Received: from mail-fa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]:44403) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TImOr-0007d5-OK; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:15:43 -0700 Received: by fapp1 with SMTP id p1sf2488065fap.16 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:15:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N6+mMK0UmWQU2OQ6MUk8k8TymMTim1rGUNAgUqMMm9g=; b=fz5hdYp3Dyw3dK4kKwyWcifgEs80vtRHxck19KAJPkX7DbvRmMTkKkjqI3Tti4PVI+ LlztiuHUoUjFdD1OpFdBKOvhaAJkzjsnNyU9ZHPRd2jvonftRvvqy11WbekKLgzsbcWt f+iLROCvjOr0Jey8Yu10iCHZ7ay4kETSQipWXNO51eHo5LKWYHO5+g03s75acCIpH/xH jLizPYNaefBw/f5kBvAxWKeH/X/jheIkqCEjqTNLqM0JZsGhi8zhb3S5J1LUC0v116mn 59d0XuUXCWsSoz0VMethmDiThRVi8kJsZiMTm27AIu8xGDzKsucVDFnhH6V24hhYTCHE u+EQ== Received: by 10.216.205.155 with SMTP id j27mr546988weo.22.1349122522690; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.78.230 with SMTP id e6ls7508371wix.4.gmail; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.105.41 with SMTP id gj9mr658758wib.3.1349122522029; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.105.41 with SMTP id gj9mr658757wib.3.1349122522020; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.23]) by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id k11si1237497wiv.0.2012.10.01.13.15.21; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23; Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Oct 2012 20:15:21 -0000 Received: from p57A08E0F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.142.15] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 01 Oct 2012 22:15:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #54293076 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19iyFNhTCpi1GzSz6XE0bdB8VX1yjAGn/ReFfBbED kBk7CSG4t0EtYP Message-ID: <5069F9D3.804@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:15:15 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] What place of nesting bridi {ce'u} refers to? References: <20121001200454.GV1589@nvg.org> In-Reply-To: <20121001200454.GV1589@nvg.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Am 01.10.2012 22:04, schrieb Arnt Richard Johansen: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:56:59AM -0700, la gleki wrote: > >> These examples are pretty clear. No ambiguity. Now let's open Chapter 11= .4 >> http://dag.github.com/cll/11/4/ >> >> 4.9) la djan. cu zmadu la djordj. le ka mi prami ce'u >> John exceeds George in-the property-of (I love X). >> >> This is something very strange. >> Let's imagine that I'm a boy and I meet a girl. I tell her >> >> {do melbi mi lo ka ce'u clani} >> >> Does {ce'u} refer to {do} or {mi}? > Neither. {ce'u} does not refer to anything, and that's sort of the whole = point. The clause refers to a =E2=80=9Cproperty=E2=80=9D of being tall *in = the abstract*, not that of someone in particular being tall. Yes, but the ce'u place gets filled later by one of the sumti in the=20 parent bridi, and that is what the question was about. > * lo ka mi clani > my height > > * lo ka do clani > your height > > * lo ka lo penbi cu clani > a pen being long These are very non-standard, and probably many would call them=20 incorrect. The only way I can see to make these work is to say that "lo=20 ka mi clani" is to be interpreted as "lo ka mi no'u ce'u clani", or else=20 the "ce'u" would end up in a different sumti place and the meaning would=20 change drastically. > * lo ka clani > being long (OR being a dimension of length OR being a standard of leng= th) Right, but much more than with "ke'a", where this is handled much more=20 loosely, the convention is that "ce'u" fills the first empty slot. mu'o mi'e la selpa'i --=20 pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.