Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:62582)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncCIjkxO_OChCsxaeCBRoEpqbDcQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1T9xI3-00043X-R8; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:04:19 -0700
Received: by yenq11 with SMTP id q11sf2257690yen.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=MBa96zBvSD5i6+Mc8LrkkRdvQOFDN+PTjqhTv+sNX1U=;
        b=pYeyLGh/OQ8zIYv5ldgKAOygBYUF5vI9oZ1gqJEJYFEOpaQKDNKhYKqsqCdClUVFsl
         SbFKSqbfCyl8Dt+CK2ymjTWl6xh1emSzhx1vmeAxvOK7pBxsmm2GSe0OMfYLs9aesexG
         hGGis/sBNxW44yb9z7rvv8yeCnfo50vGk0J2sjpQnp6VjGIdiPRrV0v3rmU6yT9Ubc3f
         NTcot3klhT1dBMJi4y1feWQIKZWXQPmISdpz9dO8EGT3V9OBblakFCUB2YTPvLVcsMBQ
         /LM66ozp4e3dwDDbRQZoxqyaYcps/UgJTQqsGZOy2HdBE42sEV9+9IxX4oKdWEFNR5Ky
         q15Q==
Received: by 10.52.90.129 with SMTP id bw1mr897679vdb.13.1347019437168;
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.177.106 with SMTP id cp10ls371730vdc.2.gmail; Fri, 07 Sep
 2012 05:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.127.226 with SMTP id nj2mr2014060veb.3.1347019436679;
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.127.226 with SMTP id nj2mr2014059veb.3.1347019436666;
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f42.google.com (mail-vb0-f42.google.com [209.85.212.42])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s13si1042633vde.2.2012.09.07.05.03.56
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of betsemes@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.42;
Received: by vbbfs19 with SMTP id fs19so2787819vbb.15
        for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 05:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.13.33 with SMTP id e1mr7346488vec.51.1347019436186; Fri, 07
 Sep 2012 05:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.147.37 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 05:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKwHj2qpU+t3sQ9Y-pzxdq9_AqdSKm1s-wsKPh+V-_V-3YqWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ce353860-6e60-4b01-b60e-ccbc0a6b1fde@googlegroups.com>
	<9d5f25f5-3894-4fd9-835d-004dd8fafd02@googlegroups.com>
	<CAOQ8VDUDgmXMwoByPWdqgyixrsmjoSSjmvuSNjy1qTLnhOOz+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMKwHj2qpU+t3sQ9Y-pzxdq9_AqdSKm1s-wsKPh+V-_V-3YqWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 08:03:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHxnAm+nQ4Zpjq4LVCugLOdPVG0sO8UmE=t8LQeej=Cn8HSLnA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Dscript + Lojban ???
From: Betsemes <betsemes@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: betsemes@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of betsemes@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=betsemes@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6 September 2012 18:44, la .lindar. <lindarthebard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We only have words to support hex and lower. You're welcome to do
>>> anything you'd like, but the official writing system shall remain Roman.
>>
>> Strictly speaking, there is no official writing system. Any writing system
>> that can unambiguously refer to each of lojban's sounds is valid, but none
>> is official. The Roman writing system, albeit the most widespread and de
>> facto official script, is not *technically* official.
>>
>> Sorry to pick nits here, but I don't like seeing anyone being mislead,
>> even those who are unlikely to even really learn much lojban.
>
> Um, you happen to be wrong on this one. The Lojban orthography which uses
> the Roman script /is/ the official one, both "technically" and in reality.
> It is not merely the "de facto" one.

As per this: http://mail.lojban.org/lists/lojban-list/msg26595.html,
back on Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:54:33 there was no official
alphabet/orthography and both Robin and Jorge weren't inclined to
approve one. Have this changed? Is there now an officially approved
one?

mu'o mi'e betsemes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.