Received: from mail-bk0-f61.google.com ([209.85.214.61]:43156) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T5jAu-00033E-40; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:23 -0700 Received: by bkwj4 with SMTP id j4sf1230511bkw.16 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=hY2Uc3kmpVFaBsMzB9o9d8JxcE0lsEyJ5McO+Jxxhkk=; b=TNsfrRolBfQ9rUEEPEnmY5SK5LSZECza5AxOv83AtND6KScny4qUrKjG3M6dHTOLsf Kj2AzUe0VP/bWu4Ely4Q7TVW8PfTYQImO0xBVB7Yjyrjg081tQt7susRmMEOMteg51j/ Gtmd6DYGdl63gxIrCh8E8LFrtqYIgm/i/iEptAYIxQcy+2SmgcLlRLCj/uIChxFpLuh9 r2oCWBna7ResbLcX/ev4Ro2RbwUYiImBI6PfZ2aRSyCLpq1vGWkLOSGaknZZCDB4lu52 j5yICQJFbe4QDO/ihQbAEtEriki6RKVEztUHHFvSQssut6g8IcqlbF7Q8HVd3P9OPLlh B/Ig== Received: by 10.204.153.214 with SMTP id l22mr575554bkw.3.1346011864291; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.4.74 with SMTP id 10ls2304274bkq.0.gmail; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.130.14 with SMTP id hk14mr1192472bkc.5.1346011863323; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.130.14 with SMTP id hk14mr1192471bkc.5.1346011863303; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q3si4062703bkv.1.2012.08.26.13.11.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.174; Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id gj3so2126711lbb.5 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.46.135 with SMTP id v7mr5597713lbm.3.1346011863037; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.24.70 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Aug 2012 13:11:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <503A380E.8030406@gmx.de> References: <201208261026.55969.phma@phma.optus.nu> <503A380E.8030406@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:11:02 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] quantifier with "la" From: Jonathan Jones To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec55240bef5b86d04c830ce55 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec55240bef5b86d04c830ce55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:51 AM, selpa'i wrote: > Am 26.08.2012 16:26, schrieb Pierre Abbat: > > "la so pintupi cu bevri lo kanguru": Does this mean that all nine >> individually >> carried kangaroos? >> > > The inner quantifier is part of the name, so it means "The Nine Pintupi", > but it doesn't tell us how many there are. They could carry them > individually, but we don't know. > > You can force distributivity with an outer quantifier: "ro la so pintupi". > To make it explicitly collective, you could say "lu'o la so pintupi". > In both cases, we don't know how many pintupi there are. > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > Yeah, there were four people in "The Three Musketeers", for example. -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec55240bef5b86d04c830ce55 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:51 AM, selpa'i <sela= dwa@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 26.08.2012 16:26, schrieb Pierre Abbat:

"la so pintupi cu bevri lo kanguru": Does this mean that all nine= individually
carried kangaroos?

The inner quantifier is part of the name, so it means "The Nine Pintup= i", but it doesn't tell us how many there are. They could carry th= em individually, but we don't know.

You can force distributivity with an outer quantifier: "ro la so pintu= pi".
To make it explicitly collective, you could say "lu'o la so pintup= i".
In both cases, we don't know how many pintupi there are.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

Yeah, there were= four people in "The Three Musketeers", for example.

-- mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa = bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am yo= ur father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec55240bef5b86d04c830ce55--