Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:43833) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T2t1D-0003Fb-Nv; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:36 -0700 Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3sf5219827obb.16 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=aNKTkrURpY731GaVlVzTggj523dhtB5ywwVwv21D1x8=; b=KlVjfuq7Sw/e8tRIMJhO4A6HLYqyWHkGGB+06b0GK7TS2i9QU8iviWUgQqpj8oL80f RmNuAadu9i6TIeR3tx+mrxzHx7mUJy4E42+uIt7I+w8KPeYIVK9RJYVWnuyhhMGcd+b9 mcIfS5ECVJT2HJ6gXzn+7FLlgiQEIN5JMC74w= Received: by 10.68.223.66 with SMTP id qs2mr1396126pbc.18.1345334720743; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:20 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.116.38 with SMTP id jt6ls5350285pbb.8.gmail; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.74.41 with SMTP id q9mr1426159pav.41.1345334719969; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.74.41 with SMTP id q9mr1426158pav.41.1345334719955; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com (mail-pz0-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nv4si1721898pbc.2.2012.08.18.17.05.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.52; Received: by dakf10 with SMTP id f10so1338094dak.25 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.201.234 with SMTP id kd10mr23133115pbc.141.1345334719578; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.213.67 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:05:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <000e0cd5187e58762a04c77bb7d6@google.com> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:05:19 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: [lojban] Re: Zombie From: "Mike S." To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: maikxlx@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=maikxlx@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c40810810d04c7932614 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8ff1c40810810d04c7932614 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike S. wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mike S. wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On , ".arpis." wrote: >>>>>> > Not all uses of "zombie" (in English) involve a controller; e.g. >>>>>> Left 4 Dead, Night of the Living Dead, Shawn of the Dead, etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, I've seen all those "BRAAAAIIINS" and green skin around but I >>>>>> would favour the original Voodoo myth :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > Also, I'd just like to note that I have difficulty pronouncing the >>>>>> terminal {ii} to be distinct from {i}. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a similar problem in Italian with "principii" (principles) >>>>>> and "principi" (princes). With some exercise they come out very distinct. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It shouldn't be difficult at in Lojban. {ii} is a diphthong pronounced >>>>> "YEE", {i} is a vowel pronounced "EE". >>>>> >>>> >>>> What would be your take on fu'ivla containing {dii}? >>> >>> >>> The same as my take on all fu'ivla: I don't like it. >>> >>> You'll have to be more specific if you want a better answer. >>> >> >> Do you notice any difficulties with {dii}? >> > > No. Should I? Allowing {ii} after coronal sounds like {d} causes many fine minimal contrasts - {di dzi dji zi ji} seems plenty; those with {dii dzii djii zii jii} seems excessive. For some people, plain semivowel {i} will be mixed up with some sort of fricative or affricate even before OPEN vowels. When you place it near {i}, you are almost insisting that they (af)fricatize it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8ff1c40810810d04c7932614 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jonatha= n Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, = Aug 18, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Jonathan J= ones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mike = S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan J= ones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, <rdenta= to@gmail.com> wrote:
On , ".arpis." <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
>= ; Not all uses of "zombie" (in English) involve a controller; e.g= . Left 4 Dead, Night of the Living Dead, Shawn of the Dead, etc.

Yes, I've seen all those "BRAAAAIIINS" and green sk= in around but I would favour the original Voodoo myth :)


> = Also, I'd just like to note that I have difficulty pronouncing the term= inal {ii} to be distinct from {i}.

We have a similar problem in Italian with "principii" (= principles) and "principi" (princes). With some exercise they com= e out very distinct.

It shouldn't be difficult at in Lojban. {ii= } is a diphthong pronounced "YEE", {i} is a vowel pronounced &quo= t;EE".

What would be your take on = fu'ivla containing {dii}?

The same as= my take on all fu'ivla: I don't like it.

You'll have to= be more specific if you want a better answer.

Do you notice any difficulties with {dii}?

No. Should I?
<= br>Allowing {ii} after coronal sounds like {d} causes many fine minimal con= trasts - {di dzi dji zi ji} seems plenty; those with {dii dzii djii zii jii= } seems excessive.=A0

For some people, plain semivowel {i} will be mixed up with some sort of= fricative or affricate even before OPEN vowels. =A0 When you place it near= {i}, you are almost insisting that they (af)fricatize it.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8ff1c40810810d04c7932614--