Received: from mail-qc0-f189.google.com ([209.85.216.189]:43537) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TRCkQ-0005OL-H3; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:50 -0700 Received: by mail-qc0-f189.google.com with SMTP id c11sf492206qca.16 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=h99KEXAUJTMVz926sqkCAlty4YkrCAdoF+4NFQn/bjM=; b=bL34CF1JxomrDxwFmB23WxDyHA6xM6Eveigj3zv3aImBxrkg5T2GlrruwjEXGMjWw7 o47QhIehRiLAK4dOSXtTqhafJzVJisR+UAXdVgk0OiCS2h7Q5eab7ff4PUlg8gT2/J6U 5W/CjXto/VBPxzpeRJR5UwX/6G2j9EjRsZPXRVM0zARBgx4ksg7gFNi9vrhnhvZ86Q/j KdeX1Rzdokv/W6flWxHC+i1DG3ydT4iUdH27U178dwQ5QjE4IAQ3+bvQK/FGDE7WOs+Z uk1yVf19/Kkl1y2dsrXYxhExV4TE59RJ4KLSDh+jJzfsvUabAOfBpRH2fovtp/a1HKCw knfQ== Received: by 10.52.96.71 with SMTP id dq7mr3325919vdb.11.1351130431795; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.107.208 with SMTP id c16ls2842608vcp.3.gmail; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.246.37 with SMTP id xt5mr7220633vec.13.1351130431463; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.246.37 with SMTP id xt5mr7220632vec.13.1351130431445; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com (mail-vc0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bn19si4404788vdb.0.2012.10.24.19.00.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.178; Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id gb30so1589923vcb.37 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.247.165 with SMTP id yf5mr32308097vec.50.1351130431049; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.89.84 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jacob Errington Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [lojban] The fire's hotness To: lojban@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: nictytan@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of nictytan@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=nictytan@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0f14e634ffb04ccd891fa X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7bf0f14e634ffb04ccd891fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 24 October 2012 18:22, Mike S. wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Jacob Errington wrote: > >> Although I don't fully follow what it is you're trying to get at here, >> it's generally agreed upon that using ka that way is no good. In general >> use, ka is used only for "pure functions" -- properties and not qualitites, >> which is how the CLL describes ka. > > > Okay. > > > That being said, I'd just use {nu}, which I believe represents an >> particular instance of a predication, which is just a property with the >> ce'u-places filled in: >> >> {lo nu lo fagri cu glare cu pluka mi} >> or perhaps, >> {lo nu seli'i lo fagri cu glare cu pluka mi} >> > > The second one is interesting. Instead of "nu seli'i", why not just > "li'i"? Is "nu" rquired by pluka? > > Not at all. You could use bare {li'i} {.i lo li'i fagri glare cu pluka mi} If you ask me, it's a beautiful way of saying it, albeit uncommon. (I don't recall ever seeing this, but it's semantically correct in my opinion.) > -- > co ma'a mke > > Xorban blog: Xorban.wordpress.com > My LL blog: Loglang.wordpress.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "lojban" group. > To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en. --047d7bf0f14e634ffb04ccd891fa Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24 October 2012 18:22, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:=

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:= 20 PM, Jacob Errington <nictytan@gmail.com> wrote:
Although I don't fully follow what it is you're trying to get at he= re, it's generally agreed upon that using ka that way is no good. In ge= neral use, ka is used only for "pure functions" -- properties and= not qualitites, which is how the CLL describes ka.

Okay.
=A0

That being said, I'd just use {nu}, which I believe represen= ts an particular instance of a predication, which is just a property with t= he ce'u-places filled in:

{lo nu lo fagri cu g= lare cu pluka mi}
or perhaps,
{lo nu seli'i lo fagri cu glare cu pluka mi}=

The second one is interesting.=A0 Instead= of "nu seli'i", why not just "li'i"?=A0 Is &qu= ot;nu" rquired by pluka?=A0
=A0

Not at all. You could u= se bare {li'i}
{.i lo li'i fagri glare cu pluka mi}
=
If you ask me, it's a beautiful way of saying it, albeit uncommon.= (I don't recall ever seeing this, but it's semantically correct in= my opinion.)
=A0
--
co ma'a mk= e

Xorban blog: Xor= ban.wordpress.com
My LL blog: Loglang.wordpress.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojba= n?hl=3Den.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
--047d7bf0f14e634ffb04ccd891fa--