Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:60575) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T2tnv-0004Bl-Od; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:56 -0700 Received: by vcbfl10 with SMTP id fl10sf5031423vcb.16 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=QDiifbjWKB239nKh4Pk8+18gdLWpbOpmGkcMMix5Pzs=; b=Si9lkkHsy+a2BWmW45vkcBd4UN1bn7RFCvw2n9gvUo+4Wl8BQOQIBANbGEpcP6xb8j y3FYQR7+4jIU+fah4VVvT2pK+p3LE+m0yifZH/eYMJ3FEqJezC2rh/b6W1hxiYVC+pub owTDsQZY6JnIv+kxSgpN/te8eSfBtyi0r+xec= Received: by 10.68.201.229 with SMTP id kd5mr1395043pbc.11.1345337740478; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:40 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.197.72 with SMTP id is8ls5328980pbc.5.gmail; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.213.68 with SMTP id nq4mr1532981pbc.6.1345337739649; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.213.68 with SMTP id nq4mr1532980pbc.6.1345337739633; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com (mail-pb0-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vo7si1743001pbc.1.2012.08.18.17.55.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.42; Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id rp8so4378720pbb.15 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.193.196 with SMTP id hq4mr23581965pbc.32.1345337739431; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.213.67 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:55:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <000e0cd5187e58762a04c77bb7d6@google.com> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:55:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: [lojban] Re: Zombie From: "Mike S." To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: maikxlx@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=maikxlx@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15ae270fd06004c793da9c X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b15ae270fd06004c793da9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Mike S. wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike S. wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mike S. wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On , ".arpis." wrote: >>>>>>>> > Not all uses of "zombie" (in English) involve a controller; e.g. >>>>>>>> Left 4 Dead, Night of the Living Dead, Shawn of the Dead, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, I've seen all those "BRAAAAIIINS" and green skin around but I >>>>>>>> would favour the original Voodoo myth :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > Also, I'd just like to note that I have difficulty pronouncing >>>>>>>> the terminal {ii} to be distinct from {i}. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a similar problem in Italian with "principii" (principles) >>>>>>>> and "principi" (princes). With some exercise they come out very distinct. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It shouldn't be difficult at in Lojban. {ii} is a diphthong >>>>>>> pronounced "YEE", {i} is a vowel pronounced "EE". >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What would be your take on fu'ivla containing {dii}? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The same as my take on all fu'ivla: I don't like it. >>>>> >>>>> You'll have to be more specific if you want a better answer. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Do you notice any difficulties with {dii}? >>>> >>> >>> No. Should I? >> >> >> Allowing {ii} after coronal sounds like {d} causes many fine minimal >> contrasts - {di dzi dji zi ji} seems plenty; those with {dii dzii djii zii >> jii} seems excessive. >> >> For some people, plain semivowel {i} will be mixed up with some sort of >> fricative or affricate even before OPEN vowels. When you place it near >> {i}, you are almost insisting that they (af)fricatize it. >> > > I have no idea what you just said. What I am trying to say is that, if all those combinations become common, people from around the world are going to mispronounce them and confuse them with one another. I am implying that disallowing {ii} helps Lojban reach its goal that the sounds and the letters correspond with each other "one-to-one". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --047d7b15ae270fd06004c793da9c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Jonatha= n Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, = Aug 18, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Jonat= han Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike = S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Jonathan J= ones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mike = S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Jonathan J= ones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:07 PM, <rdenta= to@gmail.com> wrote:
On , ".arpis." <rpglover64+jbobau@gmail.com> wrote:
>= ; Not all uses of "zombie" (in English) involve a controller; e.g= . Left 4 Dead, Night of the Living Dead, Shawn of the Dead, etc.

Yes, I've seen all those "BRAAAAIIINS" and green sk= in around but I would favour the original Voodoo myth :)


> = Also, I'd just like to note that I have difficulty pronouncing the term= inal {ii} to be distinct from {i}.

We have a similar problem in Italian with "principii" (= principles) and "principi" (princes). With some exercise they com= e out very distinct.

It shouldn't be difficult at in Lojban. {ii= } is a diphthong pronounced "YEE", {i} is a vowel pronounced &quo= t;EE".

What would be your take on = fu'ivla containing {dii}?

The same as= my take on all fu'ivla: I don't like it.

You'll have to= be more specific if you want a better answer.

Do you notice any difficulties with {dii}?

No. Should I?
<= br>
Allowing {ii} after coronal sounds like {d} causes many fine= minimal contrasts - {di dzi dji zi ji} seems plenty; those with {dii dzii = djii zii jii} seems excessive.=A0

For some people, plain semivowel {i} will be mixed up with some sort of= fricative or affricate even before OPEN vowels. =A0 When you place it near= {i}, you are almost insisting that they (af)fricatize it.

I have no idea what you just said.
<= br>What I am trying to say is that, if all those combinations become common= , people from around the world are going to mispronounce them and confuse t= hem with one another.=A0 I am implying that disallowing {ii} helps Lojban r= each its goal that the sounds=20 and the letters correspond with each other "one-to-one".

<= br>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--047d7b15ae270fd06004c793da9c--