Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:34786) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T62D6-0004tw-25; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:30:56 -0700 Received: by eeke49 with SMTP id e49sf1530984eek.16 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=lRu4UqMClbmibECiA2OnkeWpGKPizLmAaaX1r30x+7s=; b=JJTfJj8VZz406xBd6XUyRcJO6HrNjisqDppF8CoJYV/Kaz/4UnqbZR4PB6xNZYBVp/ 007m7oenuF9Pe5JEfMcvFW7OLatFAXNgIWmydUA6Q70fq9gVF7RPjjzOoA4MyMVfceM2 FQ719jgbrDRWXc+3MpUBsC1iBV+mwzbsax03ukpTypDIYKgB+sYEAfVXUpCCPAQDMUHf sUyKUtH/PHnnULq7d8wflGFTt2Uu/49Rr7/IUq2zlMPZyyfvP93hcDgqtFx9GD+feBW3 rgBck5RsHnGDOcy/PgFG6yjixvPmyPmW94YAzf8xG582qR6AGLc21z/JoA+Nkl0SIH/9 YGuQ== Received: by 10.216.243.12 with SMTP id j12mr278599wer.88.1346085036306; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:30:36 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.96.67 with SMTP id dq3ls3165280wib.1.gmail; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.241.9 with SMTP id f9mr805882wer.5.1346085035552; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.241.9 with SMTP id f9mr805881wer.5.1346085035531; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.23]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id cd1si10553wib.1.2012.08.27.09.30.35; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2012 16:30:34 -0000 Received: from p57A0905E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.144.94] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 27 Aug 2012 18:30:34 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18rLjodEZgrngUIhZq9Jstn2o5kr09TPWiYxDWxJ4 EQK4GxkkB6QBsm Message-ID: <503BA0AA.1030709@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:30:34 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] "Any" and {ro} References: <44e6fb5c-91f3-47ba-817c-8560c9c6ca14@googlegroups.com> <502B9E61.8060808@gmx.de> <502BA634.3030007@gmx.de> <502C50EB.3090704@gmail.com> <7e604d79-8ecd-4690-bc39-bf48b601d46f@googlegroups.com> <5036D423.5050101@gmail.com> <5038CEC3.4050708@gmail.com> <5039204B.1060401@gmail.com> <325f818f-76ce-4f3c-b0c0-03dc4db2e9d8@googlegroups.com> <503B8ED4.200@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Am 27.08.2012 18:00, schrieb la gleki: > > I was hinting at a scale (specific/ non-specific). It's something that > was completely lost after xorlo reform ({le} meant some objects that I > have in mind and therefore worked much like an attitudinal. I'm not > suggesting restoring pre-xorlo rules, of course). lo is as specific as you want it to be, you can pick the zo'e. da is never specific, because it has no value. > > I must acknowledge that {ro da zo'u mi su'omu'ei citka da} solves the > problem (and I want exactly this sentence rephrased without {zo'u} > like it's possible to do in English). > But if adding {e'o} turns it into "For every bunch of apples, make it > the case that you could give me three out of the bunch." > then it's not a solution. Why for every bunch? Don't you want three apples from this particular basket? > "any" (in this sense) is {su'o} number of apples from the set in the > basket. > > If we have 4 apples (numbered from 1 to 4) then "Give me three apples > from the basket" would mean in all possible worlds ({romu'ei} ?) one > of the following: > 123 > 124 > 134 > 234 > > So here "Give me any three apples" = "In every possible world give me > exactly three apples out of the 4 from that basket." Using ro mu'ei for this is quite extreme. It would include worlds in which one of the persons got shot, and still you want that other person to give you the apples anyway. I don't think mu'ei is at all needed here, and it's awkward to involve possible words in a command as concrete as the one at hand. ko dunda ci plise [pe lo lanka] mi "Make it true that you give me three apples from the basket, it doesn't matter which three." "Give me any three apples from the basket." Adding ro mu'ei would be a nice way to make this very impolite and bossy. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i -- pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo ^:i \jl /flr sen |ziu \su xn go kror ^:i \sym tfn /zu viw \xn jy ^jaiw -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.