Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:43708)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBDKM7JENRINRBWMFSKBQKGQEDYNZ3UQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1THHEG-0001IB-ES; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:46:28 -0700
Received: by pbbrp8 with SMTP id rp8sf2715732pbb.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=f8PFwf3ngDDeu4FdJ0D1D6qW7QbqKxVVdSE3cOm6o5g=;
        b=EUiTmgJsQHe4FcLOuUoRVgDfghUeqP2wPlxvmX9BgM9AuVQQdW9cgi/y2200G7M81n
         LJFvRdL88TCryMv7opERJiHPackeI48k8wy6YwG6CmXbATTQdy8OfmkGxpfSGH/B50Lt
         TvopdK1UwSTB0kGyZu3Ai9LT/ePM9ojGvPdpRhsDAV7A3JLtUgGKl5e3jncH+MqNigiC
         /hFw9saap/x064H7EwTYXYzau0Frk280xnuo1dAStwoX8R1eakLcLujH2ltp0TUncrJH
         h8OaiYSo/ag9pQCwWmLLbAgbv7BSzXe6gpg/FG6YtQG5mxS5mjhZWjGoyTbigGcZRhCM
         QABw==
Received: by 10.236.150.16 with SMTP id y16mr958340yhj.8.1348764377947;
        Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.236.133.84 with SMTP id p60ls5464455yhi.5.gmail; Thu, 27 Sep
 2012 09:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.115.6 with SMTP id d6mr3677296yhh.40.1348764377475;
        Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.115.6 with SMTP id d6mr3677295yhh.40.1348764377463;
        Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id o6si1410904yhn.7.2012.09.27.09.46.16;
        Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5;
Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1682D46
	for <lojban@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:46:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] IP Addresses in Lojban
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:46:15 -0400
Message-ID: <2191830.KxL6YfNYEI@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.2.0-30-generic; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDUsq51P2CC8zgqv5XtF9zYZDk+oRECRLu=nHquwkftfkg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOQ8VDUsq51P2CC8zgqv5XtF9zYZDk+oRECRLu=nHquwkftfkg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best
 guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Thursday, September 27, 2012 09:08:36 Jacob Errington wrote:
> coi
> 
> I don't see why numbers couldn't do this:
> e.g. li pareze pi'e no pi'e no pi'e pa
> Indicating a port could be done with {pi}:
> e.g. li pareze pi'e no pi'e no pi'e pa pi bino

Your way of expressing IPv4 addresses is good. For IPv6 I'd use e.g. "rexanoze 
ki'o vaibifeino ki'o vononore ki'o gainoci ki'oki'o xavo pi muno". I'm not 
sure how to indicate that the port number is 0050 and not 50 (which could be 
taken as 5000, i.e. 20480). Maybe "ce'o" is better to separate the port 
number.

> Also, in the same way that denpa bu colloquially refers to the dot, how
> about we let diklo bu refer to localhost?
> 
> If so, we can attach a port to a non-number sumti referring to a URL like
> this:
> {li pi bino pe diklo bu}
> Otherwise, we can use a moi-based approach like this:
> {.i lo bino moi co me diklo bu moi} would probably convey the right
> meaning, given that the listener knows what diklo bu refers to.
> 
> Thoughts?

Localhost isn't a letter, and I don't know what letter or other character 
"diklo bu" could mean. I'd say "lo binomoi be lo kloskami".

Pierre
-- 
sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.