Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:44490)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCIfp7ILVEBCy86SCBRoE4W055A@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1T9m2M-0006eT-6D; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:03:15 -0700
Received: by vcbfl13 with SMTP id fl13sf1881845vcb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from
         :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=TxNp4hd6hiQCHpqNIsY+lnYf7C5HO3UrDZ4OVmqj1ew=;
        b=NT8kP1YpCiFy/eH4ICyrlNfEz4FNqroHz1yB98OHICr9zzUdEHlsNwKDOueRMkFVva
         AN4Iej+aNzgT21VMmcS+aEwqvC/FuCtaa6WYzSs+UctBX+SPQZxWrDpaQgiD6G8IQQb9
         5WJ1Rwmu0rwLUQx07rgovKmfKl/Zcw3+lEt4SbjvnuTWpd0LArazI3X05leeaooIVPmp
         zUCp/zOaD8qSzAFkgpQIP6dXghQF0iyzv0xOXlEQ/laWmysWun3N0xmJXc4/UftZdzsa
         qYsnQZ8SrBRBxZgdsKstxVd7rspgdC1oPSVlOuUbnevMrRtUqrgnBd6BfpbOon424x8S
         h0Hg==
Received: by 10.68.190.65 with SMTP id go1mr1030182pbc.6.1346976179046;
        Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.141.133 with SMTP id ro5ls391410pbb.1.gmail; Thu, 06 Sep
 2012 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.85.135 with SMTP id h7mr759924paz.41.1346976178601;
        Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.85.135 with SMTP id h7mr759923paz.41.1346976178591;
        Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com (mail-pb0-f46.google.com [209.85.160.46])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id vw9si1653240pbc.2.2012.09.06.17.02.58
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.46;
Received: by pbbrr13 with SMTP id rr13so3228121pbb.19
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.218.72 with SMTP id pe8mr7375476pbc.33.1346976178371; Thu,
 06 Sep 2012 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.240.40 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 21:02:58 -0300
Message-ID: <CALMa68r69+MCKtBvNbjoB3-d932JhPJ1RAa1BKX8WyiyoVR=jg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] Definition of simxu (was: Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: Where
 should I use sets and where should I use masses?)
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Felipe_Gon=E7alves_Assis?= <felipeg.assis@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: felipeg.assis@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of felipeg.assis@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.46 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=felipeg.assis@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

I guess a separate thread in the main group is more appropriate for discussing
the definition of {simxu}. I think it is valid and desirable to
collect different possibilities
and examine their pragmatic usefulness and limitations.

The ideas collected here should be eventually posted on the wiki.

On 6 September 2012 20:02, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lojbanists like to give away their interpretation as if it were the law
> without acknowledging that there be any other interpretation. However, it is
> definitely simpler to do so than to explain the various different
> interpretations and their differences, although doing so would be more
> "right" in my opinion.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.