Received: from mail-yx0-f189.google.com ([209.85.213.189]:64042) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TIR7m-0004VR-RE; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:47 -0700 Received: by yenq10 with SMTP id q10sf4788763yen.16 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=pAay78Hxh+UeQKTr7iKzz+1AGaxk9X+1Wc8nQvZW2AU=; b=djXg/kFM0VJtkj4UouhFe9f9LPaPsimknUyo4z8qnhi6j2Ll7ATPTnimTGrzfCl9F0 cVf5RbHknxybEvosGamxiPWbhXWUvQjXfyIgGQVbXhDszOSq4V+rlhw5ZSQ2JOG9305h xF6YsCH8ZSIQyqvRFsBZr3YrM2ndOuSUSjRBMq986CSG6344ot3nW+/DCzhsm4DXj9rv MHHYeExnsBoixtdyvFEK0HZRGElKky6Oq8O1J/mW1j/VdKwB+fYskK6srwQ53JFWu77C VIUelkLXZggTPEW3LNmRgIUCrpc8avMhHipuvlfPjIljSXirX6m5tKJoFMgZf8jmUJsM +tsg== Received: by 10.52.96.71 with SMTP id dq7mr2526258vdb.11.1349040744144; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:24 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.221.0.70 with SMTP id nl6ls4502128vcb.5.gmail; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.169.17 with SMTP id aa17mr3878809vec.29.1349040743356; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.169.17 with SMTP id aa17mr3878808vec.29.1349040743341; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ef10si792109vdb.3.2012.09.30.14.32.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.180; Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id fl13so7064238vcb.39 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.36.40 with SMTP id n8mr3809130vdj.52.1349040743176; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.48 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jacob Errington Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:32:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {kau} vs. {ba'e} To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3079b7fc48d91604caf206db X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --20cf3079b7fc48d91604caf206db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Simply because {la djan kau} is arguably never correct, {kau} can never "replace" {ba'e}. {kau} has a particular use, namely to mark indirect *questions*. {kau} on anything but a question is weird, at best, and complete nonsense, at worst. {ba'e} on the other hand marks emphasis. Emphasis and indirect questions are two separate ideas. {.i mi djuno lo du'u xukau la djan ba'e broda} "I know whether John brodas (and not whether he does/is some other selbri)" {.i mi djuno lo du'u ba'e xu kau la djan ba'e broda} "I know *whether* John brodas (and not if it pertains to some other indirect question)" The thing about {makau} is that it's somewhat referentless, like {da}, and it's best to think about {[question]-kau} constructs as being single items of the [question]'s selma'o. As for "replacing kau with ba'e", I must say that replacing *incorrect* usage of {kau}, such as {la djan kau}, with {ba'e}, in the form of {ba'e la djan} is a very excellent solution. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o On 30 September 2012 04:48, la gleki wrote: > It was previously mentioned that > {.i ko'a broda xu = .i xu ko'a ba'e broda} > > The example > > http://dag.github.com/cll/11/8/ > > 8.4) mi djuno le du'u > la djan. kau pu > klama le zarci > I know the predication-of/fact-that > John [indirect question] [past] > going to the store. > I know who went to the store, namely John. > I know that it was John who went to the store. > > > is rather interesting. > It shows the shift of focus to {la djan.} > > Then why not use {kau} instead of {ba'e} all the time? > {mi kau djuno le du'u la djan. kau pu klama lo zarci} ? > If you need arrange foci by their strength you can always say > > {mi kausai djuno le du'u la djan. kau pu klama lo zarci}. > > So my question is: > in what cases {ba'e} is irreplaceable? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/1sRlldvrIIEJ. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --20cf3079b7fc48d91604caf206db Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simply because {la djan kau} is arguably never correct, {kau} can never &qu= ot;replace" {ba'e}. {kau} has a particular use, namely to mark ind= irect *questions*. {kau} on anything but a question is weird, at best, and = complete nonsense, at worst.

{ba'e} on the other hand marks emphasis. Emphasis and in= direct questions are two separate ideas.=A0

{.i mi= djuno lo du'u xukau la djan ba'e broda} "I know whether John = brodas (and not whether he does/is some other selbri)"
{.i mi djuno lo du'u ba'e xu kau la djan ba'e broda} "= ;I know *whether* John brodas (and not if it pertains to some other indirec= t question)"

The thing about {makau} is that = it's somewhat referentless, like {da}, and it's best to think about= {[question]-kau} constructs as being single items of the [question]'s = selma'o.

As for "replacing kau with ba'e", I must = say that replacing *incorrect* usage of {kau}, such as {la djan kau}, with = {ba'e}, in the form of {ba'e la djan} is a very excellent solution.=

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

On 30 September 2012 04:48, la gleki <= ;gleki.is.m= y.name@gmail.com> wrote:
It was previously mentioned that=A0
{.i ko'a broda xu =3D .i xu ko'a ba'e broda}
<= br>
The example

<= div>
8.4) =A0 mi djuno le du'u
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0la = djan. kau pu
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0klama le zarci
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I know the predication-of/fact-that
=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0John [indirect question] [past]
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0going to the store.
=A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0I know who went to the store, namely John.
=A0 =A0 =A0= =A0I know that it was John who went to the store.
<= br>
is rather interesting.
It shows the shift of focus to {la djan.}

The= n why not use {kau} instead of {ba'e} all the time?
{mi kau d= juno le du'u la djan. kau pu klama lo zarci} ?
If you need ar= range foci by their strength you can always say

{mi kausai djuno le du'u la djan. kau pu klama lo z= arci}.

So my question is:
in what cases = {ba'e} is irreplaceable?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com= /d/msg/lojban/-/1sRlldvrIIEJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--20cf3079b7fc48d91604caf206db--