Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:60461) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TD5yQ-00062D-Ku; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:57 -0700 Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2sf4725609pbb.16 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Ve3gClBZMyAA4A5mVOpLFAIylw9+EbeYPLe9RDVSjUg=; b=EYn/0/AfkFE922dPfN2QSwTiihianrYKlaXFTvOLDO/uNCZ7iQ1vlkzPv6yNoGgtTN IUUKPHpo3M9rlTtCKGavWdWAihm54ynwfaq1AiPEGbFbDs+73HZt/rCR4mH62imTYBOz zMxN6xWQvChfZm4tuxuXunjALR8HPbG9VOyIMcIsy5E2poZnF99F2hhH5WatwdostmKy 7YobKkDal5vv5qhOBpmRZZo74mRiBb/bu7T7QL+CRlugGYSXFJM8WnKpQgodm3k4knao 0Mkok6folxGys67izD5p+kLgcPlJSDykssT5NZLssNIvCSwN/R1JXG+HcpwixF2TirLA Hk4A== Received: by 10.52.37.74 with SMTP id w10mr315599vdj.8.1347767799953; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.92.107 with SMTP id cl11ls493683vdb.4.gmail; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.201 with SMTP id bu9mr761559vdc.5.1347767799406; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.174.201 with SMTP id bu9mr761558vdc.5.1347767799386; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s13si236823vde.2.2012.09.15.20.56.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.169; Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so3894501vcb.0 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.218.133 with SMTP id hq5mr5293030vcb.60.1347767799189; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.4.193 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:56:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50539D97.4020205@gmx.de> References: <20120814151252.GU27726@samsa> <421689dc-2c42-42f1-9cca-0d2ac1a04677@googlegroups.com> <20120816115739.GA29668@samsa> <50538A6F.2020404@gmx.de> <50539D97.4020205@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:56:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: lo selsanga pe la'o dy. Bodo Wartke .dy zi'e po'u la'o dy. Liebeslied .dy From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: mturniansky@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mturniansky@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mturniansky@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cfc770e9125904c9c9a458 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --14dae9cfc770e9125904c9c9a458 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:11 PM, selpa'i wrote: > Am 14.09.2012 22:52, schrieb Michael Turniansky: > > Well, of course, I haven't seen the debate yet (still being more than = 3 >> weeks behind on email) and therefore don't know if you've already addres= sed >> the following question, >> > > It happened long ago, I can't remember when exactly, but it's been almost > a year, but at least half a year. > > > but EVEN IF I accept arguendo your statement that "ua" is a CV (although >> I don't), then you must ALSO assert that "iu" is a CV. >> > > Yes, iu is CV (bearing though that this C is not the same type of C that > is used to create brivla clusters under the current rules. changing this > would in theory be possible however, which would cause things like bioka = to > be CCVCV brivla. not currently the case, however.) > > > So how do you distinguish between "iu isai..." and "i ui sai..." if all >> the person put down (as here) was "iuisai..."? >> > > The problem here is because it is technically accepted to elide denpa bu > when a space is present, people aren't sure when denpa bu is actually > necessary and when it isn't. It also makes people confused about what the > point of the letter is. I encourage to always include all denpa bu that a= re > necessary and to elide all that can be elided if one so wishes. > If you write down "iu isai" then that becomes {iu .i sai}. If you write i= t > down without spaces, which is the more interesting case and more closely > resembles the actual speechstream, then you have to make sure the automat= ic > initial denpa bu that people are using does what you want it to do. > {iuisai} would become {.i ui sai} if you allow denpa bu to be elided. If > not, it would be ungrammatical (because after iu, the next i is not a > lojban word and it fails to parse). > > What are you talking about? The next i IS a lojbanic word, and parses fine (If you are asserting that a sentence may not be simply an attitudinal, that's not true. Or perhaps you are asserting that sai may not stand alone, which is also untrue). And I never suggested he couldn't elide the denpa bu. I explicitly said: .i uisai" or ".i.uisai" I don't use usually use denpa bu except before "i" or in educational settings. > (And let's not forget that plenty of combinations like "iau" are valid i= n >> names and fu'ivla and are different than "i au and ia u" The pauses nee= d >> to be present to distinguish, or there has to be an unambiguous rule of >> decomposition, which I don't believe there can be, but I will wait furth= er >> commenting upon my reading of what youve already written onthe topic. >> > > There is indeed such a rule of decomposition and only because it exists > can I in good conscience preach this. You just need to be aware that the > semi-vowels are not vowels, they are [w] and [j] in IPA respectively. If > you consider speechstreams, then those are distinct from the actual Lojba= n > vowels (V). "iua" is only possible in cmevla and zi'evla. A cmavo can't > have three VVV in a row, so the cmavo clusters always decompose > unambiguously. If I didn't answer all your questions, please feel free to > through more questions or tests at me. Yes, I have no misunderstanding about [w] and [j]. But they are a natural artifact of the pronouncing of two vowels close together. For example, if you (as some do, but I don't) say that the name le jegvo cevni is la'o jegvo iaue jegvo, you can pronounce it as a single vocalic "flow" from one to the other, and they naturally cause a [w] and [j] (and an [a=CA=8A=CC=AF]) to appear (Go ahead, I'll wait (*hums*)) That's all the m= orphologic rule means, and why it's necessary to separate out the vowel pairs that should NOT be pronounced as diphthongs or semivowels+vowel. Nonetheless, I will agree that in speech, it's not necessary to pause between the words, because the pronunciation as a semivowel and not a vowel will naturally cause the break, but in print (which is what we were addressing here, in case you've forgotten), it IS, because otherwise the decomposition is ambiguous. --gejyspa --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. --14dae9cfc770e9125904c9c9a458 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at= 5:11 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 14.09.2012 22:52, schrieb Michael Turniansky:

