Received: from mail-vc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.220.189]:55485) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TGTJP-00054J-6y; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:32 -0700 Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17sf6173955vcb.16 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=j08ZR/CqQddnUas4xxvVM5k5gukFrAxiFbEpGjOxCJg=; b=MiG+GGWg/3c0uUam/vIMUh5AdwTnedwk+/8Jc7CPOjXL9LBIOEn+x93PP1rI/0+prL bBAidtUzOZyo9+vh9Dt27pb0XJZFLJL5FAV6fAssePvTk3SH0xMDykhD87UxSNoyvCuG 4qSGaNGmiu065kIHo3fuvGMzpLnZk41eu4URIOPJqyH3taQmd0qxsTV8wOIHqLFZAdUB I1AaEnAFUjDEPGU4L8EZJfCjK+368JvoX43K8h07+L6dL2yGLcZqVx3w4KdAk97uDgCZ FKEjSOILeQX5kgHScYscjPU7AUM6Kt/+MV9TRmF50OFZ6PGxN7Vy0E27FS4LFdPfb4f4 2+KQ== Received: by 10.50.197.165 with SMTP id iv5mr3955462igc.4.1348572496055; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:16 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.51.234 with SMTP id n10ls4811624igo.3.canary; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.76.194 with SMTP id m2mr4302424igw.2.1348572495524; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.76.194 with SMTP id m2mr4302423igw.2.1348572495495; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id us14si6321igb.3.2012.09.25.04.28.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.53; Received: by oagj6 with SMTP id j6so3027080oag.26 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.25.193 with SMTP id e1mr11976338oeg.87.1348572495120; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:28:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.76.132.2 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 04:27:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2B971FEE-7247-41D6-BB51-0F81040A67F1@storytotell.org> <87245fc0-db68-443a-80b5-b586e32a2ca6@googlegroups.com> From: ".arpis." Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 07:27:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] ridiculous propaganda posters To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1f84c86886504ca8500ae X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --e89a8fb1f84c86886504ca8500ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think that using {go'i} in an out of context quotation is fine: mu'a {.i la .alis. pu cusku lu na go'i li'u} makes sense; it's actually what Alice said, and the listener treats the {go'i} as a {co'e}, but recognizes that in context it was more specific. Dave did say something immediately prior in the movie. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > On 21 September 2012 15:24, Daniel Lyons wrote: > >> On Friday, September 21, 2012 3:23:21 PM UTC-6, tsani wrote: >>> >>> {.i .u'u doi la daiv .i .e'anai ku'i mi na curmi le nu do go'i} >>> For this purpose you should use {lo} (using {le} here offers no benifits >>> really. There're almost no practical cases where {le nu} is ever needed.) >>> {.e'a} (and by extension {.e'anai}) is what we call an "irrealis >>> attitudinal". What that means is that it basically describes a non-real >>> world. {.e'anai do go'i} by *itself* means "I'm not letting you do that," >>> whereas {.e'anai mi na curmi lo nu do go'i} means "I'm not allowing it to >>> not be the case that I allow you to do that," which sounds approximately as >>> semantically wrong in English as it does in Lojban :p. >>> >> >> Thanks for explaining all this. I was the least certain of this one in >> particular (and "ko xabju" but I didn't see a closer word for "abide", but >> I think the ambiguity is part of the fun of that movie). >> >> I take it either of these alternatives would be closer then: >> >> - .u'u doi la .dev. .ie'anai go'i >> - .u'u doi la .dev. .i ku'i mi na curmi lo nu do go'i >> >> Is that true? >> > > Yes, those are much better :) > However, although I think it was unintentional, {.ie'anai} is meant to be > {.i .e'anai}, yes? Otherwise, {.ie'anai} is not valid. > Also, there is an important distinction to make between the various types > of negation that exist. What you use in the second alternative is called > contradictory negation; it makes to claim, simply denying a claim. A better > alternative would be to use polar opposite negation, in the form of {.i > ku'i mi to'e curmi lo nu do go'i}. We can form a lujvo to shorten this to > {.i mi tolcru lo nu do go'i}. > Finally, {go'i} only really works if there is a preceding sentence to > which {go'i} can refer. If Dave doesn't say anything, then that {go'i} is > weird. Using {co'e} would be better in this context, I think. > > >> >> Otherwise the pictures are pretty good. The "style" is a bit weird, but >>> that's simply due to being new. >>> >> >> Hopefully that will improve as I read more. >> > > And spend time on IRC, I hope! :) > > >> >> >>> .i'osai ui .i lo cnino cu se jmina vau .a'o >>> >> >> Thanks! :) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "lojban" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/GDTg8Y64beQJ. >> >> To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- mu'o mi'e .arpis. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --e89a8fb1f84c86886504ca8500ae Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think that using {go'i} in an out of context quotation is fine: mu= 9;a

{.i la .alis. pu cusku lu na go'i li'u}

makes sen= se; it's actually what Alice said, and the listener treats the {go'= i} as a {co'e}, but recognizes that in context it was more specific.
Dave did say something immediately prior in the movie.

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Jacob Errington <nict= ytan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 21 September 2012 15:24= , Daniel Lyons <fusion@storytotell.org> wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012 3:23:21 PM UTC-6, tsani wrote:{.i .u'u doi la daiv .i .e'anai ku= 9;i mi na curmi le nu do go'i}
For this purpose you should use {lo} (using {le} here offers no benifits re= ally. There're almost no practical cases where {le nu} is ever needed.)=
{.e'a} (and by extension {.e'anai}) is what we call an "i= rrealis attitudinal". What that means is that it basically describes a= non-real world. {.e'anai do go'i} by *itself* means "I'm = not letting you do that," whereas {.e'anai mi na curmi lo nu do go= 'i} means "I'm not allowing it to not be the case that I allow= you to do that," which sounds approximately as semantically wrong in = English as it does in Lojban :p.

Thanks for explaining all this. I was the least= certain of this one in particular (and "ko xabju" but I didn'= ;t see a closer word for "abide", but I think the ambiguity is pa= rt of the fun of that movie).

I take it either of these alternatives would be closer then:

=A0= - .u'u doi la .dev. .ie'anai go'i
=A0- .u'u doi la .dev.= .i ku'i mi na curmi lo nu do go'i

Is that true?

Yes, those are much better :)
However, = although I think it was unintentional, {.ie'anai} is meant to be {.i .e= 'anai}, yes? Otherwise, {.ie'anai} is not valid.
Also, th= ere is an important distinction to make between the various types of negati= on that exist. What you use in the second alternative is called contradicto= ry negation; it makes to claim, simply denying a claim. A better alternativ= e would be to use polar opposite negation, in the form of {.i ku'i mi t= o'e curmi lo nu do go'i}. We can form a lujvo to shorten this to {.= i mi tolcru lo nu do go'i}.
Finally, {go'i} only really works if there is a preceding sentence= to which {go'i} can refer. If Dave doesn't say anything, then that= {go'i} is weird. Using {co'e} would be better in this context, I t= hink.
=A0

Otherwise the pictures are pretty good. The "style" is a bit= weird, but that's simply due to being new.

Hopefully that will improve as I read more.

And spend time on IRC, I hope! :)
=A0
=A0
.i'osai ui .i lo cnino cu se jmina vau .a'o
=

Thanks! :)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/GDTg8Y64beQJ.

=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .arpis.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--e89a8fb1f84c86886504ca8500ae--