Received: from mail-fa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:50739) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T5i1n-0002Hc-Sd; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:51 -0700 Received: by fada11 with SMTP id a11sf1225209fad.16 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vs9FDxPcf1sT4IZ5eTloCJzUdWL98UMJXcEsOBl+hjI=; b=JFMwst2eZe7A8fzBtSC357VDo3p3W6qw/AoxT05UQ4AWTI1oUWksEXG+HviF+zIXJh REadgKXddHY9CwDmXxpcFaxVpk77nZ3hlNPXHd9ajxdA2oxn1Q1NSArKje+IRvnkuW0N 8b3HbEHePQ2LwBanv2UgXowOoJ+oqyQ8p0LzG1TKVfsBLyhOvEt6ZH47wIyz9zYFc4dA z2QN9ECa0puB92FQuk3Jht95aVwfcfMvC8RLdXSzf0CIh9JeZoasLTW9SbTmJgSMU3F8 /+zSwK7YewRHMf9N5ErcIUzienOHbjlUeVbQ8n9A5KB2lFnyyXDm7K0IrMKhpYvzRMpL 75Kg== Received: by 10.216.135.20 with SMTP id t20mr165828wei.81.1346007452138; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:32 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.14.209.195 with SMTP id s43ls869876eeo.5.gmail; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.2.130 with SMTP id 2mr8346855eef.1.1346007451481; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.2.130 with SMTP id 2mr8346854eef.1.1346007451471; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5si22497215eep.0.2012.08.26.11.57.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.53; Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so629299eek.12 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.193.136 with SMTP id k8mr14023269een.9.1346007451324; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.77] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a7sm46064355eep.14.2012.08.26.11.57.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <503A7198.1040701@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:57:28 +0100 From: And Rosta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Zombie References: <000e0cd5187e58762a04c77bb7d6@google.com> <502ED43E.1060804@gmail.com> <502F7031.5050702@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / iesk, On 18/08/2012 14:44: > Given that Lojban is 'complete' (baselined) and Lojban phonotactics don't= forbid {ii} in that position, I guess this exchangue of opinions is about = the phonaesthetics of a word like {dzombii}, right? Otherwise I can=E2=80= =99t see why the relative difficulties speakers of various linguistic backg= rounds might have pronouncing it could be relevant. > > After all, Lojban just isn=E2=80=99t very easy to pronounce. (On the cont= rary, I find it surprisingly difficult.) Why is the relative ease or difficulty of distinguishing {ii} and {uu} from= {i} and {u} not relevant? --And. > > iesk > > Le samedi 18 ao=C3=BBt 2012 12:36:33 UTC+2, And Rosta a =C3=A9crit : > > Jonathan Jones, On 18/08/2012 01:28: > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:31 PM, And Rosta > wrote: > > Jonathan Jones, On 17/08/2012 21:19: > > > > It shouldn't be difficult at in Lojban. {ii} is a diphthong > > pronounced "YEE", {i} is a vowel pronounced "EE". > > > > > > ...and that's easy only for native anglophones, helped by the diph= thongal character of "EE" in most accents. > > > > > > I highly doubt that. The consonant-y sound appears in a whole vari= ety of languages.While Japanese doesn't have "yi", it does have =E3=82=84"y= a", =E3=82=86"yu", and =E3=82=88"yo", which are distinctive sounds from =E3= =81=82"a", =E3=81=86"u", and =E3=81=8A"o". > > You transmute healthy skepticism into pigheadedness. Why the gap at "= yi"? What is the phonetic difference between {i} and {ii} and why do you su= ppose it to be easy? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/= lojban/-/CWKDnBx6TZkJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegr= oups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojb= an?hl=3Den. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.