Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:56886) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T3qob-0007Yh-QN; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:56:35 -0700 Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3sf7452317obb.16 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:56:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=t7UnG5HB3l5WGFrWy4Xlid8D+PJhijlpViiuhv0PG2o=; b=jPR/eJMqHnC08qBFb/AtP4tl30AkCfperunBquW6wC9iwSg5euARxsl9Nxm/1oFptE kGDoQ8f+gHlG19YlyMt0esCSHHd5yeVsbz3+sNZYO3apUNUzhP6gFspF6/+AKeqdrwOG WFff5yhZqS5JgKvyaMBS6OrmD+h67fZ8s1FhA= Received: by 10.68.239.100 with SMTP id vr4mr2729639pbc.7.1345564579005; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:56:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.195.39 with SMTP id ib7ls2053850pbc.9.gmail; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.225.234 with SMTP id rn10mr873729pbc.3.1345564577471; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <201208211133.47594.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <86e78277-c410-4da2-bf88-2c3b28752932@googlegroups.com> <201208211133.47594.phma@phma.optus.nu> Subject: Re: [lojban] Two new gismu, "stomach" and "back of body". And a proposal for an updated method of generating gismu. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_595_29287646.1345564576832" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_595_29287646.1345564576832 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:33:46 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Tuesday 21 August 2012 11:07:36 la gleki wrote:=20 > > For "stomach" we get=20 > > cmn vei 0.253388 eng beli 0.22019 spa bientre 0.097425 ara muada= =20 > > 0.092683 hin pet 0.087398 ben pet 0.058401 rus jeludyk 0.053388 por= =20 > > bariga 0.050271 jap xara 0.033198 pun pet 0.028692 deu magen 0.02818= 4=20 > > fra vontr 0.025474=20 > > With first 4 languages it outputs=20 > > *vreli velti venli velbi* 0.691286 (rating) With all 12 languages it= =20 > > outputs *vetli* 0.535=20 > > (rating)=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > I'd choose {vetli} as it's similar to Chinese vei, English belly, India= n=20 > > "pet" and Romance "ventr-"=20 > > I would use neither "belly" nor "vientre", as they mean "betfu" which we= =20 > already have. The Spanish for "stomach" is "est=F3mago". "slamycanti" was= =20 > proposed some years ago.=20 > Robin asked me to add them to jvs but I see now he was too hasty. > > > For "back of human body" we get=20 > > cmn beiji 0.253388 eng bak 0.22019 spa espalda 0.097425 ara vyxra= =20 > > 0.092683 hin pic 0.087398 ben pic 0.058401 rus spin 0.053388 por=20 > kostas=20 > > 0.050271 jap se 0.033198 pun pic 0.028692 deu riuk 0.028184 fra dos= =20 > > 0.025474=20 > > Top score is bekpi bajdi 0.50684 4 langs bekpi 0.4697 12 langs=20 > > I'd choose {bekpi} which reminds me of Chinese bei, English back, India= n=20 > > pic and Russian sPIna.=20 > > I agree that we need a word to distinguish back, the dorsal side of an=20 > animal,=20 > from back, the area behind something. They are the same side for a human,= =20 > but=20 > not for most vertebrates. This word sounds good. Also, I think we need a= =20 > word=20 > for the ventral side of an animal.=20 > > Pedantically, the upper back is "espalda" (the French cognate=20 > means "shoulder", which is also the first sense in Vel=E1zquez), the lowe= r=20 > is "lomo", and the whole thing is "dorso", but I've heard people call the= =20 > whole back "espalda" and not know the word "dorso". Also the "s" is silen= t=20 > in=20 > French "dos".=20 > > Pierre=20 > --=20 > I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.=20 > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/L_57ldscfH0J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_595_29287646.1345564576832 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:33:46 PM UTC+4, Pierre Abbat wrote:On Tuesday 21 August 2012 11:07:= 36 la gleki wrote:
> For "stomach" we get
>   cmn vei 0.253388  eng beli 0.22019  spa bientre 0= .097425  ara muada
> 0.092683  hin pet 0.087398  ben pet 0.058401  rus j= eludyk 0.053388  por
> bariga 0.050271  jap xara 0.033198  pun pet 0.028692 &nb= sp;deu magen 0.028184
> fra vontr 0.025474
> With first 4 languages it outputs
>   *vreli velti venli velbi* 0.691286 (rating)  With all = 12 languages it
>  outputs  *vetli* 0.535
> (rating)
>
>
> I'd choose {vetli} as it's similar to Chinese vei, English belly, = Indian
> "pet" and Romance "ventr-"

I would use neither "belly" nor "vientre", as they mean "betfu" which w= e=20
already have. The Spanish for "stomach" is "est=F3mago". "slamycanti" w= as=20
proposed some years ago.
Robin asked me to add them to jvs but I see now he wa= s too hasty.

> For "back of human body" we get
>  cmn beiji 0.253388  eng bak 0.22019  spa espalda 0= .097425  ara vyxra
> 0.092683  hin pic 0.087398  ben pic 0.058401  rus s= pin 0.053388  por kostas
> 0.050271  jap se 0.033198  pun pic 0.028692  deu ri= uk 0.028184  fra dos
> 0.025474
>  Top score is  bekpi bajdi 0.50684 4 langs    = bekpi 0.4697 12 langs
> I'd choose {bekpi} which reminds me of Chinese bei, English back, = Indian
> pic and Russian sPIna.

I agree that we need a word to distinguish back, the dorsal side of an = animal,=20
from back, the area behind something. They are the same side for a huma= n, but=20
not for most vertebrates. This word sounds good. Also, I think we need = a word=20
for the ventral side of an animal.

Pedantically, the upper back is "espalda" (the French cognate=20
means "shoulder", which is also the first sense in Vel=E1zquez), the lo= wer=20
is "lomo", and the whole thing is "dorso", but I've heard people call t= he=20
whole back "espalda" and not know the word "dorso". Also the "s" is sil= ent in=20
French "dos".

Pierre
--=20
I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/L_= 57ldscfH0J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_595_29287646.1345564576832--