Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:60059)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNXflom_FxCDnsGBBRoE5dEKHw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1T2vEZ-0005jW-0Z; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:31 -0700
Received: by yenq11 with SMTP id q11sf5351151yen.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=tCRi8Yhgw0al187AGm5T/WWPb8UDj6lvoEIAaE0MVQA=;
        b=WfSSo+m85dnlNyL1axGuGU/NCutbQMCSQAki6cTgGu2hbFvIh7P2ncVYS1EPY/DdWW
         uZieSRK5QXq1KPKxmi6GprwiJXHphQjMQ8i1XzAf3j6KucYSUdQIUoeU5L9aR6f9Xy1D
         8OXpNgingbQQFT7ylSuw9H6GfwRK8QNBfTye4=
Received: by 10.68.125.193 with SMTP id ms1mr1396289pbb.2.1345343235966;
        Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.116.38 with SMTP id jt6ls5491601pbb.8.gmail; Sat, 18 Aug
 2012 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.83.74 with SMTP id o10mr1343908pay.33.1345343235186;
        Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.83.74 with SMTP id o10mr1343907pay.33.1345343235174;
        Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com (mail-pb0-f41.google.com [209.85.160.41])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p7si1784743pby.0.2012.08.18.19.27.15
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.41;
Received: by pbbro12 with SMTP id ro12so5995412pbb.14
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.242.231 with SMTP id wt7mr18435666pbc.99.1345343234943;
 Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.213.67 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj332sXN+T6zx1tZi0VmpYxVpDGWEBnW2zthnrjTcEvWqg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALm==BVL4ReGUDDfKkS8UCpSyQ2MM55JwBAs3Ae6LCp9FEFb_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<000e0cd5187e58762a04c77bb7d6@google.com>
	<CAMKwHj36YbO7PVFDpwro-P1AwtFGd8cFLDuHjmwzSrXtMO+f+Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOYwWb0ejGK-dnQUo7N+rptX+BsE4d8_YLGxGDySNJUBfdUztg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj3+ehtAMTaifroffnT2QKbNLY8toKtY-bkgAcOFu9FF5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOYwWb0ChV9mn=CTy49ErM52mTKke7yBY+dWeLdpef=BxDSrDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj1JfmUVOrqqHverFvFRxyy+HPDSx0_q_Nf-QCMn378fvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOYwWb0m68-ocOA4N2Y++Q=GhW-QiTfcL3-0wrHVov2crza3-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj3f6V_HzL5+4ZVHFOUsk81f4dMr-8CLvifhyinDgVTBqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOYwWb2Dv6a3pbP2K+ap-5k0Oamb=s2UW_NA04BADrg5ytw00g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj332sXN+T6zx1tZi0VmpYxVpDGWEBnW2zthnrjTcEvWqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:27:14 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOYwWb1zjBBCCf5KoN_RObFxVbtZEZa_c0UnV6trcGqRs4T0RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [lojban] Re: Zombie
From: "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: maikxlx@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=maikxlx@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b339c839eac7504c7952188
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

--047d7b339c839eac7504c7952188
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I'm not talking about what should and should not be allowed. All I'm
> saying is that in Lojban, {ii}, is pronounced "yee", and {i} is pronounced
> "ee".


But no one disputes those pronunciations.  What's being discussed is
whether it is a *good idea* to use it in fu'ivla like suggested {dzombii}.
It was already pointed out that {ii} is difficult for many globally.   In
fact, {ii} is very marginal even in Lojban.  TTBOMK it was totally kept out
of native vocabulary except for the interjection {.ii}, which I think was
wise.  It'd probably be best to generally keep it and {uu} out of fu'ivla
too.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--047d7b339c839eac7504c7952188
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Jonathan Jo=
nes <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:eyeonus@gmail.com" target=3D"_b=
lank">eyeonus@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:=
1ex">
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"></div><b=
r></div></div>I&#39;m not talking about what should and should not be allow=
ed. All I&#39;m saying is that in Lojban, {ii}, is pronounced &quot;yee&quo=
t;, and {i} is pronounced &quot;ee&quot;.</blockquote>
</div><br>But no one disputes those pronunciations.=A0 What&#39;s being dis=
cussed is whether it is a *good idea* to use it in fu&#39;ivla like suggest=
ed {dzombii}.=A0 It was already
pointed out that {ii} is difficult for many globally.=A0=A0 In fact, {ii} i=
s
 very marginal even in Lojban.=A0 TTBOMK it was totally kept out of native=
=20
vocabulary except for the interjection {.ii}, which I think was wise.=A0 It=
&#39;d probably be=20
best to generally keep it and {uu} out of fu&#39;ivla too.<br><br><br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



--047d7b339c839eac7504c7952188--