Received: from mail-ie0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:34482) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T7mma-0007Z3-D1; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 05:26:41 -0700 Received: by ieak10 with SMTP id k10sf755045iea.16 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 05:26:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=f0h3+3QhrkqAHleBChSzaAvr6UHXaD8YDKzTrfsgYK0=; b=SF2nYSoHmRiQfkm6ZqGnwqjqFuOSDPg3WrKmlcMsjWdS0i8MZuXFUVX8LC7HZzUykE mx8JIWFQJ+Nd8f1u93xCiAKijpBYn9pIvhSdriidLXIE4IyqVpo6HQA8cGYrL5zmTkEh gZoeHlMnZKx2fUjo8GIzEaIaggq358XOa4qPXCHpPLBVcuiIs5JE42FqJynpaetj2cBH 9wv5Stto+DoaKyyMIMnNAUPdWQfqK74uiuewgNjkMUgsvfjrkiBtyAS3qJm96bt/U1jz yFTIusZclrG1L1sYTMXmtSP9tqyLN4HTIt8AeKx2NhRccN7/w/5vz/QR0M2uy3RWJtTj A4ww== Received: by 10.236.173.202 with SMTP id v50mr1069508yhl.19.1346502389519; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 05:26:29 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.78.164 with SMTP id g24ls6061817yhe.6.gmail; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 05:26:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.142.211 with SMTP id i59mr1059287yhj.1.1346502388972; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 05:26:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 05:26:28 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <2a7beba8-e0dd-42f4-a641-a0dace5a2e4d@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <8d3fb774-f4ff-4b86-afa2-df153de2f633@googlegroups.com> <10cd53d6-5aa9-40be-a1f9-2f5ad3115159@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any real diffrence between hope (.a'o) and desire (.au)? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3180_4196461.1346502388532" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_3180_4196461.1346502388532 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Saturday, September 1, 2012 4:03:52 PM UTC+4, tijlan wrote: > > On 30 August 2012 17:32, la gleki > > wrote: > > Can't we clearly define UI in terms of {sei broda} after all? > > So you are saying that {.a'o}={sei kanpe je djica}, right? > > {a'o} and {kanpe je djica} seem to generally mean the same kind of > emotion, yes. > > Some notes: > {ui} is a direct expression of happiness, whereas {(zo'e) gleki} is a > descriptive statement that someone feels / felt / will feel happiness > -- same emotion, different functions. Also, with {ui}, the experiencer > is the speaker by default; with {sei gleki}, it can be non-speakers. > {sei gleki} can be used to translate adverbial stuff, such as > "happily", whose explicit or implicit subject (x1) can be other than > the speaker. So, the {sei broda} form cannot always substitute for or > define UI. > Well, I guess {.ei=sei bilga} not {.ei=sei mi bilga} ? I want all UI-cmavo translated to {sei ko'a broda} form. > > > Can you also derive {.ai} from {.au}? > > Does {ai} always imply {au}? Probably not. One can intend but not want > to pay a tax. > Does {au} always imply {ai}? Probably not. One can want but not intend > to go to Mars. > > > mu'o > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/vSbmaaQHC18J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_3180_4196461.1346502388532 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Saturday, September 1, 2012 4:03:52 PM UTC+4, tijlan wrote:On 30 August 2012 17:32, la gleki &= lt;gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can't we clearly define UI in terms of {sei broda} after all?
> So you are saying that {.a'o}=3D{sei kanpe je djica}, right?

{a'o} and {kanpe je djica} seem to generally mean the same kind of emot= ion, yes.

Some notes:
{ui} is a direct expression of happiness, whereas {(zo'e) gleki} is a
descriptive statement that someone feels / felt / will feel happiness
-- same emotion, different functions. Also, with {ui}, the experiencer
is the speaker by default; with {sei gleki}, it can be non-speakers.
{sei gleki} can be used to translate adverbial stuff, such as
"happily", whose explicit or implicit subject (x1) can be other than
the speaker. So, the {sei broda} form cannot always substitute for or
define UI.
 
Well, I guess {.ei=3Dsei bilga} not = {.ei=3Dsei mi bilga} ?
I want all UI-cmavo translated to {sei ko'= a broda} form.




> Can you also derive {.ai} from {.au}?

Does {ai} always imply {au}? Probably not. One can intend but not want
to pay a tax.
Does {au} always imply {ai}? Probably not. One can want but not intend
to go to Mars.


mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/vS= bmaaQHC18J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_3180_4196461.1346502388532--