Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:63034)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCSMVLFP7MLRBVURSKBQKGQEXHFWCBY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1THHd0-0001fV-2e; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:12:10 -0700
Received: by yenq10 with SMTP id q10sf2118094yen.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
         :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=cyeiig5jBQ9EL6joyRcyOSC4e4C+EA6kDLSha+sZ0CM=;
        b=rHkjLMmtD9E4RUFSz5cMugphYPNMkg7W5icT0PVUr341QFWi1JdUAsPZ1j07aIIzGS
         Xo5jTfMEVOLcJaa8jo49mc8slNB6Hw354K31Wy8a/U110xT8DFGSjaUHhzb8fq97/RIk
         mRCCw6d6TSl/tD6xilN1Jj5YhmUt3wpKOlL8ZG/MWemej5FPQENo6LFdOCylbDyMhW97
         kI+15CyyTahh2vw22fg2NwbwYGsllHZ1zVczgpXvBLZiHFKTF2ptfku2nNUM02DXJiGU
         9NWqDFyC1GntzJ9Xr2Z2hAug/p7B22Nxw1ueG6tM33dc3lB8C+hz/gXkqBTPQLBLgcoQ
         DKig==
Received: by 10.52.30.164 with SMTP id t4mr1284642vdh.4.1348765910777;
        Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.141.4 with SMTP id k4ls2559108vcu.8.gmail; Thu, 27 Sep
 2012 10:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.30.133 with SMTP id s5mr1258609vdh.10.1348765909768;
        Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: triliyn <trillionalyssa@gmail.com>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <1566832d-582b-4f2a-ba49-d6398c917b47@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ8VDUsq51P2CC8zgqv5XtF9zYZDk+oRECRLu=nHquwkftfkg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOQ8VDUsq51P2CC8zgqv5XtF9zYZDk+oRECRLu=nHquwkftfkg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: IP Addresses in Lojban
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: trillionalyssa@gmail.com
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_20_1043778.1348765909356"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

------=_Part_20_1043778.1348765909356
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

What's wrong with {li diklo bu pi bi no}?

On Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:08:58 PM UTC-4, tsani wrote:
>
> coi
>
> I don't see why numbers couldn't do this:
> e.g. li pareze pi'e no pi'e no pi'e pa
> Indicating a port could be done with {pi}:
> e.g. li pareze pi'e no pi'e no pi'e pa pi bino
>
> Also, in the same way that denpa bu colloquially refers to the dot, how 
> about we let diklo bu refer to localhost?
>
> If so, we can attach a port to a non-number sumti referring to a URL like 
> this:
> {li pi bino pe diklo bu}
> Otherwise, we can use a moi-based approach like this:
> {.i lo bino moi co me diklo bu moi} would probably convey the right 
> meaning, given that the listener knows what diklo bu refers to.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> .i mi'e la tsani mu'o
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/lmpNKCbmPFAJ.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.


------=_Part_20_1043778.1348765909356
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What's wrong with {li diklo bu pi bi no}?<br><br>On Thursday, September 27,=
 2012 12:08:58 PM UTC-4, tsani wrote:<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" styl=
e=3D"margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left:=
 1ex;">coi<div><br></div><div>I don't see why numbers couldn't do this:</di=
v><div>e.g. li pareze pi'e no pi'e no pi'e pa</div><div>Indicating a port c=
ould be done with {pi}:</div><div>e.g. li pareze pi'e no pi'e no pi'e pa pi=
 bino</div>

<div><br></div><div>Also, in the same way that denpa bu colloquially refers=
 to the dot, how about we let diklo bu refer to localhost?</div><div><br></=
div><div>If so, we can attach a port to a non-number sumti referring to a U=
RL like this:</div>

<div>{li pi bino pe diklo bu}</div><div>Otherwise, we can use a moi-based a=
pproach like this:</div><div>{.i lo bino moi co me diklo bu moi} would prob=
ably convey the right meaning, given that the listener knows what diklo bu =
refers to.</div>

<div><br></div><div>Thoughts?</div><div><br></div><div>.i mi'e la tsani mu'=
o</div>
</blockquote>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.<br />
To view this discussion on the web visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.c=
om/d/msg/lojban/-/lmpNKCbmPFAJ">https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/lm=
pNKCbmPFAJ</a>.<br />=20
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.<br />



------=_Part_20_1043778.1348765909356--