Received: from mail-we0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]:60038)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCL3SuIvlExCz_vSBBRoE-BFWRQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1T6Tog-00059G-VQ; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:59:37 -0700
Received: by weyu3 with SMTP id u3sf2101342wey.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id
         :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=S/TieBF+JDrYNPXKJVXdnrSzG3mtNGOM/3QVbEMxa+U=;
        b=nqYyHuj/TL9kRjBnteq2grBOcsc1lTXNMMtChR45qNjhPniQTUJN4xnRBaGgypIkUH
         EvaCq9t/LuZ0Tfv8lmv6OCAXZV3Gk+pNOLyFDgGmzpwuuRcxA9bUu39S3fOikRXTXyAY
         1FqB0zpDthF9kCmJ3xr837Gi5owmVqG3A1OToBWy/JXvuvOaqHZxvROcc3Ei2CoMJeTr
         0LhSieC7sEAlgTWeaKabYvOKP06es+I4RPf/ccSgV3I80WT60PJQpfY2os/FM4iTp0YL
         csquglocj8WTbZ3hb+TtGPqS+5paakmF03gBtkhKOJCpRHeYuk/d0WYltZBE6EiUUanp
         C6/g==
Received: by 10.180.105.232 with SMTP id gp8mr2036089wib.0.1346191155189;
        Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.73.226 with SMTP id o2ls1246388wiv.0.gmail; Tue, 28 Aug
 2012 14:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.235.32 with SMTP id t32mr1058742weq.7.1346191154457;
        Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.235.32 with SMTP id t32mr1058741weq.7.1346191154432;
        Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.22])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id fa8si874764wid.1.2012.08.28.14.59.14;
        Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.22;
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2012 21:59:14 -0000
Received: from p57A08C7E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.140.126]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 28 Aug 2012 23:59:14 +0200
X-Authenticated: #54293076
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18kjBpgOY4kOCQ2qf9JH4yyL4cyUIRLqOrikP3xYU
	yPl4nQOvXfZlKb
Message-ID: <503D3F2C.40001@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:59:08 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] "Any" and {ro}
References: <5038CEC3.4050708@gmail.com> <c3a1363a-5094-4633-86c0-38c6c383665f@googlegroups.com> <5039204B.1060401@gmail.com> <325f818f-76ce-4f3c-b0c0-03dc4db2e9d8@googlegroups.com> <503B8ED4.200@gmail.com> <f9e39122-b072-4aa4-8aab-86657bcaebb0@googlegroups.com> <9019D4E1-8993-4AF4-BD70-AC76E5A9620F@yahoo.com> <eeef465e-467b-428e-9d7b-f95baf39ee8c@googlegroups.com> <1346161778.18681.YahooMailNeo@web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <b3dff172-ec6d-4f8d-affd-9ef8c0f238f0@googlegroups.com> <20120828201927.GI25027@samsa> <503D28D0.5070206@gmx.de> <1346190689.50010.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1346190689.50010.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------060006000404000507040209"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060006000404000507040209
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Am 28.08.2012 23:51, schrieb John E Clifford:
> So now the only distinction between {le} and {lo} is veridicality?

I can't speak for anybody else, but to me this distinction is 
irrelevant. "lo" is usually veridical, which means you call things "lo 
broda" that you think brodas. However, you can just as easily use lo 
broda for something that you aren't sure brodas, .i.e "lo ru'a broda" - 
"something that I assume brodas". Because of this, veridicality is not 
something that we need "le" for either. I personally have no use for 
"le" (which is why I think it would be better to reassign it a new 
(unrelated) function, but this would digress too far from the topic of 
this thread.)

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

-- 
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

^:i \jl /flr sen |ziu \su xn go kror
^:i \sym tfn /zu viw \xn jy ^jaiw

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--------------060006000404000507040209
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>Am 28.08.2012 23:51, schrieb John E
        Clifford:<br>
      </tt></div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:1346190689.50010.YahooMailNeo@web184402.mail.bf1.yahoo.com"
      type="cite">
      <div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times
        new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><tt>So now the
          <span style="font-style: italic;">only</span> distinction
          between {le} and {lo} is veridicality?<br>
        </tt></div>
    </blockquote>
    <tt><br>
      I can't speak for anybody else, but to me this distinction is
      irrelevant. "lo" is usually veridical, which means you call things
      "lo broda" that you think brodas. However, you can just as easily
      use lo broda for something that you aren't sure brodas, .i.e "lo
      ru'a broda" - "something that I assume brodas". Because of this,
      veridicality is not something that we need "le" for either. I
      personally have no use for "le" (which is why I think it would be
      better to reassign it a new (unrelated) function, but this would
      digress too far from the topic of this thread.)<br>
      <br>
      mu'o mi'e la selpa'i<br>
    </tt>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72"><tt>-- 
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

^:i \jl /flr sen |ziu \su xn go kror
^:i \sym tfn /zu viw \xn jy ^jaiw</tt></pre>
  </body>
</html>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.<br />



--------------060006000404000507040209--