasu ta'i mu'omi'e .pier. -- I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.