Received: from mail-lb0-f189.google.com ([209.85.217.189]:40351)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCGvsmBBRoE8X7RZA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1T3UOm-0006Yq-4W; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:00:20 -0700
Received: by lban1 with SMTP id n1sf1968291lba.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=FY4rJi87ar7jq97438A7y6lRl60qNCJSfP8voL1auws=;
        b=txzU+li0gARyuu/HzSviUTX0xogYT1smNLgeOmc6GmDQY504tqu9TePV1eMwhL4ZtW
         +LGk6P0ut3H7OpbfzAQ0Ztqc0eUrogBtd+ddt/KZ0J1TcKsEIuldOcTSAsoSjXd4RZ70
         dfPdgxZ8h5a54zAOuIQFX0SdP0qpaYXJGOveI=
Received: by 10.216.210.153 with SMTP id u25mr254254weo.12.1345478406115;
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.177.133 with SMTP id d5ls1632046eem.4.gmail; Mon, 20 Aug
 2012 09:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.176.196 with SMTP id b44mr2388742eem.4.1345478405141;
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.176.196 with SMTP id b44mr2388739eem.4.1345478405121;
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f171.google.com (mail-ey0-f171.google.com [209.85.215.171])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3si8917940eep.1.2012.08.20.09.00.05
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.171;
Received: by eaah11 with SMTP id h11so1780636eaa.2
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.204.72 with SMTP id g48mr9389898eeo.45.1345478404917; Mon,
 20 Aug 2012 09:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.95.78 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201208201147.51663.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <CAOQ8VDVgzuTa4hxjTAAkRc9HB2LXqN5G6cqJv+chFDKJ4G2dmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2fKF0o45+mDgYeo5bACYgwFR=jSvtFxaRcyo=kjEgEYQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<201208201147.51663.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:00:04 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2d2O0jHiS3+iLC0rntaBZHryetXbLghyCwjTrS6xafhCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] A use for {pe naku} ?
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.171 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> On Monday 20 August 2012 09:39:15 Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote:
>>
>> "pe naku " is equivalent to "poi na co'e".
>
> What about "po'u naku" and "goi naku"?

"po'u" is "poi du" (although it's hardly any shorter, so it's not
clear why it was ever assigned its own cmavo) so that would make "po'u
naku" "poi [ke'a] du [zo'e] naku". I guess with enough context it
could make sense.

"goi" is "noi ca'e du", so that would make "goi naku" "noi ca'e [ke'a]
du [zo'e] na ku". Meaningful, assuming you can figure out the referent
of "zo'e", but I can't at the moment see anything useful in it.
Probably equivalent to "goi na'e bo zo'e"

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.