Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:62600) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TFTl3-0008Dl-Bb; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:58 -0700 Received: by qcac11 with SMTP id c11sf3776501qca.16 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=8ZBh8NlOmmtrIZ1946oz3iVJJfKXk96ylYaEZqHgRrA=; b=kf5+c3lXHajLyUI++fPrH3ixzDtqqSG/P4XeSvBVbQLjGx6x9Q7l6Pow57bWEfXcLR Is/85kM5q65JTIUZ3tvXAVytGjCpVIq4h4ka+eFn3LcIPbtw5aONVBefB97pugECLxYB wh8iz6ekBigG1XLriJbpCz3bbyjhfDmsZlN3gTcU9+vPvXDwYBNcoIRcH1IKf1OWCAJf 2UT3469vkGrMfWurqOJcGFGr8tx/YPVXZCXc/wTWDfpgaVXgtyqu2hFfVIkCwtZBygGz qLpTTaaZOd9RDn8isY2SZ6P8WHe2RvL73ntV+NaXE8jZlCvveAqPirSB0IzRCbLOLTWt ADWQ== Received: by 10.52.90.129 with SMTP id bw1mr1416802vdb.13.1348335882598; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.141.4 with SMTP id k4ls3435115vcu.8.gmail; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.187.168 with SMTP id ft8mr1681735vec.7.1348335882191; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.187.168 with SMTP id ft8mr1681734vec.7.1348335882178; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com (mail-vb0-f46.google.com [209.85.212.46]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bn19si363437vdb.0.2012.09.22.10.44.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.46; Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so4899737vbb.19 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.37.194 with SMTP id y2mr4835260vcd.44.1348335881873; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.48 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1804837.0ZoKyyodFy@caracal> References: <1804837.0ZoKyyodFy@caracal> From: Jacob Errington Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:44:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] voi To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54eea8e46e7d404ca4de901 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec54eea8e46e7d404ca4de901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If it's being used to restrict a referent set based on a subjective/uncertain claim, then it's certainly alright. However, voi can probably be substituted with {poi pe'i} or {poi ju'oru'e}. Still, it's shorter. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o On 22 September 2012 07:54, Pierre Abbat wrote: > Is this an appropriate use of voi?: "ta voi citka lo bambusa cu cionmau", > pointing at a baby panda. Baby pandas don't eat bamboo; they drink milk > like > any other mammal. > > Pierre > -- > ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec54eea8e46e7d404ca4de901 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 If it's being used to restrict a referent set based on a subjective/uncertain claim, then it's certainly alright.
However, voi can probably be substituted with {poi pe'i} or {poi ju'oru'e}. Still, it's shorter.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

On 22 September 2012 07:54, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
Is this an appropriate use of voi?: "ta voi citka lo bambusa cu cionmau",
pointing at a baby panda. Baby pandas don't eat bamboo; they drink milk like
any other mammal.

Pierre
--
ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
--bcaec54eea8e46e7d404ca4de901--