.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

On 13 September 2012 14:32, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:

On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:07:23 PM UTC+4, stevo wrote:

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:17 AM, la gleki <gleki.i= s...@gmail.com> wrote:

When we say "I see y= ou" we actually mean "I see you standing/present in front of me/{= co'e}/whatever".

I don't understand why you think "I see you&qu= ot; is short for a longer phrase, especially one that is too specific and o= ften simply not true.=A0

I just think the sentence "I want [to eat] an apple" is somewhat = parallel to "I see you [standing]". If in the first one we must u= se {tu'a} then the same should be true for the second sentence.

stevo

So {mi viska do}= is just a handy emulation of natlangs when it should really be expressed a= s {mi viska tu'a do}. But as some lojbanists already do this illegal tr= ick then let's make it official.

Therefore=A0
{mi ganse lo du'u crino} - I= sense something as being green (i.e. I see it).
{mi ganse lo du&= #39;u lo cladu ku crino} -=A0=A0I sense some loud object as green (i.e. I s= ee it)

{mi ganse [tu'a] lo cladu}=A0=A0 - I sense some loud object = [nothing is said how I sense it, it's might be a synonym of the previou= s example].

So there is no conflict between th= e object and the type of sensing it.=A0In first case you use {tu'a} or = just drop it. In the second case you use {lo su'u/nu/du'u/...}

We have no gismu for TASTE ( {vrusi} has no place for = experiencer) and TOUCH-FEEL ({pencu} is now what we need. when i touch {ko&= #39;a} with a screwdriver i touch-feel the screwdriver but touch=A0{ko'= a}=A0).

We would also need=A0to allow=A0in=A0{sumne2}=A0not only the object be= ing smelled but the type of smell and abstraction for the combination of th= e object and it's smell.
=A0

=A0
<= br>
On Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:37:26 AM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrot= e:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:32:54PM -0700, djandus wrote:
> On Friday, November 18, 2011 3:48:51 PM UTC-6, xorxes wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > This is really interesting stuff! =A0Can you make sure i= t
> > > appears on some appropriate BPFK page?
> > >
> > > I completely agree with you about zgana, and I'm inc= lined to
> > > agree with you about ganse; make sure they get notes in = the
> > > gismu setion please.
> > =A0
> > I'm not in much of a wiki-editing mood l= ately, so I'll leave
> > that to somepony else.
> >
> Dude, did this really never get done?

I linked to the thread on the gismu issues page, a few hours ago.

-Robin

--=20
http://singinst.org/= : =A0Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li= 9;u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u= .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo= mamta be do cu sofybakni li'u

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/CM2jEXP7CeUJ.