Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:60407) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TEOiG-0003GM-6w; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:09:50 -0700 Received: by qcac11 with SMTP id c11sf1154293qca.16 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:09:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=ijoLc5EdK95nhMc9+pgownu26AYc/JWlSBeZ/CLnGvE=; b=dChHul5Tsb8tBk/mM1naQ/7lvcnhfOksQwDv6B4qfny5IDhyQr+XQVDtMo38La6JDK nk/5o5/JV96TGmsK4N1J/EQIvsoJE6qCzjmU4JwIXBalUGeDxKyFPt9+rostvMFC+goA CG6jFl4mSPQa1zpckADBjedMjD/BL8ZjLVdRu9CFc5ebs2jarLIRCi4c5Fa3bGXyOTTj RHeR+iHP5eJHAIB0loZnyYpu/V21PtGeN5doHq2O1nu9U+0uhAsCWyY1jNA+dGNMnyIC 8jp2UcOywc5omdXqttq3fx8Kjpho/eo1+EsKgs3CDX3RzsTSsXrbvam12/9y48k0VHco Pgew== Received: by 10.236.201.134 with SMTP id b6mr760082yho.15.1348078161376; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:09:21 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.120.244 with SMTP id p80ls2304467yhh.0.gmail; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.161.8 with SMTP id v8mr2814956yhk.18.1348078158976; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.161.8 with SMTP id v8mr2814955yhk.18.1348078158957; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id o6si685251yhn.7.2012.09.19.11.09.15; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5; Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9DB178A3 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:09:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] CCL and xorlo Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:09:14 -0400 Message-ID: <2599731.oNFm10VrJH@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.2.0-30-generic; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <7deaac69-374a-4cb2-bff6-b45d8c8c7d31@googlegroups.com> References: <7deaac69-374a-4cb2-bff6-b45d8c8c7d31@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 03:16:47 jsemeria92@gmail.com wrote: > I was just wondering if anyone is working on updating the CCL (or any > learning materials for that matter) to correct for xorlo? >=20 > I remember hearing or reading somewhere (for the life of me I can't recal= l > the source) a few days ago that it was being worked on but I've failed to > find any information about such a thing. I only ask because I want to try > taking a crack at learning lojban again but I'd rather wait until the > online CCL thing is updated with xorlo. I find the thought of learning > lojban while trying to figure out how it really works with xorlo instead. > Leads to me being very confused and frustrated I suppose. So I occasional= ly > click on the lojban website, check to see if the CCL has had xorlo > incorporated and it never is so I end it at that. Rinse and repeat. Xorlo changes only the semantics and usage of articles. The syntax is not= =20 changed at all. Other changes you may want to be aware of are: *Dotside: you put a dot on each side of a cmevla, and you can say "la=20 .xavilat." instead of "la xavilot." (some place mentioned early in Genesis)= =20 and "la .labruk." or "la .belarus." instead of "la blabruk". "la .xavilot."= =20 and "la .blabruk." are still valid. *Phonotactic changes: You have to worry about this only if you're going to= =20 coin fu'ivla (which I do a fair bit). The words "mliau" (to meow), "cionmau= "=20 (panda), "kriofla" (the spice clove), and "tarksako" (dandelion) may or may= not=20 be valid, depending on which rules are chosen. The CLL is not entirely clea= r=20 on this. None of this should keep you from learning Lojban, any more than having a= =20 French book in the previous version of the orthography. You know not to eat= =20 cig=FCe et ognons, even if it's spelled "cigu=EB et oignons". (Cig=FCe is p= oisonous=20 and easily confused with carotte.) Pierre --=20 The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.