Received: from mail-oa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.219.61]:38144) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TC0eA-0005Z7-Ej; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:03:32 -0700 Received: by oagn9 with SMTP id n9sf931087oag.16 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:03:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=amBq0k1gIoktIMZyMLIrRsM5jztfKA1aNaR2ZGQXSa0=; b=TsUQIadRg92mp3px3X98XRJgYgG26oWSyKyqdlV6XWUw8T+bswwz0Y6vyFM4ZgJvit hzaBAAEfmYkjwCSH9fJSII5/p1rkhI0/wks9iX6KaIYFBs7r19DpT2GlyNLnUzbqGKSJ FIjuoQ1jYNil426HZQNYrbXK8i03DsvpwTOlZQKJH0QCY0ml3qAKJm+skznfg+C3mubP YWZOaRINaWb9ME+SSKUgc0r4i4x8BT/AJvnqoFaiOclXEH7PzPpbYJ4bRmFebeLm4lPN cfgFQmnCl+5g3QnxvQNvVr9+px70uXL2jiaKdWYAgfLLPKt6CNki/uqUdoARmHur1Jty oxAw== Received: by 10.236.154.194 with SMTP id h42mr40107yhk.8.1347508995989; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:03:15 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.126.33 with SMTP id a21ls4096668yhi.3.gmail; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.170.1 with SMTP id o1mr498249yhl.42.1347508995389; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.170.1 with SMTP id o1mr498248yhl.42.1347508995377; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id r5si2135868ank.0.2012.09.12.21.03.14; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5; Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3242C2A2DD for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:03:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Fwd: Notice of Internet Intellectual Property Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:03:12 -0400 Message-ID: <122504182.f7HHfncF0k@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.2.0-29-generic; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <05FD87D35FB36120D4611E3D62C0E92C@msltzem> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 21:06:12 Jonathan Jones wrote: > This might be spam, but it seems legit. I don't why it was sent to /me/. > Did anyone else get this? I didn't. Could you post the headers? [...] Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.9 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist [URIs: yg-network.org] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.219.61 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 21:06:12 Jonathan Jones wrote: > This might be spam, but it seems legit. I don't why it was sent to /me/. > Did anyone else get this? I didn't. Could you post the headers? gytrademark.com has a one-year registration, which is correlated with being fraudulent. The phone number, except for the prefix, is the same as that in the email. yg-network.org is registered for two years, and the org name, if "yiguan" is what "yg" is an abbreviation of, sounds like it could be an ISP. I don't recognize either as a registrar. But I don't know much about registrars in China, and I'm more familiar with fake banks and fake lawyers registered by Africans than with sites, real or fake, registered by Chinese. Pierre -- loi mintu se ckaji danlu cu jmaji -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.