Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:41146) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TJmwl-0003fS-1n; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:02:47 -0700 Received: by mail-qa0-f61.google.com with SMTP id g14sf619262qab.16 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:02:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=4hRUod4LdsO30q5FJ9+cHcMmdZwC2x24Jb+uFiLeYfA=; b=Ph1l4qpN13Vf4no3lEuSjy4T+kznc7q2Bx6+Gid+fzcCe8Ut8myNH3QB+o5HXoursG kYpwWY+fqPlVFB37q8T4CMaRGATQtPlld7Sw2G2GsTa21976NvPQvXMf8gKIKR7HlS1R +ILCkfGOEf1VGnzxEa2fh0L52m7IMwSilVwmlUvaCEqYWx7pNSJeRHzMo3YruOMBMTQZ cL9wW4lbeLvMcqZWkEp+STP1ZBBXkX1g09wZmG+gcLP722P/UJrbOV9RzNFkRkWCftUF 5zV+MU7lS1DHl0Drr090iPfWweDk24sdCCIm53R7vge96tWsJCeLPdmzzlBu/ykvYFQt +EyQ== Received: by 10.52.96.71 with SMTP id dq7mr1096836vdb.11.1349362954459; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:02:34 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.20.7 with SMTP id j7ls2281843vde.0.gmail; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.71.109 with SMTP id t13mr993711vdu.0.1349362953110; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 08:02:32 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <506D82E4.3080604@gmx.de> References: <20121001200454.GV1589@nvg.org> <5069F9D3.804@gmx.de> <58680262-ade6-45c0-bd7b-875fcc55a353@googlegroups.com> <6468a0a7-357d-4f07-9f02-1da61a75374c@googlegroups.com> <506C65FF.2040907@gmx.de> <506D82E4.3080604@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [lojban] What place of nesting bridi {ce'u} refers to? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_433_20929541.1349362952736" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_433_20929541.1349362952736 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday, October 4, 2012 4:36:54 PM UTC+4, selpa'i wrote: > > Am 04.10.2012 09:34, schrieb la gleki: > =20 > > =20 >> I'm not sure what you mean by=20 >> =20 >> I don't like how gua\spi works here cuz as i can see it demands using= =20 >> another gismu every time you change the value of {ce'u}. >> >> >> Can you show me what you mean? >> > > Although it's not the right place to discuss it here please translate to= =20 > gua\spi > > > So I have to translate this for you, but you don't like how it works? I'm= =20 > not sure you can properly judge it then. > I have a general idea how it should be translated into gua\spi. The problem of translation might be of a philosophical kind. > > 1."I want to eat an apple". > > > The normal way uses an infinitive compound: > > ^:i \ji /daw crw \xo plyw > > But you can also use an explicit infinitive: > > ^:i \ji /daw \vo crw \xo plyw > > 2."I want you to eat an apple". > > > ^:i \ji /gu pli \ju ^vo crw \xo plyw > > or > > ^:i \ji ^ju /gu pli \crw \xo plyw > But I have a clear feeling that in both sentences the same semantic prime= =20 can be used. And this prime describes "desire". Lojban can replace {ce'u} with anything. Natlangs can do the same. gua\spi= =20 can't. {to zoi gy. I don't want to criticize gua\spi anymore. gy. toi} > > =20 > btw, what is your opinion about {ka=3Dsu'u ce'u}? > > > I'm not sure how to answer that question. You can say that ka is du'u=20 > ce'u, I don't know what the advantage is in defining ka in terms of su'u,= =20 > because to me su'u could then mean nu or ni, which means that ka could=20 > become nu ce'u or ni ce'u. So why not use a more precise abstractor? Also= ,=20 > what is the point anyway? ka has at least one ce'u in it, that's pretty= =20 > clear to almost everyone. Why do you need to use su'u here?=20 > Well, I used su'u because wasn't sure about {du'u}. And {* lo ka lo penbi= =20 cu clani } had bewildered me. I just wanna know whether it would be correct to add the definition of=20 {ka=3Ddu'u ce'u} into jvs or not. > mu'o mi'e la selpa'i > =20 > --=20 > pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo > > do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u > .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u > ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu > .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi > gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi > .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku > >=20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/kRgbs4FH6N4J. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_433_20929541.1349362952736 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, October 4, 2012 4:36:54 PM UTC+4, selpa'i wrote: =20 =20 =20
Am 04.10.2012 09:34, schrieb la gleki:


I'm not sure what you mean by

I don't like how gua\spi works here cuz as i can see it demands using another gismu every time you change the value of {ce'u}.

Can you show me what you mean?

Although it's not the right place to discuss it here please translate to gua\spi

So I have to translate this for you, but you don't like how it works? I'm not sure you can properly judge it then.


I have a general idea how it sh= ould be translated into gua\spi.
The problem of translation might= be of a philosophical kind.




1."I want to eat an apple".

The normal way uses an infinitive compound:

^:i
\ji /daw crw \xo plyw

But you can also use an explicit infinitive:

^:i \ji /daw \vo crw \xo plyw

2."I want you to eat an apple".

^:i \ji /gu pli \ju ^vo crw \xo plyw

or

^:i \ji ^ju /gu pli \crw \xo plyw
But I have a clear feeling that in both sentences the same sema= ntic prime can be used. And this prime describes "desire".
Lojban= can replace {ce'u} with anything. Natlangs can do the same. gua\spi can't.= {to zoi gy. I don't want to criticize gua\spi anymore. gy. toi}
=



btw, what is your opinion about {ka=3Dsu'u ce'u}?

I'm not sure how to answer that question. You can say that ka is du'u ce'u, I don't know what the advantage is in defining ka in terms of su'u, because to me su'u could then mean nu or ni, which means that ka could become nu ce'u or ni ce'u. So why not use a more precise abstractor? Also, what is the point anyway? ka has at least one ce'u in it, that's pretty clear to almost everyone. Why do you need to use su'u here?

Well, I used su'u because wasn't sure about {du'u}. = And {* lo ka lo penbi cu clani } had bewildered me.
I just w= anna know whether it would be correct to add the definition of {ka=3Ddu'u c= e'u} into jvs or not.



mu'o mi'e la selpa'i

--=20
pilno zo le xu .i lo dei bangu cu se cmene zo lojbo .e nai zo lejbo

do=E1=BB=8B m=C3=A8lbi mlen=C3=AC'u
   .i do c=C3=A0tlu ki'u
ma fe la x=C3=A0mpre =C5=ADu
   .i do t=C3=ACnsa c=C3=A0rmi
gi'e s=C3=ACrji se t=C3=A0rmi
   .i ta=E1=BB=8B bo pu c=C3=ACtka lo gr=C3=A0na ku

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/kR= gbs4FH6N4J.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_433_20929541.1349362952736--