Received: from mail-pb0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:61604) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1TU24a-000688-GK; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:13:18 -0700 Received: by mail-pb0-f61.google.com with SMTP id rp8sf2008912pbb.16 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:13:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=M2QEUZRO/oeYe0MuzDT3yL7enMvfiX1NcMBbp0aiC7U=; b=GWqIFE6mKzxwZDcDuowlSrU+SL90w+9tV5Y5JJTMWrRHxLToJBJOVB00eT8sDX5dKO n4NOk2QPSLzMltaXamKV+pgW6KXuQ17j6DsmlGygDkAb0JPqA0dFPejnVqWAYmPAu+Ei WP67556xpcdT7tgdKie0kCXL53AknEhurTXBfj51cf5PIe81Mk82MUgNh/+1hVfkkT3i 5/EW7GMcXbMfzqDXcRG8CTFlSjfCZbzOEXS2X2p0XFJbxTTdKHhzzoO3jZrSumaRbCcq tAObBG5eVvR3cH+jWnJFaMnRjdl+K1hU5LzrsjO93a5XyCqOeiqRu8EsvT31auXbqWjc +lSw== Received: by 10.236.149.66 with SMTP id w42mr4184501yhj.18.1351804381875; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:13:01 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.142.195 with SMTP id i43ls4527498yhj.4.gmail; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.192.164 with SMTP id i24mr4171840yhn.14.1351804381479; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:13:00 -0700 (PDT) From: jesushlincoln@gmail.com To: lojban@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <7bc53f1a-cb90-4469-b6be-8a59c9eec194@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <2156101.XrGZRxVJYE@caracal> References: <201009300801.24131.phma@phma.optus.nu> <2156101.XrGZRxVJYE@caracal> Subject: Re: [lojban] To Polish fellow lojbanists MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: jesushlincoln@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_660_31691082.1351804380559" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / ------=_Part_660_31691082.1351804380559 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But the question as to stress is only tangential to the underlying=20 phonotactical issue that it implies--namely, first off, zo pei is defined= =20 as being, by definition, one syllable because it contains only a=20 non-syllabic consonant and diphthong, as per LBG 3.9. However, the=20 allophonic pronunciation zo pe,i [p=C9=9B.i] phonetically contains two=20 syllables. Because under CLL 3.3 the comma can be pronounced as an=20 apostrophe in all situations (which is a 'rule' most jbopre to my=20 understanding already pretend never existed in the first place), but also= =20 under the same CLL chapter as well as LGB a comma is quote a "syllable=20 break" which is pronounced as two distinct syllables, it is clear that zo= =20 pei, if considered phonologically equivalent to zo pe,i, would then have to= =20 constitute both one and two syllables simultaneously, which doesn't seem to= =20 make much sense. This is not even mentioning the potential confusion with= =20 zo pe'i, with which the main differentiation between it and zo pei seems to= =20 be moreso the disyllabicity as opposed to the presence or nonpresence of an= =20 [h] phoneme/allophone. mi'e la'oi jesushlincoln On Thursday, November 1, 2012 4:52:31 PM UTC-4, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > On Thursday, November 01, 2012 13:00:16 jesush...@gmail.com = wrote:=20 > > If [p=C9=9B.i] =3D [p=C9=9Bi], what about cmavo stress rules? According= to CLL 3.3 a=20 > > comma is a syllable break, but according to LBG 3.9 a diphthong always= =20 > > counts as one syllable. On what syllable would [p=C9=9B.i] be stressed,= given=20 > > that [p=C9=9Bi] only has one syllable to stress?=20 > > There's no official rule yet about which vowel of a diphthong to stress. = I=20 > think=20 > that, in a stressed diphthong, the first vowel of a falling diphthong and= =20 > the=20 > second vowel of a rising diphthong should be stressed: =C3=A9i, i=C3=B3, = u=C3=AD, i=C3=BA.=20 > > There is no rule about stressing cmavo, except that, if stressed, a cmavo= =20 > before a brivla may need to be separated from it by a pause. E.g.=20 > "l=C3=B3krat=C3=A1igo"=20 > =3D "lokra tai go" (crustacean like iff) but "l=C3=B3.krat=C3=A1igo" =3D = "lo krataigo"=20 > (a=20 > hawthorn).=20 > > Pierre=20 > --=20 > gau do li'i co'e kei do=20 > > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lo= jban/-/gBKl7LPtGrMJ. To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den. ------=_Part_660_31691082.1351804380559 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But the question as to stress is only tangential to the underlying phonotac= tical issue that it implies--namely, first off, zo pei is defined as being,= by definition, one syllable because it contains only a non-syllabic conson= ant and diphthong, as per LBG 3.9. However, the allophonic pronunciation zo= pe,i [p=C9=9B.i] phonetically contains two syllables. Because under CLL 3.= 3 the comma can be pronounced as an apostrophe in all situations (which is = a 'rule' most jbopre to my understanding already pretend never existed in t= he first place), but also under the same CLL chapter as well as LGB a comma= is quote a "syllable break" which is pronounced as two distinct syllables,= it is clear that zo pei, if considered phonologically equivalent to zo pe,= i, would then have to constitute both one and two syllables simultaneously,= which doesn't seem to make much sense. This is not even mentioning the pot= ential confusion with zo pe'i, with which the main differentiation between = it and zo pei seems to be moreso the disyllabicity as opposed to the presen= ce or nonpresence of an [h] phoneme/allophone.

mi'e la'oi jesushlinc= oln

On Thursday, November 1, 2012 4:52:31 PM UTC-4, Pierre Abbat wro= te:
On Thursday, November 01, 2= 012 13:00:16 jesush...@gmail.com wrote:
> If [p=C9=9B.i] =3D [p=C9=9Bi], what about cmavo stress rules? Acco= rding to CLL 3.3 a
> comma is a syllable break, but according to LBG 3.9 a diphthong al= ways
> counts as one syllable. On what syllable would [p=C9=9B.i] be stre= ssed, given
> that [p=C9=9Bi] only has one syllable to stress?

There's no official rule yet about which vowel of a diphthong to stress= . I think=20
that, in a stressed diphthong, the first vowel of a falling diphthong a= nd the=20
second vowel of a rising diphthong should be stressed: =C3=A9i, i=C3=B3= , u=C3=AD, i=C3=BA.

There is no rule about stressing cmavo, except that, if stressed, a cma= vo=20
before a brivla may need to be separated from it by a pause. E.g. "l=C3= =B3krat=C3=A1igo"=20
=3D "lokra tai go" (crustacean like iff) but "l=C3=B3.krat=C3=A1igo" = =3D "lo krataigo" (a=20
hawthorn).

Pierre
--=20
gau do li'i co'e kei do

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/gB= Kl7LPtGrMJ.
=20 To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou= ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban= ?hl=3Den.
------=_Part_660_31691082.1351804380559--