Received: from mail-yh0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]:58513)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <lojban+bncBCW7JPVOKYILL2UGQUCRUBBOZFFDY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1TY6ZB-00072z-Dp; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:43 -0800
Received: by mail-yh0-f61.google.com with SMTP id o21sf5808842yho.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id
         :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=DCiDkcIo9pEMT9bqaNTHhVNYZd93br2QoByslsr5+xs=;
        b=rIv8gtslo+NdcWMpg0fcSbJUE3BF/DxOV1Lq6aTK7rpbQjuAXnC+RB2+RrMHNb9BCN
         /6xfLKchajbbbyab/25V9rjMjvy1wO7f+uVUxhjpozSC/gVrxPuqewNDsb88CfuTrW6H
         h559a77XcqQ4KjPZo3WDynX3jjaO5fmcl7J3NZn9l3netygSNyZsnH21tqRvUficPx2l
         RAwE4Wee6nEIPNG9RFyw4Rtzz0TMbgQvpucbODiShYTQBI0q6XSoHHNKqI/Fr0LfMbL5
         OJt83zJLV4CRg4tNDGX7388lSNGWFXOqfznyVmBY1sgqfSrczr86PcBIrpaXPDX7kdHH
         fW6A==
Received: by 10.68.135.67 with SMTP id pq3mr5925154pbb.19.1352774966444;
        Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:26 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: lojban@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.190.100 with SMTP id gp4ls27397840pbc.9.gmail; Mon, 12 Nov
 2012 18:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.191.97 with SMTP id gx1mr1333226pbc.4.1352774965276;
        Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.191.97 with SMTP id gx1mr1333225pbc.4.1352774965266;
        Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m8si1811547pav.2.2012.11.12.18.49.24
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from rlpowell by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1TY6Z1-00072v-W4
	for lojban@googlegroups.com; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:24 -0800
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:49:23 -0800
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] ije + naku ?
Message-ID: <20121113024923.GS25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
References: <CAFSTfVA6J=mL7YWYC2YM+g4S+tfot=N+EQfsh8JeOB9KLP5=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121111193619.GL25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAHiXx=N5-DvvEusqX=vQDG3BpjjURZcQkTRKUmKCYycakJP8sQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO1AUJMi=-ute+g+_HNaa0W6wQO2NsDO1tnWeDD37LmP4LzjBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121113010413.GQ25271@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <CAO7tK2cO5SN-e_vvgKqWR+mBioBhOh86kYyP9c4BbxPs62CKnA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2cO5SN-e_vvgKqWR+mBioBhOh86kYyP9c4BbxPs62CKnA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates
 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Reply-To: lojban@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban@googlegroups.com; contact lojban+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <lojban.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 1004133512417
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en_US>
Sender: lojban@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:lojban+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/lojban/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+1004133512417+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:34:22PM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Robin Lee Powell
> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > Is there any reason *not* to so modify the parser?  I'm really
> > surprised this restriction exints; does anyone know the reason?
>=20
> If you want a prenex to have scope over ijek-connected sentences,
> you can't allow each sentences to have its own prenex (or at least
> the first one can't have its own prenex). I always found the
> choice of giving ijeks tighter scope than prenexes unintuitive,
> but whichever way you choose, you lose something. With forethought
> connectives, the issue doesn't arise.

Ah, Ok, thanks.  No reason to change the current state, then; if
someone could add this issue to the errata page, that would be
swell.

-Robin

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegrou=
ps.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban=
?hl=3Den.