Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:39480)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCVIBHG2X4PRB5PG5CBAKGQEXHVV6ZY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TERS8-0004oW-CZ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:05:08 -0700
Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2sf1426013pbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=2jh4adzwabgGl4NKWZwGkG6ghWO3xJ/7c7AUJoL2o+M=;
        b=rBQcZ12DvMinNkS5RStx/hab3qaRr8TM/nSfShrl28yrFI8srS7pOksohBjPHpcqOW
         ZZHW/a+stozNzfxNnPqqrboKMJycDtahN4wq4i9F7MR6ws1eE/ZQd8O7bW3apwnLJZY9
         se0dWrjvXZyFcrIXEw0T82q1yeEFV+UnfKmV5vlhkRVLa+iV/IlCI//wXdhZEbNwCcQ5
         WBahq0BdtxFVNhkd9x8XvPF6G7zyRBmBQuG5Tyu/0msqm/pElr9CV+Q/FyJXX1B+FzV3
         jNurkQPrA4GegLNJYrxi2/JNEy+8qc+vJmbwj9Y7ZhavFwRXCOSwCWsPByrJwCfsR5Ex
         Ggjg==
Received: by 10.182.44.67 with SMTP id c3mr339587obm.1.1348088693786;
        Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.186.99 with SMTP id v63ls2644691yhm.1.gmail; Wed, 19 Sep
 2012 14:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.173.202 with SMTP id v50mr1160122yhl.19.1348088689014;
        Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: jsemeria92@gmail.com
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <0931c47c-ceca-4b2a-8804-37789ffd5409@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <17AD1E3D-C476-4A69-86E3-E1B42D856E90@yahoo.com>
References: <7deaac69-374a-4cb2-bff6-b45d8c8c7d31@googlegroups.com> <20120919161914.GB29682@clanspum.net> <CAHiXx=NnxtvNTnFQBWJBpCUvNGjBvia8Tat3QHRv0u4Pkt=7vQ@mail.gmail.com> <505A1989.8030203@gmx.de> <CAHiXx=PCfHvvrvxGb+B+ozdvrOOb-Z_pbi43gnBxSN0zO_ybgw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOQ8VDVLMG=0XROni6HVmgKPWTytEhViDivoq3CAA+Vc+Ks1eA@mail.gmail.com>
 <17AD1E3D-C476-4A69-86E3-E1B42D856E90@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] CCL and xorlo
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: jsemeria92@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 jsemeria92@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jsemeria92@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_182_13943475.1348088688339"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_182_13943475.1348088688339
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks to everyone for the responses, I suppose I'm just getting in my own 
way when it comes to diving into learning as always.

What parts of the language are being "perfected" since it seems the 
language currently is good enough so that trying to gain more people that 
are interested would only help the language. Rather than focusing years and 
years on trying to "perfect" it which will never happen, no language is 
perfect. Right now I'd prefer seeing a focus on getting newbies to join and 
get interested so that they may help since at this rate with our current 
workforce, it seems it'll take decades before its finally "done". There 
just seems to be too much "work" and not enough people. So again I wonder, 
what parts of the language are needing so much effort? Then again that's 
just my opinion again, I've done no work for the language so its 
speculation on my part. 

Also why reduce the amount of selma'o? With my limited knowledge, I assume 
selma'o are just the names given to the different cmavo groups so, even if 
you did reduce the number of selma'o the amount of cmavo would stay the 
same correct? 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/H4eJO2Pr03IJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_182_13943475.1348088688339
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks to everyone for the responses, I suppose I'm just getting in my own way when it comes to diving into learning as always.<br><br>What
 parts of the language are being "perfected" since it seems the language
 currently is good enough so that trying to gain more people that are 
interested would only help the language. Rather than focusing years and 
years on trying to "perfect" it which will never happen, no language is 
perfect. Right now I'd prefer seeing a focus on getting newbies to join 
and get interested so that they may help since at this rate with our 
current workforce, it seems it'll take decades before its finally 
"done". There just seems to be too much "work" and not enough people. So
 again I wonder, what parts of the language are needing so much effort? 
Then again that's just my opinion again, I've done no work for the 
language so its speculation on my part. <br><br>Also why reduce the 
amount of selma'o? With my limited knowledge, I assume selma'o are just 
the names given to the different cmavo groups so, even if you did reduce
 the number of selma'o the amount of cmavo would stay the same correct? <br>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/H4eJO2Pr03IJ">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/H4eJO2Pr03IJ</a>.<br /> 
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.<br />



------=_Part_182_13943475.1348088688339--