Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:40639)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCF_MiBBRoEUeJ4cw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1T3SCS-00050p-Uo; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:39:36 -0700
Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3sf1905970wey.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=Uwt478Y0u7BN3ARFySuC0NQaDHRROKg+5/JYiID4SYw=;
        b=kfozgEbMzqoYcpqiE+oZt3X/dk3S0sI68Tyi6o7DyKjgzz8eVbX6twVaSsRkLRTmli
         nduyTU1Y/s2XNmbJj6XlAK9WJeeP3onv4Gv39VDkPQL4UJ0cLFIH2kgmx3TRA0M1WPhZ
         XHSQZ0j4YFtBnBVnqs434j3Gu0BVbE59SKsi0=
Received: by 10.180.109.136 with SMTP id hs8mr792423wib.4.1345469957370;
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.209.195 with SMTP id s43ls1573240eeo.5.gmail; Mon, 20 Aug
 2012 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr3478896eel.3.1345469955809;
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.173.68 with SMTP id u44mr3478893eel.3.1345469955786;
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com (mail-ee0-f50.google.com [74.125.83.50])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si21935109eep.0.2012.08.20.06.39.15
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.50 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.50;
Received: by eekc50 with SMTP id c50so1545484eek.9
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.204.72 with SMTP id g48mr8847163eeo.45.1345469955657; Mon,
 20 Aug 2012 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.95.78 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDVgzuTa4hxjTAAkRc9HB2LXqN5G6cqJv+chFDKJ4G2dmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOQ8VDVgzuTa4hxjTAAkRc9HB2LXqN5G6cqJv+chFDKJ4G2dmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:39:15 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2fKF0o45+mDgYeo5bACYgwFR=jSvtFxaRcyo=kjEgEYQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] A use for {pe naku} ?
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.50 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Consider the following:
> {.i mi se gunta re lo gerku .i pa lo gerku cu bunre .ije lo drata naku go'i
> .i lo gerku pe naku cu simlu lo ka xendo zmadu lo gerku pe ja'aku}
> We can use {pe naku} and also {pe ja'aku} to create a disambiguation between
> things based on whether or not they have a contextually relevant property,
> in this case {ka bunre}.
>
> What do you think of this?

That's my interpretation too. See:

http://www.lojban.org/tiki//tiki-view_forum_thread.php?topics_offset=235&topics_sort_mode=hits_desc&forumId=1&comments_parentId=6129&display=print

"pe naku " is equivalent to "poi na co'e".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.