=C2=A0 Well, of course, I haven't seen the debate yet (still being more= than 3 weeks behind on email) and therefore don't know if you've a= lready addressed the following question,

It happened long ago, I can't remember when exactly, but it's been = almost a year, but at least half a year.


but EVEN IF I accept arguendo your statement that "ua" is a CV (a= lthough I don't), then you must ALSO assert that "iu" is a CV= .

Yes, iu is CV (bearing though that this C is not the same type of C that is= used to create brivla clusters under the current rules. changing this woul= d in theory be possible however, which would cause things like bioka to be = CCVCV brivla. not currently the case, however.)


So how do you distinguish between "iu isai..." and =C2=A0"i = ui sai..." if all the person put down (as here) was "iuisai...&qu= ot;?

The problem here is because it is technically accepted to elide denpa bu wh= en a space is present, people aren't sure when denpa bu is actually nec= essary and when it isn't. It also makes people confused about what the = point of the letter is. I encourage to always include all denpa bu that are= necessary and to elide all that can be elided if one so wishes.=C2=A0

If you write down "iu isai" then that becomes {iu .i sai}. If you= write it down without spaces, which is the more interesting case and more = closely resembles the actual speechstream, then you have to make sure the a= utomatic initial denpa bu that people are using does what you want it to do= . {iuisai} would become {.i ui sai} if you allow denpa bu to be elided. If = not, it would be ungrammatical (because after iu, the next i is not a lojba= n word and it fails to parse).

=C2=A0
=C2=A0 What are you talking ab= out? =C2=A0The next i IS a lojbanic word, and parses fine (If you are asser= ting that a sentence may not be simply an attitudinal, that's not true.= =C2=A0Or perhaps you are asserting that sai may not stand alone, which is = also untrue). =C2=A0And I never suggested he couldn't elide the denpa b= u. =C2=A0I explicitly said:

.i u= isai" or ".i.uisai"
=C2=A0
=C2=A0 I don't use usually use denpa bu except be= fore "i" or in educational settings.


(And let's not forget that plenty of combinations like "iau" = are valid in names and fu'ivla and are different than "i au and ia= u" =C2=A0The pauses need to be present to distinguish, or there has t= o be an unambiguous rule of decomposition, which I don't believe there = can be, but I will wait further commenting upon my reading of what youve al= ready written onthe topic.

There is indeed such a rule of decomposition and only because it exists can= I in good conscience preach this. You just need to be aware that the semi-= vowels are not vowels, they are [w] and [j] in IPA respectively. If you con= sider speechstreams, then those are distinct from the actual Lojban vowels = (V). "iua" is only possible in cmevla and zi'evla. A cmavo ca= n't have three VVV in a row, so the cmavo clusters always decompose una= mbiguously. If I didn't answer all your questions, please feel free to = through more questions or tests at me.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0Yes, I have no misunderstanding about [w] = and [j]. =C2=A0But they are a natural artifact of the pronouncing of two vo= wels close together. =C2=A0For example, if you (as some do, but I don't= ) say that the name le jegvo cevni is la'o jegvo iaue jegvo, you can pr= onounce it as a single vocalic "flow" from one to the other, and = they naturally cause a [w] and [j] (and an=C2=A0[a=CA=8A=CC=AF])=C2=A0to appear (Go ahead, I'll w= ait (*hums*)) =C2=A0That's all the morphologic rule means, and why it&#= 39;s necessary to separate out the vowel pairs that should NOT be pronounce= d as diphthongs or semivowels+vowel. =C2=A0Nonetheless, I will agree that i= n speech, it's not necessary to pause between the words, because the pr= onunciation as a semivowel and not a vowel will naturally cause the break, = but in print (which is what we were addressing here, in case you've for= gotten), it IS, because otherwise the decomposition is ambiguous.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 --gejyspa

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--14dae9cfc770e9125904c9c9a458--