Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:61600) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T8Ddz-0003cD-Un; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:07:35 -0700 Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2sf4391717pbb.16 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:07:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qkm8kykcWw2t0J9HW8bTu+zRScUpsm4ydbV2fYgpgJc=; b=suJXWadVlYDR+ppHACDksjPEv9Cc+fTzI2jEJKHOUgBKySdBqZlUgaVGnHCqWj2kp/ AAiYH8WRw7N54b3h8Id9LMZoD0JCYsCXpk87vt30KMV7s0gBIK01oP+9g7oUGezvAqyQ tFaI9t4ekzW4hSZY8t3gdMqyp5pnCdrYryxVqqOr0mExZ9yFsb4RY15N1xPWUEaiIpBP lT3QcQKIvze5rW4SdH71dZ+7UVMja7H15VZbIhS/kl+NjnIb0BbYFhGh0Af1xcldFfAq gBNUu2LeiuIUI3vNPO1qu371WapdbPCRB0Uh2jcinOj7IfEP4KS0us3tOk6AF3PrxWx3 bDYQ== Received: by 10.68.129.69 with SMTP id nu5mr2725456pbb.17.1346605645689; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:07:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.136.233 with SMTP id qd9ls6320193pbb.4.gmail; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.225.234 with SMTP id rn10mr2738212pbc.3.1346605645008; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 10:07:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "la .lindar." To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4616037b-64b1-4b72-a97a-c28c14e837ba@googlegroups.com> References: <8d3fb774-f4ff-4b86-afa2-df153de2f633@googlegroups.com> <10cd53d6-5aa9-40be-a1f9-2f5ad3115159@googlegroups.com> <1f920c6f-c5f2-49a9-a0cb-dd9779a70271@googlegroups.com> <98e7bb37-f01b-44ea-8a96-82ffc663485e@googlegroups.com> <1346521443.10638.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4616037b-64b1-4b72-a97a-c28c14e837ba@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any real diffrence between hope (.a'o) and desire (.au)? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: lindarthebard@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lindarthebard@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lindarthebard@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_107_31840601.1346605644140" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_107_31840601.1346605644140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Who will discuss semantics primes if not us? Any forum you are aware of? > I'm afraid they are discussed nowhere. > Guaspi? Any other conlang group? University level linguistics courses? Gismu aren't primes, the set of UI aren't meant to be primes, and nothing in the language is meant to be the most basic set of anything. We *really* need to hammer that into everybody and start adopting a policy of using what's there instead of reinventing the wheel. Look, and I mean seriously and earnestly look, for a solution using what is already available to you. If it isn't a problem, don't fix it, and if you absolutely are completely unable to do it with the current grammar, we'll talk then. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/FFNO8To9DIUJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_107_31840601.1346605644140 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Who will discuss semantic= s primes if not us? Any forum you are aware of? I'm afraid they are discuss= ed nowhere.

Guaspi? Any other conlang= group? University level linguistics courses? Gismu aren't primes, the= set of UI aren't meant to be primes, and nothing in the language is meant = to be the most basic set of anything. We *really* need to hammer that = into everybody and start adopting a policy of using what's there instead of= reinventing the wheel. Look, and I mean seriously and earnestly look, for = a solution using what is already available to you. If it isn't a problem, d= on't fix it, and if you absolutely are completely unable to do it with the = current grammar, we'll talk then. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/FF= NO8To9DIUJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_107_31840601.1346605644140--