Received: from mail-ee0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]:55976) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T6T5R-0004fO-D5; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:41 -0700 Received: by eeke49 with SMTP id e49sf2077574eek.16 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IdPwbY2uomoR7TvxmM6yJuQiKZVspzHsEzr9/P2RvC0=; b=x6cEPvRxtNGO+KONp1w1Rqvkwz5D2UBqC+gB4C21UAh33Knb7exPJOG23oqFDTO8qc QTPuunA8ikiYQTWCy4C7CvbB7FrTsB7htmfYMzzd4qrjNdKjE8CqcjitlAFiie0Nv2vc J/AGYhrQojWXIvB8Lqxi8UY6Fp9jcohEXVCt4wbihtTHd4+c/9pjfF4OzciUvpOvNfYW /+CaGxXbuih1zqornUzJwpBgwYzjqNg6XMloIWRCplIz8kBnTrTG+SNRmJ7MGNMAD+uk zj1kGJHD+7X6f4yFH6rZHNnyS7BZ5naioh3IMtlxT9Ufh2YTGsZfvzvEedjz5UAyDGLI Hw5A== Received: by 10.216.85.204 with SMTP id u54mr415226wee.75.1346188342689; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.212.2 with SMTP id x2ls1204543weo.2.gmail; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.96.42 with SMTP id dp10mr2638993wib.2.1346188341925; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.96.42 with SMTP id dp10mr2638992wib.2.1346188341916; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.23]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id cx9si861074wib.0.2012.08.28.14.12.21; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2012 21:12:21 -0000 Received: from p57A08C7E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.140.126] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 28 Aug 2012 23:12:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+BoldfWP2BUgwrgEL26G9L9mnqM8QoCR3bkat003 YKy62FJtK3DcEO Message-ID: <503D3434.3080903@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:12:20 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] la .alis. References: <2320FCB7-86FE-4E30-9F24-DAD6E40024D7@evertype.com> <925d17561003280714y30d5eb1fo19b9f97eb6902eaa@mail.gmail.com> <4BAF7446.6070008@gmail.com> <20100328192909.GG6600@digitalkingdom.org> <925d17561003281729t30ffbfcbge6209c18f8d01d36@mail.gmail.com> <06B70573-D388-4FA0-8F64-9BB9FFAFB2EC@gmail.com> <503D2DFB.10202@gmx.de> <55d4be2d-d8f0-47bf-a8f9-c449b79a7e0b@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <55d4be2d-d8f0-47bf-a8f9-c449b79a7e0b@googlegroups.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Am 28.08.2012 23:04, schrieb iesk: > Thank you, la selpa'i. I will investigate that. If Jorge and you agree on= it, I have no reasonable doubts. > > I guess that glottal-stopping is not wrong, though? I prefer it that way. Inserting glottal stops between words is always allowed. > Does not {la uiski ui} otherwise become /lau,iskiu,i/, with confusing dip= hthongs? Is that desirable? That cannot happen. The stress is on the first syllable of "uiski": {la=20 uiski ui}. If you leave out the spaces, you get {lau=C4=97skiui}, which can= =20 only fragment into la uiski ui because: 1) "lau=C4=97ski" can't be a single word, because the stress is on UIski, a= nd=20 the la falls off due to tosmabru 2) the trailing "ui" can not be part of uiski because again the stress=20 makes everything after the next syllable fall off. Also, the u of "ui"=20 cannot be part of uiski (*"uiskiu") because that's not a legal word=20 (remember that it would have to be pronounced [wiskiw], which is=20 illegal. And the i couldn't possibly be seperate either, because [i]=20 alone doesn't constitute a legal lojban word, as Lojban words can't=20 begin in a vowel. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i --=20 pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo ^:i \jl /flr sen |ziu \su xn go kror ^:i \sym tfn /zu viw \xn jy ^jaiw --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.