Received: from mail-ie0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:44207) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TGLS2-0002IS-KW; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:59 -0700 Received: by iebc10 with SMTP id c10sf2558036ieb.16 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=bAsgWy16zgN8cB23GvN9iqfg00w8nV/l/0BqaBiI8v0=; b=JZ9dF5uF9d4u0Qc9rkieifmvua28RhZX2NnFv8pr8N2VJzQY+ZScRZVn72kaKW+KXu WPdB/ve8+rhP+aNQbtKP5fqlCJLZMo0YmKABjyzyFeyUz2e6hDrOL4KjB4yfSrc5Cs22 Xj5TP15w1JRLGckLgq+Hse/xuK0avACshJKPIndmDo3tm65hAvvx4zK8Q6cy0efVMRmO fJA39xWb9xjZR8spn7G2axTv46CrInOC9+kosUz6IZBJ5TQ/5JiuFwDIQB2fPp65ovAZ Fqk5tLTBuUYutrM2RdE2qhI5E12uVpeXfmCvuJzV89kvCGtSwa/IqE/FdJUGxu5gQmmc c12w== Received: by 10.52.75.36 with SMTP id z4mr2178483vdv.14.1348542279939; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.20.7 with SMTP id j7ls2276561vde.0.gmail; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.145.227 with SMTP id sx3mr3892968veb.31.1348542279446; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.145.227 with SMTP id sx3mr3892967veb.31.1348542279429; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f169.google.com (mail-vc0-f169.google.com [209.85.220.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r14si992734vdu.1.2012.09.24.20.04.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.169; Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so6825728vcb.28 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.108.79 with SMTP id e15mr8415660vcp.26.1348542279163; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.48 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87245fc0-db68-443a-80b5-b586e32a2ca6@googlegroups.com> References: <2B971FEE-7247-41D6-BB51-0F81040A67F1@storytotell.org> <87245fc0-db68-443a-80b5-b586e32a2ca6@googlegroups.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:04:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] ridiculous propaganda posters To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043892a7839e3f04ca7df7f6 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d043892a7839e3f04ca7df7f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 21 September 2012 15:24, Daniel Lyons wrote: > On Friday, September 21, 2012 3:23:21 PM UTC-6, tsani wrote: >> >> {.i .u'u doi la daiv .i .e'anai ku'i mi na curmi le nu do go'i} >> For this purpose you should use {lo} (using {le} here offers no benifits >> really. There're almost no practical cases where {le nu} is ever needed.) >> {.e'a} (and by extension {.e'anai}) is what we call an "irrealis >> attitudinal". What that means is that it basically describes a non-real >> world. {.e'anai do go'i} by *itself* means "I'm not letting you do that," >> whereas {.e'anai mi na curmi lo nu do go'i} means "I'm not allowing it to >> not be the case that I allow you to do that," which sounds approximately as >> semantically wrong in English as it does in Lojban :p. >> > > Thanks for explaining all this. I was the least certain of this one in > particular (and "ko xabju" but I didn't see a closer word for "abide", but > I think the ambiguity is part of the fun of that movie). > > I take it either of these alternatives would be closer then: > > - .u'u doi la .dev. .ie'anai go'i > - .u'u doi la .dev. .i ku'i mi na curmi lo nu do go'i > > Is that true? > Yes, those are much better :) However, although I think it was unintentional, {.ie'anai} is meant to be {.i .e'anai}, yes? Otherwise, {.ie'anai} is not valid. Also, there is an important distinction to make between the various types of negation that exist. What you use in the second alternative is called contradictory negation; it makes to claim, simply denying a claim. A better alternative would be to use polar opposite negation, in the form of {.i ku'i mi to'e curmi lo nu do go'i}. We can form a lujvo to shorten this to {.i mi tolcru lo nu do go'i}. Finally, {go'i} only really works if there is a preceding sentence to which {go'i} can refer. If Dave doesn't say anything, then that {go'i} is weird. Using {co'e} would be better in this context, I think. > > Otherwise the pictures are pretty good. The "style" is a bit weird, but >> that's simply due to being new. >> > > Hopefully that will improve as I read more. > And spend time on IRC, I hope! :) > > >> .i'osai ui .i lo cnino cu se jmina vau .a'o >> > > Thanks! :) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/GDTg8Y64beQJ. > > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d043892a7839e3f04ca7df7f6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21 September 2012 15:24, Daniel Lyons <fusion@storytotell.org&= gt; wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012 3:23:21 PM UTC-6, tsani wro= te:
{.i .u'u doi la daiv .i .e&#= 39;anai ku'i mi na curmi le nu do go'i}
For this purpose you should use {lo} (using {le} here offers no benifits re= ally. There're almost no practical cases where {le nu} is ever needed.)=
{.e'a} (and by extension {.e'anai}) is what we call an "i= rrealis attitudinal". What that means is that it basically describes a= non-real world. {.e'anai do go'i} by *itself* means "I'm = not letting you do that," whereas {.e'anai mi na curmi lo nu do go= 'i} means "I'm not allowing it to not be the case that I allow= you to do that," which sounds approximately as semantically wrong in = English as it does in Lojban :p.

Thanks for explaining all this. I was the least= certain of this one in particular (and "ko xabju" but I didn'= ;t see a closer word for "abide", but I think the ambiguity is pa= rt of the fun of that movie).

I take it either of these alternatives would be closer then:

=A0= - .u'u doi la .dev. .ie'anai go'i
=A0- .u'u doi la .dev.= .i ku'i mi na curmi lo nu do go'i

Is that true?

Yes, those are much better :)
However, althou= gh I think it was unintentional, {.ie'anai} is meant to be {.i .e'a= nai}, yes? Otherwise, {.ie'anai} is not valid.
Also, there is= an important distinction to make between the various types of negation tha= t exist. What you use in the second alternative is called contradictory neg= ation; it makes to claim, simply denying a claim. A better alternative woul= d be to use polar opposite negation, in the form of {.i ku'i mi to'= e curmi lo nu do go'i}. We can form a lujvo to shorten this to {.i mi t= olcru lo nu do go'i}.
Finally, {go'i} only really works if there is a preceding sentence= to which {go'i} can refer. If Dave doesn't say anything, then that= {go'i} is weird. Using {co'e} would be better in this context, I t= hink.
=A0

Otherwise the pictures are pretty good. The "style" is a bit= weird, but that's simply due to being new.

Hopefully that will improve as I read more.

And spend time on IRC, I hope! :)
=A0
=A0
.i'osai ui .i lo cnino cu se jmina vau .a'o
=

Thanks! :)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/GDTg8Y64beQJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d043892a7839e3f04ca7df7f6--