Received: from mail-ey0-f189.google.com ([209.85.215.189]:48628)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCNuStaWoDxDdj4WCBRoETtZ92w@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1T7aaa-0001bt-Rl; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:32 -0700
Received: by eaan13 with SMTP id n13sf1160006eaa.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent
         :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=uSeaVs7DF7dtL92uvM/mKSlwCIX+AguEPIyZr/QdA7E=;
        b=FhVsPcq6xaecOBUnGYxLjee0if7KGDtl6HLCeVmvj7fN+JRf2mgtoerMjel0Tebn+m
         NottdNahYgO8/bOo1DQyvuspZ/UH1AanFL2VGQ9vcQjUzEA8bnaJISV+F8LIxyqEUBHv
         yNqghRc/4jUHinJ6SOJ6CpXzawDF6LlfitT4H+3TvDNXdnt4QMcatxMk7fA6mu2U4KgM
         hB1IsbAX+4FbmM9yjbFqEQ/PH0ngMOOnuzACV+UHZLIw9u0MGOkU4d7pn4aFEzkEy6AK
         OPXXq7RoHlCdaNUs7NNeF3PvHHCoMScJ5wdHnI1EJsObYSDNdDxTFwYiX7qDCWwGui1h
         HnKg==
Received: by 10.180.84.230 with SMTP id c6mr459715wiz.2.1346455517207;
        Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.216.211.133 with SMTP id w5ls5184717weo.8.gmail; Fri, 31 Aug
 2012 16:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.181.11.234 with SMTP id el10mr675388wid.2.1346455516365;
        Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.181.11.234 with SMTP id el10mr675387wid.2.1346455516357;
        Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (mail-we0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e5si432565wiw.0.2012.08.31.16.25.16
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.170;
Received: by weyr1 with SMTP id r1so1716066wey.15
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.86.106 with SMTP id o10mr7500568wiz.22.1346455516253;
        Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.77] (87-194-76-177.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.76.177])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w7sm3611277wiz.0.2012.08.31.16.25.14
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <504147D9.7070900@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 00:25:13 +0100
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Revising mu'ei and CAhA once again. Possible worlds.
References: <e09a669e-9fdd-47c1-968a-014ec72e933e@googlegroups.com> <502A81EB.2000005@gmail.com> <fbfa4089-61e9-4b2a-b858-8ec8b42f85bd@googlegroups.com> <502A9A2C.20606@gmail.com> <55e70b7d-e835-423b-8557-8ae88b88a4e2@googlegroups.com> <504112FA.4010001@gmail.com> <1346454346.99385.YahooMailNeo@web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1346454346.99385.YahooMailNeo@web184406.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

John E Clifford, On 01/09/2012 00:05:
> Using {da'i} with truth-functional connectives is, of course,
> dissonant, since a {da'i} sentence has no truth value.

The propositional content of a da'i sentence does have a truth-value, and may contain truth-functional connectives. But the speaker is making no claim about what that truth value is. This holds not just for da'i but for most illocutionary UI.

--And.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.