Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:56070) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T8DnW-0003h6-Tv; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:17:31 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf4331214vbz.16 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=fRjPdsDZ3u0BvzzRR+OGHlx9rsROyd2GIY42LNk2YDY=; b=G7EhHdo89LBl4S/SjY1Zeq+2aw4PdGmwlM5k6PfhpemCsvhIGiPx02RWOwFBxh6Tki jynVnN3DSkRoc2o839LZ48rjTOs46MbbkyukEbl5aGL7UZtkZGFHZQ8raqQYQLc1Znm2 abNzERZtafQnHZfJjnOXy+qitbv4DTnAqiG1MFJdl/+LOj5t/RecKF5zEZjlbJL3FeCJ 6ON65B2OyaTATggoApLoWqzbhuQCNNfQ0dZ4Eg340UdIqtXT0S3ruYWN/N/uNOkokfol qM/hnZmyOQVH/YxBy57q6Ta9RWALjNBWqcmhk4VnUc4ccwUpJaq0esJeDiwktVbNBTJT iYuA== Received: by 10.236.175.1 with SMTP id y1mr149589yhl.9.1346606235924; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.113.178 with SMTP id a38ls6789429yhh.9.gmail; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.180.41 with SMTP id i29mr1145689yhm.4.1346606235366; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 10:17:14 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <0de6e115-4c72-438c-aa36-a40185868734@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <8d3fb774-f4ff-4b86-afa2-df153de2f633@googlegroups.com> <10cd53d6-5aa9-40be-a1f9-2f5ad3115159@googlegroups.com> <1f920c6f-c5f2-49a9-a0cb-dd9779a70271@googlegroups.com> <98e7bb37-f01b-44ea-8a96-82ffc663485e@googlegroups.com> <1346521443.10638.YahooMailNeo@web184403.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <4616037b-64b1-4b72-a97a-c28c14e837ba@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Is there any real diffrence between hope (.a'o) and desire (.au)? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1060_26929523.1346606234717" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_1060_26929523.1346606234717 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sunday, September 2, 2012 9:07:24 PM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote: > > Who will discuss semantics primes if not us? Any forum you are aware of? >> I'm afraid they are discussed nowhere. >> > > Guaspi? Any other conlang group? University level linguistics > courses? Gismu aren't primes, the set of UI aren't meant to be primes, and > nothing in the language is meant to be the most basic set of anything. We > *really* need to hammer that into everybody and start adopting a policy of > using what's there instead of reinventing the wheel. Look, and I mean > seriously and earnestly look, for a solution using what is already > available to you. If it isn't a problem, don't fix it, and if you > absolutely are completely unable to do it with the current grammar, we'll > talk then. > What is more, in this case I have a clear feeling that {.a'o} *is* a prime. But probably it's only my philosophy. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Dvt-s2VLSagJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_1060_26929523.1346606234717 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sunday, September 2, 2012 9:07:24 PM UTC+4, la .lindar. wrote:
Who will discuss semantics primes if not us? Any forum you are= aware of? I'm afraid they are discussed nowhere.
Guaspi? Any other conlang group? University level linguistics = courses? Gismu aren't primes, the set of UI aren't meant to be primes,= and nothing in the language is meant to be the most basic set of anything.=  We *really* need to hammer that into everybody and start adopting a p= olicy of using what's there instead of reinventing the wheel. Look, and I m= ean seriously and earnestly look, for a solution using what is already avai= lable to you. If it isn't a problem, don't fix it, and if you absolutely ar= e completely unable to do it with the current grammar, we'll talk then.&nbs= p;

What is more, in this case I have = a clear feeling that {.a'o}  *is* a prime. But probably it's only my p= hilosophy.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/Dv= t-s2VLSagJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_1060_26929523.1346606234717--