Received: from mail-ob0-f189.google.com ([209.85.214.189]:40817) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T7pWF-0002Om-Uv; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:22:07 -0700 Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3sf3543760obb.16 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:21:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=B1YOJTNaF8FqCHI3una7GTtOKRNGlxN0zLrhiP+bcqg=; b=vFZhYNoYj9jFG5/c5kWXn11XwusVCghEHkFrJL8bZ+Z1HkYVkwscyMlQ9qq8b7aAya UQR7JAerB2dxCTAJvpqNsXCiZGEK+MQn6qcLurEE5YgKO1gyFraiGuK0v7KsV/GOnobH kT/xJXWZpILcRfvR70ubUIPxhUSsYsVxR5hiUNMZcAPwKnjX7jtjlu6JZ8Vy+TPfwxjY hvouCnCmFI+Mk4feE2V/YwD2pYfP2rm9rbbWCcKqYvMA9Y4MvZIJQtRLtK3AJAancaDF 6LLxJJn4xEdFV/IXg/Xw+HPpLwRQWrns9gK85uw0kBx82aMIhgBB6GmKDyrLuO10pmiL ywZQ== Received: by 10.236.192.164 with SMTP id i24mr1078105yhn.14.1346512909346; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:21:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.78.164 with SMTP id g24ls6157553yhe.6.gmail; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.154.194 with SMTP id h42mr1090361yhk.8.1346512908838; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Cc: John E Clifford Message-Id: <99836ca6-bbb5-4cf7-a2cf-0679d9576e28@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1346510672.82633.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <8d3fb774-f4ff-4b86-afa2-df153de2f633@googlegroups.com> <10cd53d6-5aa9-40be-a1f9-2f5ad3115159@googlegroups.com> <2a7beba8-e0dd-42f4-a641-a0dace5a2e4d@googlegroups.com> <1b189a5d-34a1-40be-9b40-a003ff1ad06a@googlegroups.com> <1346510672.82633.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any real diffrence between hope (.a'o) and desire (.au)? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_808_27643708.1346512908417" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_808_27643708.1346512908417 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Saturday, September 1, 2012 6:44:34 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote: > > I suppose the idea here is {sei} as a sort of stage direction, the usual > "Alice said" supplemented now by comments about Alice's presumed state of > mind. Using this for {a'o} and the like seems misguided, because 1) they > are not metalinguistic, but part of the speech stream -- not someone els'e > remark, but the speakers expression; 2) they are not truthvalued, as the > {sei} comments are. > Isn't {sei} the same as loglandic {{soi crano}} etc.? > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* triliyn > > *To:* loj...@googlegroups.com > *Sent:* Saturday, September 1, 2012 8:37 AM > *Subject:* Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any real diffrence between hope > (.a'o) and desire (.au)? > > I've always thought of {sei} as introducing a comment about the text > without regard for the meaning of the text. For example, you could say > {broda sei mu da lerfu}, and {broda sei xlali} should be taken to mean "I > think {broda} was a bad word choice". > > On Saturday, September 1, 2012 8:26:28 AM UTC-4, la gleki wrote: > > > > On Saturday, September 1, 2012 4:03:52 PM UTC+4, tijlan wrote: > > On 30 August 2012 17:32, la gleki wrote: > > Can't we clearly define UI in terms of {sei broda} after all? > > So you are saying that {.a'o}={sei kanpe je djica}, right? > > {a'o} and {kanpe je djica} seem to generally mean the same kind of > emotion, yes. > > Some notes: > {ui} is a direct expression of happiness, whereas {(zo'e) gleki} is a > descriptive statement that someone feels / felt / will feel happiness > -- same emotion, different functions. Also, with {ui}, the experiencer > is the speaker by default; with {sei gleki}, it can be non-speakers. > {sei gleki} can be used to translate adverbial stuff, such as > "happily", whose explicit or implicit subject (x1) can be other than > the speaker. So, the {sei broda} form cannot always substitute for or > define UI. > > > Well, I guess {.ei=sei bilga} not {.ei=sei mi bilga} ? > I want all UI-cmavo translated to {sei ko'a broda} form. > > > > > > Can you also derive {.ai} from {.au}? > > Does {ai} always imply {au}? Probably not. One can intend but not want > to pay a tax. > Does {au} always imply {ai}? Probably not. One can want but not intend > to go to Mars. > > > mu'o > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/7bozf9oQjSwJ. > To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+un...@googlegroups.com . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/-4h4kd3UlHoJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_808_27643708.1346512908417 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Saturday, September 1, 2012 6:44:34 PM UTC+4, clifford wrote:
I suppose the idea here is {sei} as a sort of stage direction, the= usual "Alice said" supplemented now by comments about Alice's presumed sta= te of mind.  Using this for {a'o} and the like seems misguided, becaus= e 1) they are not metalinguistic, but part of the speech stream -- not some= one els'e remark, but the speakers expression; 2) they are not truthvalued,= as the {sei} comments are.

Isn't {sei} the same as loglandic {{soi crano}} etc.?



From: triliyn <trillio...@gmail.com>
<= b>To: loj...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any real d= iffrence between hope (.a'o) and desire (.au)?

I've always thought of {sei} as introducing a comment about the text w= ithout regard for the meaning of the text. For example, you could say {brod= a sei mu da lerfu}, and {broda sei xlali} should be taken to mean "I think = {broda} was a bad word choice".

On Saturday, September 1, 2012 8:26:= 28 AM UTC-4, la gleki wrote:


On Saturday, Septembe= r 1, 2012 4:03:52 PM UTC+4, tijlan wrote:
On 30 August 201= 2 17:32, la gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wro= te:
> Can't we clearly define UI in terms of {sei broda} after all?
> So you are saying that {.a'o}=3D{sei kanpe je djica}, right?

{a'o} and {kanpe je djica} seem to generally mean the same kind of emot= ion, yes.

Some notes:
{ui} is a direct expression of happiness, whereas {(zo'e) gleki} is a
descriptive statement that someone feels / felt / will feel happiness
-- same emotion, different functions. Also, with {ui}, the experiencer
is the speaker by default; with {sei gleki}, it can be non-speakers.
{sei gleki} can be used to translate adverbial stuff, such as
"happily", whose explicit or implicit subject (x1) can be other than
the speaker. So, the {sei broda} form cannot always substitute for or
define UI.
 
Well, I guess {.ei=3Dsei bilga} not = {.ei=3Dsei mi bilga} ?
I want all UI-cmavo translated to {sei ko'= a broda} form.




> Can you also derive {.ai} from {.au}?

Does {ai} always imply {au}? Probably not. One can intend but not want
to pay a tax.
Does {au} always imply {ai}? Probably not. One can want but not intend
to go to Mars.


mu'o
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://= groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/7bozf9oQjSwJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googl= egroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/= lojban?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/-4= h4kd3UlHoJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_808_27643708.1346512908417--