Received: from mail-oa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.219.61]:38621) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TJGxZ-00054G-Ih; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:53:33 -0700 Received: by oago6 with SMTP id o6sf6207717oag.16 for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:53:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=2Pg+Zc8iED3TM9dnSthd8JVhNX1fTWJSI9QP3poPIPk=; b=tHcFAikdycs6/W+eoixrrcL3DjEIrXRDchG5TorUm+eyqUiUVZSFVwWwCyKRWBEtib vhsAzpErnzRuTRcfIlHsUhbZTPCusJWob0P3UkA6ipQaixrvLkJAhzR59RajkfsJ1q66 n3bxlSqCkN1Y1DfqNl3f16fpy8wFue/oDV9xvB73OdQoWxSnL4lMHPgNIBZuThPIgX6u GRb7u8jK4VWEf84eOGfAsVRgoXgOiSb2uvGm2zKjYC/pLlo/Rem9mVnyOW3FQBO95P6D /l3lsmeE9J3fguYabnmdVW59MG/YdpAaXk8Wq/GPcyohSnJFI3KXRAZ4v+Wl46cX0sXA E2PQ== Received: by 10.52.175.5 with SMTP id bw5mr63002vdc.16.1349239998775; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:53:18 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.141.4 with SMTP id k4ls942659vcu.8.gmail; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.71.38 with SMTP id r6mr68571vdu.12.1349239998133; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:53:16 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <506B19D1.8090704@gmx.de> References: <23276b4b-763f-4c74-afbc-a5bebd13387b@googlegroups.com> <506B19D1.8090704@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [lojban] {kau} vs. {ba'e} MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1142_31963373.1349239996910" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_1142_31963373.1349239996910 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:44:10 PM UTC+4, selpa'i wrote: > > Am 02.10.2012 18:19, schrieb Adam Lopresto: > =20 > > {kau} on a non-question word (in a context where an indirect question=20 > would make sense) has a simple and obvious meaning: it's the *answer* to= =20 > the indirect question. It's not just any old form of emphasis. No need to= =20 > change anything about the language but your own (mis)understanding. > =20 > > I agree. That's how kau has been used with non-question words and it make= s=20 > sense to me. It's certainly not nonsense. > Then more explanation needs to be added if at least two jbopre=20 misunderstand this.=20 > > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > =20 > --=20 > pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo > > do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u > .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u > ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu > .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi > gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi > .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku > >=20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/iHV8gUpPy_oJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_1142_31963373.1349239996910 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 8:44:10 PM UTC+4, selpa'i wrote: =20 =20 =20
Am 02.10.2012 18:19, schrieb Adam Lopresto:

{kau} on a non-question word (in a context where an indirect question would make sense) has a simple and obvious meaning: it's the answer to the indirect question. It's not just any old form of emphasis. No need to change anything about the language but your own (mis)understanding.

I agree. That's how kau has been used with non-question words and it makes sense to me. It's certainly not nonsense.
=

Then more explanation needs to be ad= ded if at least two jbopre misunderstand this. 

mu'o mi'e la selpa'i
--=20
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u
   .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u
ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu
   .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi
gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi
   .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/iH= V8gUpPy_oJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_1142_31963373.1349239996910--