Received: from mail-wg0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:45849) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T4qrm-0002a4-7Y; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:12:04 -0700 Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13sf523225wgb.16 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=0e4YHy2c/dFy6SqGS6eoE8ahwWyvXCVYBEVeKnbxPB8=; b=e0R6oc1KE8Mayb3lRoAl9c6oL+WYJYCJUSEEO5R8nJvGZf7HKvXfcnxlC1bjqyWf3l 6NyBfzpQedopyDSYZmj0LeHuERu3/L2cL7/mdsA417GM3CtpQ9tUQH1VYrFhMFZAcvLU dLySNH9dZ6VgzPaiZbamduXXj8MTeTe8WOugTaE26s6IyenD2xbEG4rvyM/Vm+RHHaUr 3kiDc7N6zNg+2B1LvIH81PEBCqsL2EGHTi/79h9Y5/KoJnFhtkDzGKqOSn7EvCOLRcJM mU/5WR1+m1PZHrEtNMYllv8J2Bt2IQnzTOY8amCd2RPkURsodaiDBtgiIaBSuJRqUPad VnAA== Received: by 10.205.134.132 with SMTP id ic4mr248335bkc.28.1345803102412; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.129.214 with SMTP id p22ls1174455bks.7.gmail; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.128.207 with SMTP id l15mr546010bks.4.1345803101450; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.128.207 with SMTP id l15mr546008bks.4.1345803101427; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q3si2386595bkv.1.2012.08.24.03.11.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.54; Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12so1673378lag.27 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.26.99 with SMTP id k3mr1782763lbg.9.1345803100956; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.24.70 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:11:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4bce1b85-1742-4819-bebf-3f3ffe9162e2@googlegroups.com> <1344787920.72396.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <9c8f151a-c423-4d97-9f5c-d2c5fcade18c@googlegroups.com> <502880CD.8070301@gmail.com> <9bab9050-eb6b-45e5-ab08-9b982d8746dc@googlegroups.com> <5036B43B.8040703@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:11:40 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Direction of Rotation From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554dc1ac5274204c800334a X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec554dc1ac5274204c800334a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No official decision will be made (Robin won't make up his mind) until someone goes through the corpus and determine how the proposed change affects past usage. I imagine that it may be allowable to ignore uses on IRC, but it's not my call. The official decision regards the following: > In other words, going from: > > carna : x1 turns/rotates/revolves around axis x2 in direction x3. > > To: > carna : x1 turns from x2 to x3 > > gutni : x1 is rotating counter-clockwise viewed from orientation x2 about > rotational axis/axes (set if multiple) x3 I believe there is still some debate over whether we should insert a place between x1 and x2 for "right" and "left" rotational motion, or to have one word for each, "clockwise" having the exact same place structure as counter-clockwise, and the gismu form "ramli": gutni : x1 is rotating clockwise viewed from orientation x2 about rotational axis/axes (set if multiple) x3 I favor two words, myself. I don't see the point in having a place in a relationship that can only be filled by two values. On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:50 AM, la .lindar. wrote: > Do we have a result yet? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/i63Y-2qNVKQJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec554dc1ac5274204c800334a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No official decision will be made (Robin won't make up his mind) until = someone goes through the corpus and determine how the proposed change affec= ts past usage. I imagine that it may be allowable to ignore uses on IRC, bu= t it's not my call.

The official decision regards the following:

> In other words= , going from:
>
> carna : x1 turns/rotates/revolves around axis x2 in direction = x3.
>
> To:
> carna : x1 turns from x2 to x3
>
> gutni : x1 is rotating counter-clockwise viewed from orientation x2 ab= out
> rotational axis/axes (set if multiple) x3

I believe there is st= ill some debate over whether we should insert a place between x1 and x2 for= "right" and "left" rotational motion, or to have one w= ord for each, "clockwise" having the exact same place structure a= s counter-clockwise, and the gismu form "ramli":

gutni : x1 is rotating clockwise viewed from orientation x2 about rotat= ional axis/axes (set if multiple) x3

I favor two words, myself. I do= n't see the point in having a place in a relationship that can only be = filled by two values.

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:50 AM, la .lindar.= <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
Do we have a result yet?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/i63Y-2qNVKQJ.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec554dc1ac5274204c800334a--