Received: from mail-vb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]:44371) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TGAx6-0006Qz-Ii; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:52:16 -0700 Received: by vbzb23 with SMTP id b23sf5416821vbz.16 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:52:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=gQxTOR88qKzIezEb2hW3koB+VaVQ8Zcf/OXwwWzF3fI=; b=dTs/iZSBZ29clFr8ypx1NHU8UgWXkpFH/JngZnz8vV48la0kw6yCbnt43laeFJlLFk GUtpPGYS+r1jooHelSxW/BBsOnhZS2f5eKtTX3hrU0Sy4tupRx4EuWD72visucFXRCie B1CpxlcCJmo1TZJ4tGUkJualalHABIWhbuPkMbGjDI2p4uRLxM/pj0oEkyMBTx/qXVcl bp7mextQGiBAoaO07EYcJmdzpnWrsLigPeNkJdVeTn4lHlAACkH/sNXUV7eWqOm/FM+7 Mzy9EQAarxcjHUfB2WRufeIkN/u0PS1Ia/HweZY6FrP7mQPQfxZcGOQpEGJj6VtRYJ18 MFsw== Received: by 10.224.110.204 with SMTP id o12mr3302707qap.6.1348501921262; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:52:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.216.6 with SMTP id hg6ls11608773qab.5.gmail; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.220.12 with SMTP id hw12mr10492152qab.8.1348501920700; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 08:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.28.72 with SMTP id l8msqac; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.192.164 with SMTP id i24mr897558yhn.14.1348266300288; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:24:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Lyons To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <87245fc0-db68-443a-80b5-b586e32a2ca6@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: References: <2B971FEE-7247-41D6-BB51-0F81040A67F1@storytotell.org> Subject: Re: [lojban] ridiculous propaganda posters MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: fusion@storytotell.org Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10_9264377.1348266299307" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_10_9264377.1348266299307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Friday, September 21, 2012 3:23:21 PM UTC-6, tsani wrote: > > {.i .u'u doi la daiv .i .e'anai ku'i mi na curmi le nu do go'i} > For this purpose you should use {lo} (using {le} here offers no benifits > really. There're almost no practical cases where {le nu} is ever needed.) > {.e'a} (and by extension {.e'anai}) is what we call an "irrealis > attitudinal". What that means is that it basically describes a non-real > world. {.e'anai do go'i} by *itself* means "I'm not letting you do that," > whereas {.e'anai mi na curmi lo nu do go'i} means "I'm not allowing it to > not be the case that I allow you to do that," which sounds approximately as > semantically wrong in English as it does in Lojban :p. > Thanks for explaining all this. I was the least certain of this one in particular (and "ko xabju" but I didn't see a closer word for "abide", but I think the ambiguity is part of the fun of that movie). I take it either of these alternatives would be closer then: - .u'u doi la .dev. .ie'anai go'i - .u'u doi la .dev. .i ku'i mi na curmi lo nu do go'i Is that true? Otherwise the pictures are pretty good. The "style" is a bit weird, but > that's simply due to being new. > Hopefully that will improve as I read more. > .i'osai ui .i lo cnino cu se jmina vau .a'o > Thanks! :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/GDTg8Y64beQJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. ------=_Part_10_9264377.1348266299307 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday, September 21, 2012 3:23:21 PM UTC-6, tsani wrote:
{.i .u'u doi la daiv .i .e'anai ku'i mi na cu= rmi le nu do go'i}
For this purpose you should use {lo} (using {le} her= e offers no benifits really. There're almost no practical cases where {le n= u} is ever needed.)
{.e'a} (and by extension {.e'anai}) is what we call an "irrealis attit= udinal". What that means is that it basically describes a non-real world. {= .e'anai do go'i} by *itself* means "I'm not letting you do that," whereas {= .e'anai mi na curmi lo nu do go'i} means "I'm not allowing it to not be the= case that I allow you to do that," which sounds approximately as semantica= lly wrong in English as it does in Lojban :p.

Th= anks for explaining all this. I was the least certain of this one in partic= ular (and "ko xabju" but I didn't see a closer word for "abide", but I thin= k the ambiguity is part of the fun of that movie).

I take it either = of these alternatives would be closer then:

 - .u'u doi la .dev= . .ie'anai go'i
 - .u'u doi la .dev. .i ku'i mi na curmi lo nu do g= o'i

Is that true?

Otherwise the pictures are pretty good. The "style" is a bit weird, bu= t that's simply due to being new.

Hopefully that= will improve as I read more.
 
.i'osai ui .i lo cnino cu se jmina vau .a'= o

Thanks! :)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/GD= Tg8Y64beQJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_10_9264377.1348266299307--