Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:38684) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TInAu-0007ql-Ov; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:21 -0700 Received: by qabg14 with SMTP id g14sf14095qab.16 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=XL3voO+aUGvm223W8XUkPGjRUZMBWG3JBaTaTxkpvt8=; b=Ij2V8vq/WByYW8qlKROfNawWOxf8hayY7KcRNNthNp7DRc20LiTfBI766q0c1SVV1v hpdwAa98/nYj892G01J9IxZu9l3sSXpQPZPIpoJb8oawzszOUI9qChwIduXAvptZuwmB usM5jiXI7PuT+HMECCxperfOgkde4DOChISHCv+Apg3xqJSa2JeiUXrn7ZxOAJMvbWIF 5w0Q+U2JzuRtbczqabMTvSfKSbBdTRoU2emWDPf2fZAesQs9pppKeNZHha6SB0epH+l4 lACf25YjlYl8NJDoQOAw2w7IkA16evSGL6eafG/ia0e+fPzZYsY6IpKiZ9YTh1+jh/NG ah5w== Received: by 10.52.175.5 with SMTP id bw5mr3060475vdc.16.1349125506165; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:06 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.221.0.70 with SMTP id nl6ls5280298vcb.5.gmail; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.151.104 with SMTP id up8mr4837081veb.6.1349125505660; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.151.104 with SMTP id up8mr4837079veb.6.1349125505648; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com (mail-vc0-f171.google.com [209.85.220.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r14si941174vdu.1.2012.10.01.14.05.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.171; Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id m18so14919563vcm.16 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.37.194 with SMTP id y2mr8934473vcd.44.1349125505448; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.48 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:04:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <23276b4b-763f-4c74-afbc-a5bebd13387b@googlegroups.com> References: <23276b4b-763f-4c74-afbc-a5bebd13387b@googlegroups.com> From: Jacob Errington Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:04:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] {kau} vs. {ba'e} To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54eea8e827c9104cb05c264 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --bcaec54eea8e827c9104cb05c264 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 1 October 2012 03:05, la gleki wrote: > > > On Monday, October 1, 2012 1:32:24 AM UTC+4, tsani wrote: >> >> Simply because {la djan kau} is arguably never correct, {kau} can never >> "replace" {ba'e}. {kau} has a particular use, namely to mark indirect >> *questions*. {kau} on anything but a question is weird, at best, and >> complete nonsense, at worst. >> >> {ba'e} on the other hand marks emphasis. Emphasis and indirect questions >> are two separate ideas. >> >> {.i mi djuno lo du'u xukau la djan ba'e broda} "I know whether John >> brodas (and not whether he does/is some other selbri)" >> {.i mi djuno lo du'u ba'e xu kau la djan ba'e broda} "I know *whether* >> John brodas (and not if it pertains to some other indirect question)" >> >> The thing about {makau} is that it's somewhat referentless, like {da}, >> and it's best to think about {[question]-kau} constructs as being single >> items of the [question]'s selma'o. >> >> As for "replacing kau with ba'e", I must say that replacing *incorrect* >> usage of {kau}, such as {la djan kau}, with {ba'e}, in the form of {ba'e la >> djan} is a very excellent solution. >> > > So is it something that needs to be fixed in this chapter of the CLL? > In my very honest opinion, yes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --bcaec54eea8e827c9104cb05c264 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1 October 2012 03:05, la gleki <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com= > wrote:


On Monday, October 1, 2012 1:32:24 AM UTC+4, tsan= i wrote:
Simply because {la djan kau= } is arguably never correct, {kau} can never "replace" {ba'e}= . {kau} has a particular use, namely to mark indirect *questions*. {kau} on= anything but a question is weird, at best, and complete nonsense, at worst= .

{ba'e} on the other hand marks emphasis. Emphasis and in= direct questions are two separate ideas.=A0

{.i mi= djuno lo du'u xukau la djan ba'e broda} "I know whether John = brodas (and not whether he does/is some other selbri)"
{.i mi djuno lo du'u ba'e xu kau la djan ba'e broda} "= ;I know *whether* John brodas (and not if it pertains to some other indirec= t question)"

The thing about {makau} is that = it's somewhat referentless, like {da}, and it's best to think about= {[question]-kau} constructs as being single items of the [question]'s = selma'o.

As for "replacing kau with ba'e", I must = say that replacing *incorrect* usage of {kau}, such as {la djan kau}, with = {ba'e}, in the form of {ba'e la djan} is a very excellent solution.=

So is it something that needs to be = fixed in this chapter of the CLL?=A0

= In my very honest opinion, yes.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--bcaec54eea8e827c9104cb05c264--