Received: from mail-la0-f61.google.com ([209.85.215.61]:43495)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBC65FOEL4UJRBWNTVSBQKGQEKKDHNMA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TJ5Zx-0007Rf-W6; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:44:29 -0700
Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12sf925744lag.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-authenticated:x-provags-id:message-id
         :date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :x-y-gmx-trusted:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id
         :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=0CGQMfznVHeHlEbWXHB4tZ73MjWbC+IHjTAmEXqTwZk=;
        b=okU9dXJS9r/4ldn2W91KDoAKxrvzRVoc0chYf0yE6GkM/PxJmFQQyIixtXZAcjFBsb
         vbb/e81IpUbUQi81iKuf7M29ICWVnpMfvKtw9Fyv8UPtZasHrt67ph2708esGTH41gra
         DKLjZVBh6orrixtAiLR1s1/DroG77gEvdJ035P8MGr5yhGlsxpmNm1BtzNa4HBN+rx7V
         5eBgtCtJGnkCLxLFtLAW5TNzUhvk8pjB1iAjS8ySrfjKzu17vyUnzgk3tlKJZcmV2ILy
         3bnPKLoIKA+3ND9xX+xd7AKcbfV3rPsR0I4TvRux8ut9dTdxWsFoQTz4WYwsYWa53LXt
         80ag==
Received: by 10.180.101.6 with SMTP id fc6mr1798539wib.4.1349196250007;
        Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.73.226 with SMTP id o2ls1765498wiv.0.gmail; Tue, 02 Oct
 2012 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr2885846wib.4.1349196249451;
        Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr2885845wib.4.1349196249435;
        Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net. [213.165.64.23])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id cx9si183947wib.0.2012.10.02.09.44.09;
        Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) client-ip=213.165.64.23;
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Oct 2012 16:44:06 -0000
Received: from p57A08B02.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.33]) [87.160.139.2]
  by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 02 Oct 2012 18:44:06 +0200
X-Authenticated: #54293076
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX180A9sPLZQ0x5MH7cECeBR0LqoelugjJm75BcUtt5
	J6oirIOHdDvkvw
Message-ID: <506B19D1.8090704@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:44:01 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] {kau} vs. {ba'e}
References: <b8c0afc7-f6e0-411e-a220-8802cb006316@googlegroups.com> <CAOQ8VDXVyZf_STyTgS1aFhLUMsdxr=kxxVoesuQuXwu69CGa2w@mail.gmail.com> <23276b4b-763f-4c74-afbc-a5bebd13387b@googlegroups.com> <CAOQ8VDUnUJkyh24=y2HOUs3EzHY49JMDL+dQRKUBO2RPy9+rOw@mail.gmail.com> <CABM8VqcY8dJ2A_3T0pqW7vRRSoK3_K9=tmLbRxO7KU+YgQw0bw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABM8VqcY8dJ2A_3T0pqW7vRRSoK3_K9=tmLbRxO7KU+YgQw0bw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------080909050906080304060601"
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080909050906080304060601
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 02.10.2012 18:19, schrieb Adam Lopresto:
>
> {kau} on a non-question word (in a context where an indirect question=20
> would make sense) has a simple and obvious meaning: it's the=20
> *answer*to the indirect question. It's not just any old form of=20
> emphasis. No need to change anything about the language but your own=20
> (mis)understanding.

I agree. That's how kau has been used with non-question words and it=20
makes sense to me. It's certainly not nonsense.

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--=20
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

doi. m=C4=8Dlbi mlen=C4=9B'u
    .i do c=C5=95tlu ki'u
ma fe la x=C5=95mpre u(u
    .i do t=C4=9Bnsa c=C5=95rmi
gi'e s=C4=9Brji se t=C5=95rmi
    .i tai. bo pu c=C4=9Btka lo gr=C5=95na ku

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.


--------------080909050906080304060601
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>Am 02.10.2012 18:19, schrieb Adam
        Lopresto:</tt><tt><br>
      </tt></div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CABM8VqcY8dJ2A_3T0pqW7vRRSoK3_K9=tmLbRxO7KU+YgQw0bw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div class="gmail_quote"><tt><br>
        </tt>
        <div><tt>{</tt><tt>kau} on a non-question word (in a context
            where an indirect question would make sense) has a simple
            and obvious meaning: it's the </tt><tt><b>answer</b></tt><tt>
            to the indirect question. It's not just any old form of
            emphasis. No need to change anything about the language but
            your own (mis)understanding.</tt><tt><br>
          </tt></div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <tt><br>
    </tt><tt>I agree. That's how kau has been used with non-question
      words and it makes sense to me. It's certainly not nonsense.<br>
      <br>
      mu'o mi'e la selpa'i<br>
    </tt><tt></tt>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

do&#7883; m&egrave;lbi mlen&igrave;'u
   .i do c&agrave;tlu ki'u
ma fe la x&agrave;mpre &#365;u
   .i do t&igrave;nsa c&agrave;rmi
gi'e s&igrave;rji se t&agrave;rmi
   .i ta&#7883; bo pu c&igrave;tka lo gr&agrave;na ku</pre>
  </body>
</html>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.<br />
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.<br />

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.<br />



--------------080909050906080304060601--