Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:43475) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TFhck-000452-9R; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:33:22 -0700 Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17sf4162499vcb.16 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:33:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=qD6Cxf9Llk1SzRreNbnFbrFGaPed2VRxZGrWCnGb7nU=; b=Ls/jSoqnv69L7jP0SKxZne5cef+h2ijhnbL2iUDdmrwvhvCFsyEsGgdqpz2PbdoaXn gJe6VBl3ZBeq54JwjqiGQQR68jdQ3RhEgsj8v5BuXN5TwqiOrs2vu7Ub8aw/phKZaaI3 TWyPYA13xmRH+rokhUnSRH5EAjcENwDjTa38SyUSkQJHfl9lKnMZcAAPHxlnuB459kns B8G9EGdimiok9rriaTehdL1uOuPjpbsTlXNaew3+3JT8WH/UP1nUw8bmtvgB9LtQ9LZw +/Y824GCglvIirMarIIP33FozKI0QURwHmNgflS0wWDsrTrzzmJ5Iyk5WGKlcw+Bi8uM cGVg== Received: by 10.52.30.133 with SMTP id s5mr1535378vdh.10.1348389183342; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:33:03 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.223.69 with SMTP id ij5ls3619987vcb.6.gmail; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.90.129 with SMTP id bw1mr1517855vdb.13.1348389183047; Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:33:02 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <1804837.0ZoKyyodFy@caracal> Subject: Re: [lojban] voi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_955_33529234.1348389182765" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_955_33529234.1348389182765 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:44:42 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote: > > If it's being used to restrict a referent set based on a > subjective/uncertain claim, then it's certainly alright. > However, voi can probably be substituted with {poi pe'i} or {poi > ju'oru'e}. Still, it's shorter. > Bring him to the* la selpa'i* 's side doi la tsani ;) > > .i mi'e la tsani mu'o > > On 22 September 2012 07:54, Pierre Abbat > > wrote: > >> Is this an appropriate use of voi?: "ta voi citka lo bambusa cu cionmau", >> pointing at a baby panda. Baby pandas don't eat bamboo; they drink milk >> like >> any other mammal. >> >> Pierre >> -- >> ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+un...@googlegroups.com . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/6WDxF8bqMqsJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_955_33529234.1348389182765 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:44:42 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:If it's being used to restrict a re= ferent set based on a subjective/uncertain claim, then it's certainly alrig= ht.
However, voi can probably be substituted with {poi pe'i} or {poi ju= 'oru'e}. Still, it's shorter.

Bring h= im to the la selpa'i 's side doi la tsani ;)

 

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

On 22 September 2012 07:54, Pierre Abbat <ph...= @phma.optus.nu> wrote:
Is this an appropriate use of voi?: "ta voi = citka lo bambusa cu cionmau",
pointing at a baby panda. Baby pandas don't eat bamboo; they drink milk lik= e
any other mammal.

Pierre
--
ve ka'a ro klaji la .romas. se jmaji

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googl= egroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/= lojban?hl=3Den.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/6W= DxF8bqMqsJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_955_33529234.1348389182765--