Received: from mail-wg0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]:34607) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TDGld-0002kH-5x; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:28:28 -0700 Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13sf2247303wgb.16 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:28:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pT9TfNB6OWqRFAB07ihfk/LWxRp3iKw+0vRx9//9fhE=; b=uVQFaMbJc4Wfryu1prtLqXFYW39DYhcjeE9Z8k7Fi5j7ij5AMPx6TRLlLS9f539hho aDqqpKeLzJm1nSY70tYZM3gQNhrlSx8KtJbPM77IZJHhh4ylvKhDxbmtG+iyWq6JVP7H KXuKWWfyKk9R5N2tQ7syxLqz7b2O7EfLIMlZKwm6lQwPUhZul/hcjltjVqGWFcgxzheU /zk4k037yJ9eN6EhD0deyXlt5gqbhlfNJjWoF/c3dOTjoOd7hJdhAu9OBuCtiVnqwQnP kzf5XZ7jZ7HUAtmyKKD1PAfPuzERXdfBa0wMCytl4lwEBAnoedrwWcpirUQ3U06LAy40 Q+mg== Received: by 10.205.139.80 with SMTP id iv16mr515548bkc.6.1347809289464; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:28:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.157.26 with SMTP id z26ls5905814bkw.1.gmail; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr971652bkw.1.1347809288583; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.154.76 with SMTP id n12mr971650bkw.1.1347809288569; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.23]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id 23si616115bku.1.2012.09.16.08.28.08; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2012 15:28:08 -0000 Received: from p57A08F5C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.143.92] by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 16 Sep 2012 17:28:08 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/0Q5oeh730w4FcbE7FZYEDxlJQHSDjgrSlpzE2+c ckeHpD4+1a15ys Message-ID: <5055F005.3050304@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 17:28:05 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: lo selsanga pe la'o dy. Bodo Wartke .dy zi'e po'u la'o dy. Liebeslied .dy References: <20120814151252.GU27726@samsa> <421689dc-2c42-42f1-9cca-0d2ac1a04677@googlegroups.com> <20120816115739.GA29668@samsa> <50538A6F.2020404@gmx.de> <50539D97.4020205@gmx.de> <5055C6FB.3070802@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Am 16.09.2012 17:08, schrieb Michael Turniansky: > Ah, so NOW I see where you are coming from. You believe that,=20 > contrary to the CLL, "a word must never begin with a vowel", and that=20 > the denpa bu must always be a glottal stop, not just a pause. Both=20 > are contradicted by Chapter 3 of the CLL, The CLL's view on this topic is not very coherent. The CLL simply=20 overlooks a lot of this and is therefore outdated. > and lojban as it is actually used. As it is used by some. Those that understand the things I'm trying to=20 explain here (and agree with it) have already changed their way of using=20 Lojban to make it make more sense. You are not aware of all Lojban usage=20 out there, so this is an argument out of ignorance. > Since are talking about some theoretical language that you use, and=20 > not lojban, there is no point in continuing this discussion, as we are=20 > talking about two different languages. If by Lojban you mean what the CLL describes, then yes, that is not a=20 language I'm speaking and nor is anybody else I consider a good speaker=20 of Lojban. There is no point in bringing up the CLL in matters that it=20 clearly is either inconsistent about or that it adresses poorly. I'm=20 sure you are aware of at least some changes that have been made to the=20 original Language described in the CLL. Do you object to all of them=20 because the CLL contradicts them, or do you agree with them because they=20 actually make a lot of sense? mu'o mi'e la selpa'i --=20 pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.