Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:56079) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T2kpk-0003vq-SB; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:21:14 -0700 Received: by yhoo21 with SMTP id o21sf5063412yho.16 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:20:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=+khH0FAkW9/EpPLNllAAOOxQP9PrbcrXriGXaeiOmCk=; b=efbVwjE+O1yz4Ob8UQEUozjM9HDqj9/io5P8i6FPHyMByjQqJfNlZm/SbNKDwz1MN4 VidHqf3MKlFXxwL0VOyNRqqtpGvwuebJDSiK4+W4ANsbiPP/OBrTZ1EwpFWA02GUu70a fOrOCYNUeUj2F6IEu/rZvJLvuXrjDmSK1ghnc= Received: by 10.68.132.233 with SMTP id ox9mr1271636pbb.10.1345303257880; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:20:57 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.230.196 with SMTP id ta4ls4670459pbc.1.gmail; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.223.66 with SMTP id qs2mr1338627pbc.18.1345303257299; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 08:20:56 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <16cab846-3f84-4bc6-b64f-56aeab08244b@googlegroups.com> Subject: [lojban] Let's move {soi} to JOI. And why can't places be interconnected in lojban predicates? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_59_28777322.1345303256398" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_59_28777322.1345303256398 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 At first some examples. 1.{mi ce do simxu lo nu viska} - presumably it's "We see each other" although we don't know what places of {viska} must be filled with {mi,do}. 2."The clown and the grocer despise one another." So in the chat it has been suggested that we could move {soi} to JOI with the following result: 3.{mi soi do ze'e prami}, quite a laconic way to say "We loved each other since the beginning of time". Even more examples: 4."France and Britain had been at war [with each other] for 100 years". So don't you think that those multiple meaningful examples that are supposed to be frequently realised in our speech are enough to settle the issue with {soi}? More reading:*http://www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/lojbanbrochure/lessons/lessappendix.html * *One more global note*. Predicate arguments seems never to be interacting with each other in gismu. This proposal is one of such attempts to overcome the issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/jNNAUGybrD4J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_59_28777322.1345303256398 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
At first some examples.

1.{mi ce do simxu= lo nu viska} - presumably it's "We see each other" although we don't know = what places of {viska} must be filled with {mi,do}.

2."The clown and the grocer despise one another."

So in the chat it has been suggested that we could move {soi} to JOI with= the following result:

3.{mi soi do ze'e prami}, q= uite a laconic way to say "We loved each other since the beginning of time"= .

Even more examples:

4."= France and Britain had been at war [with each other] for 100 years".
<= div>
So don't you think that those multiple meaningful exampl= es that are supposed to be frequently realised in our speech are enough to = settle the issue with {soi}?

More reading: http= ://www.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/lojbanbrochure/lessons/lessappendix.html

One more global note.
Predicate ar= guments seems never to be interacting with each other in gismu. This propos= al is one of such attempts to overcome the issue.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/jN= NAUGybrD4J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_59_28777322.1345303256398--