Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:38763) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TIRBA-0004YF-Pt; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:36:14 -0700 Received: by qabg14 with SMTP id g14sf1836708qab.16 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=1kpG8LBCVmmxnT2AYJeq6dgnJJLYrSzlgmYHePqhj44=; b=CpgR1Z5Wpk1UdhL7P9WZrnGGgoCUaybu2EicHX0Dd6DkG9VyLNKRP2AQLSKOanjVhk NN/I2fzptVAL3c/lGC46E/mvd2AwxHnKgBm13kGo//2FmoZKZEW650eZAtfsSbaMk4dZ 0zSgzy+9cqyzBySXqHujIZi+Befg5gaCkYcqBidsPHGpKzoFYXIz7OJtyCZJmHk9XWy6 v4DMs+GNzPWKvRAnqyk9XZ+sPpf4zULq7MQ9q9lVdspdu1tus3tfhKx8cpK5bU22doql tBbD0lQ63BYFNACcKcSm0mwbo2Fu/B26MA/FxsaQKOMqS3/QRuK/1ZzYNo4yIxClmnCl n20A== Received: by 10.52.29.225 with SMTP id n1mr1132417vdh.5.1349040953998; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.21.40 with SMTP id s8ls4532046vde.8.gmail; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.67.38 with SMTP id k6mr3397255vdt.2.1349040953449; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.67.38 with SMTP id k6mr3397254vdt.2.1349040953382; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com (mail-vb0-f41.google.com [209.85.212.41]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r14si792603vdu.1.2012.09.30.14.35.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.41; Received: by vbkv13 with SMTP id v13so5926685vbk.14 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.150.134 with SMTP id y6mr7251322vcv.20.1349040953221; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.48 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jacob Errington Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:35:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] What place of nesting bridi {ce'u} refers to? To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04389363cde38704caf2127a X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --f46d04389363cde38704caf2127a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It'd be nice if the gimste mentioned to which higher-level sumti places the ce'u referred to, much like guaspi's gimste, but that isn't the case. On 30 September 2012 00:56, la gleki wrote: > http://dag.github.com/cll/7/11/ > > 11.1) le ka ce'u gleki > the property-of (X being-happy) > the property of being happy > happiness > > and > > 11.2) le ka gleki ce'u > the property-of (being-happy about-X) > the property of being that which someone is happy about > > > > These examples are pretty clear. No ambiguity. Now let's open Chapter 11.4 > http://dag.github.com/cll/11/4/ > > 4.9) la djan. cu zmadu la djordj. le ka mi prami ce'u > John exceeds George in-the property-of (I love X). > > > > This is something very strange. > Let's imagine that I'm a boy and I meet a girl. I tell her > > {do melbi mi lo ka ce'u clani} > > Does {ce'u} refer to {do} or {mi}? > > It definitely refers to melbi1. If x3 is the aspect in which x1 is beautiful, it's pretty clear that it's the x1 that is referred to by the argument place in clani. .i mi'e la tsani mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --f46d04389363cde38704caf2127a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It'd be nice if the gimste mentioned to which higher-level sumti places= the ce'u referred to, much like guaspi's gimste, but that isn'= t the case.

On 30 September 2012 00:56, = la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
http://dag.github.com/cll/7/=
11/
11.1)  le ka ce'u gleki
       the property-of (X being-happy)
       the property of being happy
       happiness
and11.2) le ka gleki ce'u the property-of (being-happy about-X) the property of being that which someone is happy about
<= div>

These examples are pretty clear. No ambig= uity. Now let's open Chapter 11.4

4.9)   la djan. cu zmadu =
la djordj. le ka mi prami ce'u
       John exceeds George in-the property-of (I love X).
<= br>

This is something very strange.
Let&= #39;s imagine that I'm a boy and I meet a girl. I tell her

{do melbi mi lo ka ce'u clani}
=A0
Does {ce'u} refer= to {do} or {mi}?


It definitely refers to mel= bi1. If x3 is the aspect in which x1 is beautiful, it's pretty clear th= at it's the x1 that is referred to by the argument place in clani.

.i mi'e la tsani mu'o

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--f46d04389363cde38704caf2127a--